The project was executed from March 1, 2009 to February 28, 2010, twelve months in total. Working items were involved maintenance, update and management of database system, handled, examined and certificated permits, and the auditing of the site and implementation, confirmed the coincidence rate of the Act, pursued, examined and audited air pollution control fees, examination of pollution emissions by network, on-the-job training of dedicated air pollution control personnel, handled cases of factories and hold of all kinds of guidance councils, and etc., which were completed on schedule in this project.
Control factories of this annual project were higher than last annual. The aim processes of control list are basic metal industry, mechanical device manufacturing and repair industry, and textile industry, printing and dyeing industry. The annual air pollution emissions quantities of the project were a little bit lower than last annual.
Other outcomes of the project included: completed 256 firms for maintenance and update, certificated 251 permits, completed 279 processes of permit audit and examined 279 processes of permit, detected factories of levy subjects and pursued factories of air pollution control fees, and audited factories of air pollution control fees, and completed emission audit of air pollution control fees from the first to the third in 2009, etc. All contents and detail results were described on each chapter of this report.
Other key work of the annual project was strengthened fugitive emission source control, particularly particle and VOCs. Concerning fugitive particle pollutant control, we cooperated to the “Stationary Pollution Source Fugitive Particle Pollution Control Facilities Management Regulations” announced by Environmental Protection Administration on January 8, 2009 and “Error Demerit and Handling Principle for Violation of Stationary Pollution Source Fugitive Particle Pollution Control Facilities Management Regulations” on July 17, 2009. Our team kept checking and providing factories with the related regulations. We asked factories to remove excess particle piling based on the measurement result.
Based on carrying out approval and review of cases this year, the quantity of the cases we accepted was always the most of the whole country, the labors was not enough to support the cases. Besides, we had to not only finish reviewing cases before the deadline, but requesting good quality. It took too much resource to revise the manuscripts in terms of the administration assessment of our team. Therefore, the better quality of the cases we accepted, the higher ability to approve the cases.
