EPA-99-U1K1-02-101

099

3,300 千元

2010/02/12

2010/12/31

林建宏

管考處

顏振華

財團法人環境與發展基金會

科技計畫

環保標章;規格標準;環境效益

Green Mark;Criteria;Environmental Benefit;Eco-labelling

吳志庭

吳志庭

03-5918094#

aden@edf.org.tw

我國環保標章制度係於民國82 年底開始推動，迄今已開放112 項產品項目供廠商申請。本計畫完成之重點工作包括： (1) 研析環保標章科技發展相關產業之經濟效益部份，經過詳細之文獻分析， 確定了兩種經濟效益分析方法(特徵價值法（Hedonic Price Method, 簡稱 HPM ）及假設市場評價法（Contingent Valuation Method, 簡稱CVM）)已為 各國廣泛使用。故本計畫選擇以後者為主，前者為輔並以電冰箱做為標的 物，進行先期研究。結果顯示兩種方法得出之結論雖有差距，但均顯示環 保標章對電冰箱之經濟效益並不高。 (2) 完成5 項新增環保標章規格標準草案，包含面紙、紙餐巾、辦公室隔間板、 皮鞋及空氣清淨機； (3) 完成電腦類4 項、電腦週邊產品類2 項、熱水器類3 項、建材類2 項、塑 橡膠再生品、紙類、冷氣機、回收木材再生品、玩具、墨水筆及紡織品各 1 項之規格標準修訂，並陸續通過審查中。另電動機車、洗衣機、電冰箱， 螢光燈管等10 項規格標準已完成修訂建議。 (4) 於研析國內外相關標章訂定規格標準之方法或技術部份，經本計畫以問卷 調查方式洽詢其他國家環保標章組織，所獲致之答案均為符合ISO14024 國際標準所規範之實施程序以研擬產品規格標準，包括市場調查，利害相 關者諮詢、產品類別篩選、生命週期考量及產品功能特性鑑別等，僅在落 實程度上有所不同。 (5) 完成塑橡膠再生品，資源回收再利用建材、電氣產品等10 項產品之環境 效益評估並完成準則之撰寫。 (6) 完成其他制度面與行政管理面工作，包括現有3 項標準作業程序與檢測方 法之修訂、召開15 場說明會/公聽會、1 場座談會等。

環保標章;規格標準;環境效益

EPA-99-U1K1-02-101.pdf

8MB

99計畫成果報告書

2011/3/1 上午 12:00:00

Since the introduction of Green Mark Program in 1993, 112 product categories are now available for application. The following major tasks have been completed within this fiscal year: (1) after thorough literature survey, it is confirmed that two methods, HPM and CVM, have been widely used by many countries as the tool to analyze the economical benefits of an ecolabelling program. Therefore, this project used the CVM as the major and HPM as the minor method and Household Refrigerators as the sole target to perform a preliminary study. The result showed that although there were some differences between the conclusions drawn from using CVM and HPM methods, both conclusions demonstrated that having a Green Mark logo could bring only insignificant economical benefit to the Household Refrigerators; (2) selected and drafted product criteria for 5 product categories (Facial Tissue, Paper Napkin, Office Partitions, Leather Shoes and Air Purifiers); (3) completed the revision of 4 Computers-related, 2 Computer Peripheral Products-related, 3 Hot Water Heaters-related, 2 Building Products-related, Recycled Plastic/Rubber, Paper, Air Conditioner, Recycled Wood, Wooden Toys, Ink Pens and Textile Product criteria and they were under or passed review by the Green Mark Review Committee separately. The project had also provided revision suggestions on the other ten criteria, including the ones on Electrical Motorcycles, Washing Machines, Refrigerators and Fluorescent Lamps; (4) the survey to many GEN member organizations on how they develop product criteria was performed and analyzed. All organizations follow the principles and procedures outlined in the ISO 14024 standard, including market survey, stakeholder consultation, product category selection, life cycle thinking as well as identification of key functional characteristics. However, each program has resource of implementation and therefore, different extent of conformity to the standard; (5) the evaluation on the environmental benefits of 10 product categories, including Recycled Plastic/Rubber, Recycled Building Products and energy-using products was completed and a “Guideline for the Evaluation of Environmental Benefit of Green Mark Products” was drafted and (5) Other program system-related and administrative work items were performed, including the revision of three existing standard operation procedures and testing methods, organizing 15 public hearing meetings and 1 workshop.

Green Mark;Criteria;Environmental Benefit;Eco-labelling