環保專案成果報告查詢系統

專案計畫編號
經費年度	098
計畫經費	16,300 千元
專案開始日期	2009/03/01
專案結束日期	2010/02/28
專案主持人	卓啟弘
主辦單位	臺中市政府環境保護局
承辦人	賴後讚
執行單位	台灣曼寧工程顧問股份有限公司
專案分類	大氣空氣
中文關鍵字	許可制度;空氣污染防制費;連續自動監測設施
英文關鍵字	Permit system;Air pollution fee;CEMS
協同主持人
共同主持人
計畫聯絡人	莊隆凱
計畫聯絡電話	04-25271330#
計畫聯絡信箱	kently@twml.com.tw

中文摘要	本計畫執行期程自98年3月1日至99年2月28日止，共計12個月。其中主要工作項目包括：資料庫維護更新與管理、執行許可制度、辦理空污費催補繳及查核、連續自動監測設施管制、執行排放量網路申報審核及各類宣導說明會等工作項目，各作業項目均已依工作進度規劃期程進行。計畫執行期間，共核發251張許可證，其中包括設置23張、變更2張、操作38張、異動70張、展延67張、換補證39張及生煤許可12張，平均審查日數為9.61日，平均補正日數為20.41日。本年度許可審查作業延續ISO9001及為民服務精神，落實許可前查、督測及核證前的協商，因此在許可審查日數及申請案件的錯誤率方面持續有良好績效。同時現階段已完成276張證(279製程)許可查核，其中97製程與許可核定內容不符，不符合率為34.77%，查核不符合項目比例較高者為污染源製程異動，卻未送件申請許可異動，目前已完成改善者為81件，改善完成率為83.51﹪，尚在改善中者計16個製程，本團隊皆定時提報予環保局備查，並不定時以電話追蹤與督促，敦促業者儘速完成改善。資料庫清查更新部分，計完成256家清查建檔作業，清查後其中有212家工廠屬於有污染排放行為且需持續列管之固定污染源，暫時停工者2家，篩除列管之污染源計41家。清查結果顯示，大部分公私場所受到97年度第3、第4季金融海嘯影響，產能大幅減低，因此製程設備申請停工或拆除，造成廠內設備減少，清查更新之排放量亦呈現下降趨勢，其中以一氧化碳及揮發性有機物排放量分別較清查前下降71%及21%，下降幅度最大。空污費移撥地方執行後，本計畫積極協助完成空污費審查、核收及結算作業，自98年起揮發性有機物空污費審查亦交由地方主管機關審查，本團隊依規定時限完成審查工作，目前97第4季至98第3季申報率為100%，98第4季尚有50餘家尚未完成申報，後續將持續協助進行催繳，務必使申報率達100%。在徵收金額方面，97年第4季起空污費徵收金額有下降趨勢，除了在空污費經濟誘因下，業者藉由製程改善或選用低污染性原物料，降低揮發性有機物排放量外，公私場所明顯受97年下旬全球景氣不佳影響，原物料使用及排放量皆下降。計畫執行期間，本團每月定期完整備份連續自動監測資料庫及公私場所上傳原始資料，以確保監測資料完整；同時每日檢查上傳狀況，檢核結果每月彙整提交環保局備查。本團隊除每日檢核公私場所上傳資料之合理性及正確性外，亦定期統計分析公私場所之上傳率及有效監測時數百分比，目前各廠之連線皆無異常狀況，上傳率及有效率皆能符合法規規範，同時本團隊開發維護之監測設施管理系統入圍98年度環保公僕創意王既有環保措施類競賽決選，系統開發及維護成果獲得環保署肯定。配合環保署於98年1月公告「固定污染源逸散性粒狀污染物空氣污染防制設施管理辦法」，環保局於98年5月26日公告96年12月24日公告之「臺中縣公私場所申請固定污染源操作許可證其防制措施應符合指定之事項」自98年7月1日起停止適用，使業者有統一之遵循依據，同時本團隊推動堆置場地籍套印比對，完成1場次量測，並依據量測結果要求業者移除超量堆置物，顯示採用現場量測可達到管制目的。
中文關鍵字	許可制度;空氣污染防制費;連續自動監測設施

