EPA-99-FA11-03-A156

099

10,000 千元

2010/05/26

2011/08/25

張進順

空保處

簡大詠

環科工程顧問有限公司

化學物質管理

總量管制計畫;削減量差額;排放量認可;指定削減;抵換;細懸浮微粒

Air pollutant emissions ceiling program;Emission Reduction Credits(ERC);Baseline emission approval;Designated reduction;Offset;Fine Particulate Matter(PM2.5)

余志達

張玉婷

02-27753919#321

ting@estc.tw

本計畫係屬環保署施政計畫，包含三大主軸工作：啟動總量管制制度、推動細懸浮微粒管制策略及空氣品質改善策略之行政支援。 一、啟動總量管制制度 1.與美國EPA官員確認我國總量管制係類似美國清空法新設污染源審議制度，非酸雨計畫中之排放交易制度。 2.與業者、縣市環保局、經濟部工業局及相關技術顧問機構積極溝通討論制度，協助完成兩項子法訂定作業。 3.簡化排放量認可申請作業，首次跨平台整合連結空污費資料庫系統及排放量申報資料庫系統，建置排放量認可線上申請系統功能。 4.完成總量管制計畫初稿、制度相關表單及指引，並主動與環保局技術顧問機構進行討論，瞭解實際運作，避免造成落差。 二、推動細懸浮微粒管制策略 1.確認美國採用FRM定期手動採樣以判定是否符合NAAQS，並建議修正國內空污施行細則第七條規範之空品標準符合判定準則。 2.藉由PM2.5上位計畫檢討參酌專家建議，研擬「細懸浮微粒空氣品質標準訂定研議專家諮詢小組(初稿)」建議未來可推動分組討論。 3.能見度實地採樣分析，發現微粒濃度、成分及能見度均受交通源影響；平行比對結果人工採樣質量濃度低於連續監測結果。 三、空氣品質改善策略之行政支援 1.使用時間序列分析方法，完成分析高屏地區空氣品質、減量效果及排放量三者關連性，建議未來可朝強化移動源及逸散源管制。 2.蒐集彙整國際間最新資訊，完成50篇文獻、6本研究報告回顧，並製作中文及英文版文宣資料，召開及協助辦理50場次相關會議。

總量管制計畫;削減量差額;排放量認可;指定削減;抵換;細懸浮微粒

EPA-99-FA11-03-A156.pdf

26MB

2012/1/1 上午 12:00:00

The study plays a major role supporting Taiwan EPA’s policy plan. The three main topics of this study are shown below: 1.Initiate a district-wide air pollutant emissions ceiling program: (1)Air pollutant emissions ceiling program: Confirmed with USEPA officials that this program is similar to the New Source Review(NSR) of Clean Air Act(CAA), not the Acid Rain Program in emission trading system. (2)Completed two subsidiary legislation: We have actively discussed with the industry, city and county EPA, Ministry of Economic Affairs Industrial Development Bureau, and relevant technical consulting organizations. (3)Simplified application process in the recognition of emission: The cross-platform link of the air pollution charge and emission quantities declaration database system is established for the first time and the on-line application system for emission quantities approval is also enabled. (4)Completed the design of the district-wide air pollutant emissions ceiling program, related forms, and guidelines: In order to avoid gaps between the program and actual operation, we have discussed with EPA’s technical adviser organization actively. 2.Promote fine particle PM2.5 control strategy (1)Confirmed that US employsperiodic FRM manual sampling to conform to NAAQS : Recommends an amendment relating to the determination of conformity to the criterion to Article 7 in the domestic Air Pollution Control Act Enforcement Rules. (2)Reviewed the PM2.5 Master Plan by taking into account of experts’ suggestions: We have set up the ”Expert adviser group of air quality standard for fine particle” and suggested to promote discussions in the group in the future. (3)Visibility sampling and analysis: It was found that traffic influences particle concentration, composition, and visibility. The result showed that particle mass concentration obtained by manual sampling is lower than that obtained by continuous monitoring in parallel comparison. 3.Administrative support of air quality improvement strategy (1)Utiltized time series statistic method to complete analyzing the connections between air quality, emission quantities, and reduction effects in KaoPing area. It is recommended to strengthen the mobile source and fugitive source control. (2)Compiled the latest international information: We have reviewed more than 50 papers and 6 related studies. We have also edited the official guide for public in both the Chinese and English versions, and held or assisted in the 50 related meetings.

Air pollutant emissions ceiling program;Emission Reduction Credits(ERC);Baseline emission approval;Designated reduction;Offset;Fine Particulate Matter(PM2.5)