098

5,346 千元

2009/04/01

2010/03/31

施桂英

臺中市政府環境保護局

蘇憶貞

台灣曼寧工程顧問股份有限公司

大氣空氣

環保署考評、環保局考核、空氣污染防制計畫書、空品不良應變;環保署考評、環保局考核、空氣污染防制計畫書、空品不良應變

EPA evaluation, EPB evaluation, air pollution prevention plan, response to poor air quality

施桂英

04-23293771#222

sunny@twml.com.tw

臺中縣98年考評總分87.10分，較97年進步0.6分，獲得「特優」殊榮，98年度推動多項管制工作深獲委員肯定，包括研訂電力業和鋼鐵業加嚴排放標準草案；配合環保署推動PM2.5先期管制研究分析，並建立戴奧辛環境監測資料庫；固定源資料庫檢核之品質改善明顯；積極推動河港揚塵改善，建立協調平台及策略整合，並於東北季風河川揚塵啟動緊急應變；加嚴標準及緊急應變措施制定合宜，民眾陳情案件及跨單位河床裸露地管制成效佳；污染地圖即時監控營建工地，採空污費網路三合一申報系統，營建空污費多元管道繳費。 98年臺中縣總計編列20項計畫，編列總經費達200,800仟元，固定源管制共計編列5項計畫、移動源管制編列3項計畫、逸散源管制編列6項計畫、專案性計畫編列6項計畫。 98年臺中縣提報環保署之地方特色有三項：1.臺中港區移動源污染物減量成效評估；2.港區儲槽、加油站逸散性VOC管制；3.重要道路沿線(國道、高鐵、快速公路)推動遍地開花計畫減少稻田露天燃燒。 98年臺中縣空污計畫考核要點於98年3月10日經「臺中縣第六屆空氣污染防制基金技術諮詢小組」第八次會議審議後經局長簽核公告實施，評分項目計有八大項次「資料提交管考(15%)」、「 合約工作量(10%)」、「環保署報表提報(10%)」、「委員督導查核及期中(末)審查會議考核(20%)」、「人員異動(3%)」、「有具體成效或提升滿意度之作法(22%)」、「有具體成效或提升滿意度之作法(22%)」、「計畫成果宣導效益(5%)」、「計畫團隊執行成效及作業配合度(15%)」。98年考核總成績，以河川計畫得分成績87.36分最高，其次為許可計畫86.83分第2名、機車計畫86.76分第3名。 在會議辦理方面依合約規定完成之會議，包括2場業務執行檢討研商小組會議、4場工作檢討協調會、4場督導考核會議、出席98年空污計畫期中/期末審查會議、3場專家學者諮詢會議、1場98年度空氣污染防制計畫工作項目協商會議、2場中部空品區交流會議、2場聯席會議、4場次空品區工作協商會議、1場問卷說明會議、1場成果檢討會議等34場會議及5場非合約規定辦理會議，總計辦理39場會議。上述辦理之會議，每季進行意見追蹤管考，有8項意見建議99年持續追蹤執行成果。 98年版臺中縣空氣污染防制計畫書，於9月17日經環保署核定，符合98年環保署考評要點規定於9月底完成核備。98年版污防書面臨之最大挑戰為空氣品質PSI>100不良率，100年要改善至1.26%，減量空間來源，現行空污計畫執行已無削減量，僅營建工地及街道洗掃有例行減量來源，未來減量空間有賴特定污染源訂定加嚴管理措施推動，包括「電力業排放標準加嚴管制」、「鋼鐵業排放標準加嚴管制」、「明定一級營建工地應採行之防制措施等級」、「公告非屬行業別管制對象之VOCs年許可排放量達一定規模者之排放標準」、「既存固定污染源指定削減原則推動」、「粉粒狀物堆置場達一定規模須採室內堆置」。98年版污防書並規劃年度空品惡化演習計畫及規劃100年臺中縣市合併之執行計畫。 98年臺中縣空氣污染管制工作施政認知，最為民眾瞭解的是機動車輛怠轉時間管制規定政策（有61.39%表示知道）與加油站油氣管制措施(有58.1%的民眾表示知道)，最不為民眾知道的空污管制措施項目是新購或改裝油氣雙燃料車補助政策，只有27.86%民眾表示知道。準備推動之空氣污染防制政策支持部分，政策支持度最高的空污防制措施為節能減碳措施(有94.81%)及推動鼓勵民間及企業團體認養或志工的積極參與空氣品質淨化區維護管理政策等政策(支持度91.37%)。 93年以來臺中縣不良站日數逐漸減，98年空氣品質不良站日(PSI>100)共27日，扣除沙塵暴影響 (98/4/25)，造成空品不良指標污染物以臭氧為主，計22站日，其次為懸浮微粒4站日，共26站日。97及98年為近6年來空氣品質最佳之兩年。 計畫執行期間共發布39次應變作業，通報指標物以臭氧為主共計32次，懸浮微粒7次，應變作業減量統計，總懸浮微粒削減量達3.901公噸、懸浮微粒1.918公噸、揮發性有機物1.571公噸、甲苯0.005公噸、氮氧化物3.930公噸、一氧化碳0.108公噸。