中文摘要

本計畫執行期程自98年3月1日至99年2月28日止，共計12個月。其中主要工作項目包括：資料庫維護更新與管理、執行許可制度、辦理空污費催補繳及查核、連續自動監測設施管制、執行排放量網路申報審核及各類宣導說明會等工作項目，各作業項目均已依工作進度規劃期程進行。計畫執行期間，共核發251張許可證，其中包括設置23張、變更2張、操作38張、異動70張、展延67張、換補證39張及生煤許可12張，平均審查日數為9.61日，平均補正日數為20.41日。本年度許可審查作業延續ISO9001及為民服務精神，落實許可前查、督測及核證前的協商，因此在許可審查日數及申請案件的錯誤率方面持續有良好績效。同時現階段已完成276張證(279製程)許可查核，其中97製程與許可核定內容不符，不符合率為34.77%，查核不符合項目比例較高者為污染源製程異動，卻未送件申請許可異動，目前已完成改善者為81件，改善完成率為83.51﹪，尚在改善中者計16個製程，本團隊皆定時提報予環保局備查，並不定時以電話追蹤與督促，敦促業者儘速完成改善。資料庫清查更新部分，計完成256家清查建檔作業，清查後其中有212家工廠屬於有污染排放行為且需持續列管之固定污染源，暫時停工者2家，篩除列管之污染源計41家。清查結果顯示，大部分公私場所受到97年度第3、第4季金融海嘯影響，產能大幅減低，因此製程設備申請停工或拆除，造成廠內設備減少，清查更新之排放量亦呈現下降趨勢，其中以一氧化碳及揮發性有機物排放量分別較清查前下降71%及21%，下降幅度最大。空污費移撥地方執行後，本計畫積極協助完成空污費審查、核收及結算作業，自98年起揮發性有機物空污費審查亦交由地方主管機關審查，本團隊依規定時限完成審查工作，目前97第4季至98第3季申報率為100%，98第4季尚有50餘家尚未完成申報，後續將持續協助進行催繳，務必使申報率達100%。在徵收金額方面，97年第4季起空污費徵收金額有下降趨勢，除了在空污費經濟誘因下，業者藉由製程改善或選用低污染性原物料，降低揮發性有機物排放量外，公私場所明顯受97年下旬全球景氣不佳影響，原物料使用及排放量皆下降。計畫執行期間，本團每月定期完整備份連續自動監測資料庫及公私場所上傳原始資料，以確保監測資料完整；同時每日檢查上傳狀況，檢核結果每月彙整提交環保局備查。本團隊除每日檢核公私場所上傳資料之合理性及正確性外，亦定期統計分析公私場所之上傳率及有效監測時數百分比，目前各廠之連線皆無異常狀況，上傳率及有效率皆能符合法規規範，同時本團隊開發維護之監測設施管理系統入圍98年度環保公僕創意王既有環保措施類競賽決選，系統開發及維護成果獲得環保署肯定。配合環保署於98年1月公告「固定污染源逸散性粒狀污染物空氣污染防制設施管理辦法」，環保局於98年5月26日公告96年12月24日公告之「臺中縣公私場所申請固定污染源操作許可證其防制措施應符合指定之事項」自98年7月1日起停止適用，使業者有統一之遵循依據，同時本團隊推動堆置場地籍套印比對，完成1場次量測，並依據量測結果要求業者移除超量堆置物，顯示採用現場量測可達到管制目的。

中文關鍵字

許可制度;空氣污染防制費;連續自動監測設施

類型	檔名	檔案大小	說明	最新版公開日期
期末報告	98年臺中縣固定污染源許可、空污費審查及資料庫管理計畫期末正式報告.pdf	10MB		2010/7/1 上午 12:00:00

