環保專案成果報告查詢系統

專案計畫編號	EPA-99-HA14-03-A122
經費年度	099
計畫經費	3,740 千元
專案開始日期	2010/04/14
專案結束日期	2010/12/31
專案主持人	陳志恆教授
主辦單位	回收基管會
承辦人	李日琳
執行單位	台北科技大學
專案分類	化學物質管理
中文關鍵字	分級管理指標、輔導評鑑、分級補貼費率
英文關鍵字	Rating Management Indicators, Counseling Evaluation, Rating Management Recycling and Clearance, Disposal Rate Fees
協同主持人	張添晉教授;張四立教授
共同主持人
計畫聯絡人	曾香斐
計畫聯絡電話	02-27712171#4133
計畫聯絡信箱	nova214@hotmail.com

中文摘要	為提升廢電子電器及廢資訊物品受補貼機構之產業競爭力、處理技術及廠務管理能力，本計畫著手進行分級管理作業相關制度之研擬。透過經濟誘因及分級管理模式，誘使業者提升營運能力。首先工作重點為研擬分級指標，本計畫蒐集國內外環境績效指標，探討廢電子電器及廢資訊物品受補貼機構欲要提升方向，研擬分級指標，並召開分級指標諮詢會議，探討其合適性及完整性。分級指標包含5大面向：環境面、管理面、財務面、技術面及社會面，共計43項指標，級距共分為4級(A~D級)。第二項工作重點為輔導評鑑作業，依據前述擬定分級指標進行受補貼機構現場輔導及試評鑑作業。由試評鑑作業結果得知，獲得B級10家，C級為5家，並藉現場作業彙整受補貼機構試評鑑之問題及困難，及委員提供之試評鑑建議事項，追蹤各場缺失改善成效。第三項工作重點為分級補貼費率估算，考量基金收支平衡來考量，規劃B級為現行補貼費率，C級則調降補貼費率，A級則調升補貼費率，D級零補貼。根據估算結果，廢資訊物品方面為，C級為現行補貼費之81.70%，A級為現行補貼費之130.96%；廢電子電器方面為，C級為現行補貼費之92.10%，A級為現行補貼費之113.74%。最後一項工作重點為探討廢電子電器及廢資訊物品受補貼機構相關處理準則及技術提升之方向，以促使業者能改善廠區環境等，希冀藉由完成規劃之廢電子電器及廢資訊物品類分級管理補貼制度，以協助提供環保署在分級管理制度上之參考方向，並促使處理業者有效提升整體廠務管理及處理技術，以增加銷售管道，降低回收處理成本，並加強廢電子電器與廢資訊物品受補貼機構全盤性的污染防治。
中文關鍵字	分級管理指標、輔導評鑑、分級補貼費率

中文摘要

為提升廢電子電器及廢資訊物品受補貼機構之產業競爭力、處理技術及廠務管理能力，本計畫著手進行分級管理作業相關制度之研擬。透過經濟誘因及分級管理模式，誘使業者提升營運能力。首先工作重點為研擬分級指標，本計畫蒐集國內外環境績效指標，探討廢電子電器及廢資訊物品受補貼機構欲要提升方向，研擬分級指標，並召開分級指標諮詢會議，探討其合適性及完整性。分級指標包含5大面向：環境面、管理面、財務面、技術面及社會面，共計43項指標，級距共分為4級(A~D級)。第二項工作重點為輔導評鑑作業，依據前述擬定分級指標進行受補貼機構現場輔導及試評鑑作業。由試評鑑作業結果得知，獲得B級10家，C級為5家，並藉現場作業彙整受補貼機構試評鑑之問題及困難，及委員提供之試評鑑建議事項，追蹤各場缺失改善成效。第三項工作重點為分級補貼費率估算，考量基金收支平衡來考量，規劃B級為現行補貼費率，C級則調降補貼費率，A級則調升補貼費率，D級零補貼。根據估算結果，廢資訊物品方面為，C級為現行補貼費之81.70%，A級為現行補貼費之130.96%；廢電子電器方面為，C級為現行補貼費之92.10%，A級為現行補貼費之113.74%。最後一項工作重點為探討廢電子電器及廢資訊物品受補貼機構相關處理準則及技術提升之方向，以促使業者能改善廠區環境等，希冀藉由完成規劃之廢電子電器及廢資訊物品類分級管理補貼制度，以協助提供環保署在分級管理制度上之參考方向，並促使處理業者有效提升整體廠務管理及處理技術，以增加銷售管道，降低回收處理成本，並加強廢電子電器與廢資訊物品受補貼機構全盤性的污染防治。