環保署考評、環保局考核、空氣污染防制計畫書、空品不良應變;環保署考評、環保局考核、空氣污染防制計畫書、空品不良應變

98年臺中縣SIP_正式報告.pdf

16MB

2010/9/1 上午 12:00:00

Taichung County scored a total of 87.10 in the evaluation for 2009, improving from 2008 by 0.6, and was recognized as “excellent”. The County was praised by the committee for a multiple of control works in 2009. These included drafting the reinforced emission standards for power industry and steel industry; conducting research and analysis in PM2.5 preliminary control in line with the EPA policy and building the dioxins-focused enviormental monitoring database; notable improvement on the quality of search in stationary source database; aggresively improving dust rising in rivers and harbors, establishing coordinating platform and strategic integration and activating immergency response to dust rising on rivers due to northeastern monsoon. Also included were the appropriate formulation of tightened standards and emergency responsive measures, good results of people appeals and inter-agency control of exposed riverbeds; real-time monitoring of constructions sites by pollution map, exercise of on-line filing system for air pollution fees and the construction of diversified payments for air pollution fees. Taichung County drew up a total of 20 projects on NT$200.8 million dollars allocated. These are 5 projects for stationary source control, 3 for mobile source control, 6 for fugitive source control and 6 for special projects. Taichung County reported three regional features in 2009 to EPA: 1. The results assessment of mobile source pollutants reduction in Taichung Port area; 2. Fugitive VOC contol on reservoirs and gas stations in the Port area; and 3. Promotion of Blossom Project along major roads (national freeways, HSR and expresswyas) to decrease burning the rice fields in open air. The regulations on evaluation of 2009 Taichung County air pollution program were announced as effective with the Bureau Director approval after the review at the Eighth meeting by the “Sixth air pollution control fund and technical consultant panel of Taichung County” on March 10, 2009. These focus on the 8 items as follows: “control and evaluation of data submission (15%)”, “contract workload (10%)”, “report of EPA forms (10%)”, “committee supervision and evaluation and evaluation by mid-term (term-end) review meeting (20%)”, “changes in personnel (3%)”, “specific results or practices to increase satisfaction available (22%)”, benefits of propaganda for project results“(5%)” and “executive results and cooperation on operation by project team(15%)”. In the 2009 evaluations, the river project scored top, with 87.36, immediately followed by permit project, 86.83 and bicycle project 86.76. Meetings completed pursuant to the contracts included 34 meetings, which were 2 business execution review panel meetings, 4 work review and coordination meetings, 4 supervision and evaluation meetings, mid-term/term-end review meeting (attended) on 2009 air pollution project, 3 expert counseling meetings, 1 task coordination meeting for 2009 air pollution control project, 2 Central region exchange meeting on air quality, 2 joint meetings, 4 regional task coordination meeting on air quality, 1 meeting on questionnaires explanation and 1 results review meeting; plus 5 meetings held outside the contracts. Above meeting held were followed by opinion follow-up control and evaluation every quarter; eight opinions suggested continual follow-up of executive results in 2010. The 2009 version of Taichung County air pollution control plan was approved by EPA on September 17, and its report was completed in end September complying with the 2009 regulations on EPA evaluation. This plan is greatly challenged in the poor air quality rate PSI>100 which should be improved to be 1.26% in 2011. To improve, only construction sites and street cleaning provide rooms for routine reduction, as the current air pollution program already has no rooms to reduce. The future rooms for reduction rely on the realization of tightened managing measures on specific polluting sources, including “tightened for control of emission by standards for power industry”, “tightened for control of emission by standards for steel industry”, “expressly stipulation of exercise of rating of control measures in 1st grade construction sites”, “standards for emissions by those not listed among controlled industries but with certain scale of annual permitted VOC emissions”, “realization of specified resuction principles for existing stationary polluting sources” and “requirement for indoor storage of powders and particles up to a certain scale”. The 2009 version of pollution control plan also plans on annual air quality deterioration drills and 2011 project of Taichung County and City consolidation. Taichung County’s practice of air pollution control in 2009 is best known to people in terms of the policy of idle time control on motor vehicles (61.39% stated to be aware) and vapor control measure on gas stations (58.1% stated to). Of the air pollution control measures, the least known is the policy of subsidies to new or modified hybrid fuel vehicles, to only 27.86% of the people. In the support for policies of air pollution control to be promoted, the most supported measures are the energy conservation measures (by 94.81%) and the management policy of promotion of active participation by adoption of private organizations and business groups or volunteers in air quality cleansing areas (by 91.37%). Since 2004, the observed days of poor quality in Taichung C ounty has been decreasing; in 2009, the poor air quality observed days (PSI>100) totaled 27, which, if the effect of sand storm (98/4/25) was excluded, resulted in 22 observed days of poor air quality with ozone as main indexing pollutant. There were also 4 observed days of airborne particle, which, together with the above-listed, added up to 26. 2008 and 2009 were the two years with best air quality in the last six years. During the execuation of the project, response operations were announced 39 times, with indexing object maining being ozone for 32 times and airborne particle for 7 times. In all, the response operations reduced airborne particle by up to 3.901 tons, airborne particle by 1.918 tons, VOC by 1.571 tons, toluene by 0.005 tons, nitrogen dioxides by 3.930 tons and carbon monoxide by 0.108 tons.

EPA evaluation, EPB evaluation, air pollution prevention plan, response to poor air quality