摘要	The project was executed from March 1, 2009 to February 28, 2010, twelve months in total. Working items were involved maintenance, update and management of database system, handled, examined and certificated permits, and the auditing of the site and implementation, confirmed the coincidence rate of the Act, pursued, examined and audited air pollution control fees, examination of pollution emissions by network, on-the-job training of dedicated air pollution control personnel, handled cases of factories and hold of all kinds of guidance councils, and etc., which were completed on schedule in this project. Control factories of this annual project were higher than last annual. The aim processes of control list are basic metal industry, mechanical device manufacturing and repair industry, and textile industry, printing and dyeing industry. The annual air pollution emissions quantities of the project were a little bit lower than last annual. Other outcomes of the project included: completed 256 firms for maintenance and update, certificated 251 permits, completed 279 processes of permit audit and examined 279 processes of permit, detected factories of levy subjects and pursued factories of air pollution control fees, and audited factories of air pollution control fees, and completed emission audit of air pollution control fees from the first to the third in 2009, etc. All contents and detail results were described on each chapter of this report. Other key work of the annual project was strengthened fugitive emission source control, particularly particle and VOCs. Concerning fugitive particle pollutant control, we cooperated to the “Stationary Pollution Source Fugitive Particle Pollution Control Facilities Management Regulations” announced by Environmental Protection Administration on January 8, 2009 and “Error Demerit and Handling Principle for Violation of Stationary Pollution Source Fugitive Particle Pollution Control Facilities Management Regulations” on July 17, 2009. Our team kept checking and providing factories with the related regulations. We asked factories to remove excess particle piling based on the measurement result. Based on carrying out approval and review of cases this year, the quantity of the cases we accepted was always the most of the whole country, the labors was not enough to support the cases. Besides, we had to not only finish reviewing cases before the deadline, but requesting good quality. It took too much resource to revise the manuscripts in terms of the administration assessment of our team. Therefore, the better quality of the cases we accepted, the higher ability to approve the cases.
英文關鍵字	Permit system;Air pollution fee;CEMS

摘要

The project was executed from March 1, 2009 to February 28, 2010, twelve months in total. Working items were involved maintenance, update and management of database system, handled, examined and certificated permits, and the auditing of the site and implementation, confirmed the coincidence rate of the Act, pursued, examined and audited air pollution control fees, examination of pollution emissions by network, on-the-job training of dedicated air pollution control personnel, handled cases of factories and hold of all kinds of guidance councils, and etc., which were completed on schedule in this project. Control factories of this annual project were higher than last annual. The aim processes of control list are basic metal industry, mechanical device manufacturing and repair industry, and textile industry, printing and dyeing industry. The annual air pollution emissions quantities of the project were a little bit lower than last annual. Other outcomes of the project included: completed 256 firms for maintenance and update, certificated 251 permits, completed 279 processes of permit audit and examined 279 processes of permit, detected factories of levy subjects and pursued factories of air pollution control fees, and audited factories of air pollution control fees, and completed emission audit of air pollution control fees from the first to the third in 2009, etc. All contents and detail results were described on each chapter of this report. Other key work of the annual project was strengthened fugitive emission source control, particularly particle and VOCs. Concerning fugitive particle pollutant control, we cooperated to the “Stationary Pollution Source Fugitive Particle Pollution Control Facilities Management Regulations” announced by Environmental Protection Administration on January 8, 2009 and “Error Demerit and Handling Principle for Violation of Stationary Pollution Source Fugitive Particle Pollution Control Facilities Management Regulations” on July 17, 2009. Our team kept checking and providing factories with the related regulations. We asked factories to remove excess particle piling based on the measurement result. Based on carrying out approval and review of cases this year, the quantity of the cases we accepted was always the most of the whole country, the labors was not enough to support the cases. Besides, we had to not only finish reviewing cases before the deadline, but requesting good quality. It took too much resource to revise the manuscripts in terms of the administration assessment of our team. Therefore, the better quality of the cases we accepted, the higher ability to approve the cases.

英文關鍵字

Permit system;Air pollution fee;CEMS