中文關鍵字

分級管理指標、輔導評鑑、分級補貼費率

類型	檔名	檔案大小	說明	最新版公開日期
期末報告	WEEE期末報告定稿-公開版含附件(0225).pdf	5MB		2011/5/1 上午 12:00:00

摘要	In order to promote the strength of competition of waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) recycling industry in Taiwan, it is important to improve the process and factory management efficiency of the EPA-subsidized organizations. The main purpose of this study was to draw up a rating system to evaluate the performance of WEEE treatment plants currently under the subsidization of the Taiwan EPA. Through the economic incentive of the rating system, the subsidized institutes will be motivated to improve the operation efficiency, including treatment process and factory management. The first part of this study was to establish feasible rating indicators for the rating system, which are suitable for the recycling industry in Taiwan. The primitive rating indicators were established and evaluated based on the environmental performance indicators collected from domestic and foreign resources. All the indicators will serve to improve the performance of WEEE treatment plants under the guidelines set by EPA Taiwan. The indicators were then presented to a consulting committee, which was consisted of experts and scholars in related fields, for advisory in order to improve the appropriateness of the indicators. The indicators can be categorized into five major dimensions, namely environment protection, management system, the financial preformance, technology achievement and social responsibility. The finalized rating indicators include 43 items, by which the performances of subsidized institutes can be divided into four levels (from A~D level). The second task of this study was work-site counseling and evaluation for. the 15 subsidized WEEE treatment plants. Based on the proposed indicators, 10 subsidized institutes were evaluated to be Class B, and 5 institutes were Class C. All the questions and suggestions provided by the evaluation experts were compiled and analyzed. The compliance of the evaluation results by the institutes were monitored and traced. The third part of this study was to estimate rate of management disposal fees under the new rating system, by considering the balance of subsidies fund. The proposed rate are as the following. For Class B, the subsidized fee will maintain at current rate. For Class C, the subsidized fee will be reduced. For Class A, to the fee will be raised. For Class D, the institutes will receive zero fee. Accordingly, the adjusted rate for Class C and A waste electrical appliances treatment institute is 81.70% and 130.96% of the current rate, respectively. For the waste electronic appliances treatment institute, the adjusted rate for Class C and A is 92.10% and 113.74% of the current, respectively. The final parts of this project was to assess the treatment process guidelines and identify the directions of technology improvement of WEEE treatment plants. Based on the proposed rating system, suggestions were made to provide the EPA with suitable information for future implementation of rate system. In addition, the guidelines will also assist the subsidized institutes to improve the overall performance and financial achievement of the WEEE treatment institutes.
英文關鍵字	Rating Management Indicators, Counseling Evaluation, Rating Management Recycling and Clearance, Disposal Rate Fees

摘要

In order to promote the strength of competition of waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) recycling industry in Taiwan, it is important to improve the process and factory management efficiency of the EPA-subsidized organizations. The main purpose of this study was to draw up a rating system to evaluate the performance of WEEE treatment plants currently under the subsidization of the Taiwan EPA. Through the economic incentive of the rating system, the subsidized institutes will be motivated to improve the operation efficiency, including treatment process and factory management. The first part of this study was to establish feasible rating indicators for the rating system, which are suitable for the recycling industry in Taiwan. The primitive rating indicators were established and evaluated based on the environmental performance indicators collected from domestic and foreign resources. All the indicators will serve to improve the performance of WEEE treatment plants under the guidelines set by EPA Taiwan. The indicators were then presented to a consulting committee, which was consisted of experts and scholars in related fields, for advisory in order to improve the appropriateness of the indicators. The indicators can be categorized into five major dimensions, namely environment protection, management system, the financial preformance, technology achievement and social responsibility. The finalized rating indicators include 43 items, by which the performances of subsidized institutes can be divided into four levels (from A~D level). The second task of this study was work-site counseling and evaluation for. the 15 subsidized WEEE treatment plants. Based on the proposed indicators, 10 subsidized institutes were evaluated to be Class B, and 5 institutes were Class C. All the questions and suggestions provided by the evaluation experts were compiled and analyzed. The compliance of the evaluation results by the institutes were monitored and traced. The third part of this study was to estimate rate of management disposal fees under the new rating system, by considering the balance of subsidies fund. The proposed rate are as the following. For Class B, the subsidized fee will maintain at current rate. For Class C, the subsidized fee will be reduced. For Class A, to the fee will be raised. For Class D, the institutes will receive zero fee. Accordingly, the adjusted rate for Class C and A waste electrical appliances treatment institute is 81.70% and 130.96% of the current rate, respectively. For the waste electronic appliances treatment institute, the adjusted rate for Class C and A is 92.10% and 113.74% of the current, respectively. The final parts of this project was to assess the treatment process guidelines and identify the directions of technology improvement of WEEE treatment plants. Based on the proposed rating system, suggestions were made to provide the EPA with suitable information for future implementation of rate system. In addition, the guidelines will also assist the subsidized institutes to improve the overall performance and financial achievement of the WEEE treatment institutes.

英文關鍵字

Rating Management Indicators, Counseling Evaluation, Rating Management Recycling and Clearance, Disposal Rate Fees