環保專案成果報告查詢系統

專案計畫編號	EPA-99-FA13-03-D072
經費年度	099
計畫經費	5,300 千元
專案開始日期	2010/03/01
專案結束日期	2011/02/28
專案主持人	黃亮芸
主辦單位	空保處
承辦人	徐淑芷
執行單位	春迪企業股份有限公司
專案分類	大氣空氣
中文關鍵字	液化石油氣;油氣雙燃料車;加氣站
英文關鍵字	Liquefied Petroleum Gas(LPG);Hybrid-LPG Vehicle;Gas Refuel Station
協同主持人
共同主持人
計畫聯絡人	黃亮芸
計畫聯絡電話	02-85110701#21
計畫聯絡信箱	light4026@eugene.com.tw

中文摘要	本計畫已完成99年度1~12月份液化石油氣氣價補助款受理、審查、撥款作業，99年度補助總氣量共計120,116,989.835公升，總金額為240,233,977元。查核作業區分為每季現場查核及每月品質查核，另執行無預警實車查核20站次。每月品質查核導入資料庫指標平台，自動指出異常站及加氣紀錄，資料經篩選後之扣除比例達27%，且每月查核可解決加氣站長期以來錄影存檔不足問題。本計畫於98年完成建置行照掃瞄資料庫、車籍資料庫以及加氣紀錄資料庫，並透過電腦審查系統之連結，可將逐筆資料交叉比對，並提供即時統計分析功能及退補件等相關訊息於網站中。自100年度起開始實施之浮動補助新制，係固定油氣價差為12.7元，補助金額隨油氣價差浮動調整，本計畫採用傳真、簡訊、網路公告等3種方式，即時通知業者最新補助金額。計畫中蒐集彙整歐、美共16國推動油氣雙燃料車之政策及現況，依據國外推動經驗，經濟誘因仍是民眾選擇油氣雙燃料車之主要動力，且改裝費用之回收期程為2~3年間較具吸引力。問卷調查對象分為已改裝車主及汽油車主，問卷數量分別為1,269及910份。改裝車主調查結果顯示，改用雙燃料車輛原因依序為：節省油資（91.7%）、環保因素（27.3%），顯示節省油資是車主改裝之主要因素。受訪汽油車主表示不願意將車輛改裝為油氣雙燃料車者有60.3%，其不願意改裝之因素依序為：加氣站不方便（47.4%）、改裝品質疑慮（34.6%）、車輛安全因素（28.0%）。
中文關鍵字	液化石油氣;油氣雙燃料車;加氣站

中文摘要

本計畫已完成99年度1~12月份液化石油氣氣價補助款受理、審查、撥款作業，99年度補助總氣量共計120,116,989.835公升，總金額為240,233,977元。查核作業區分為每季現場查核及每月品質查核，另執行無預警實車查核20站次。每月品質查核導入資料庫指標平台，自動指出異常站及加氣紀錄，資料經篩選後之扣除比例達27%，且每月查核可解決加氣站長期以來錄影存檔不足問題。本計畫於98年完成建置行照掃瞄資料庫、車籍資料庫以及加氣紀錄資料庫，並透過電腦審查系統之連結，可將逐筆資料交叉比對，並提供即時統計分析功能及退補件等相關訊息於網站中。自100年度起開始實施之浮動補助新制，係固定油氣價差為12.7元，補助金額隨油氣價差浮動調整，本計畫採用傳真、簡訊、網路公告等3種方式，即時通知業者最新補助金額。計畫中蒐集彙整歐、美共16國推動油氣雙燃料車之政策及現況，依據國外推動經驗，經濟誘因仍是民眾選擇油氣雙燃料車之主要動力，且改裝費用之回收期程為2~3年間較具吸引力。問卷調查對象分為已改裝車主及汽油車主，問卷數量分別為1,269及910份。改裝車主調查結果顯示，改用雙燃料車輛原因依序為：節省油資（91.7%）、環保因素（27.3%），顯示節省油資是車主改裝之主要因素。受訪汽油車主表示不願意將車輛改裝為油氣雙燃料車者有60.3%，其不願意改裝之因素依序為：加氣站不方便（47.4%）、改裝品質疑慮（34.6%）、車輛安全因素（28.0%）。

中文關鍵字

液化石油氣;油氣雙燃料車;加氣站

類型	檔名	檔案大小	說明	最新版公開日期
期末報告	EPA-99-FA13-03-D072(公開版).pdf	0MB		2011/6/1 上午 12:00:00

摘要	The LPG price subsidy processing, reviewing, and appropriation from January to December of 2010 had been completed for this project with a total application of subsidy from each station for 120,116,989.835 liters and a total value of 240,233,977 NTD. The each review operation zone was separated into on-site auditing for each season and quality review was completed each month while executing non-informed vehicle auditing for a total of 20 station-times. The monthly quality review was directed into the index platform of the database, which automatically pointed out the irregularities and records for additional gas. The information eliminated after screening reached a percentage of 27% and the auditing of each month resolved the long-term problem of having insufficient video footage archive at the gas refuel stations. The LPG price subsidy review system was established with the vehicle license databank and the vehicle registration scan databank in 2009, and through linking to a computerized review system, it could cross-reference each entry and offer relevant information regarding immediate statistical analysis, rejection, and make-up of documentation on the website. The new floating subsidy policy would be instigated at the beginning of 2011, which had a difference of 12.7NTD compared to the fixed gas rate and the subsidy was adjusted according to the difference of the floating gas price. The most current amount of subsidy was delivered in real time to the industry in 3 ways - fax, text, and website announcements. Information was collected regarding the hybrid technologies and promotional systems from a total of 16 countries in Europe and North America. From the experiences of foreign promotional policies, we could see that the economy factor was still the main drive for the public to choose bi-fueled vehicles (i.e. vehicles fueled by both gasoline and LPG) and the period of return for modification cost was most attractive between 2 to 3 years. The questionnaires were issued to the owners of modified vehicles and regular gas vehicles from whom 1,269 and 910, respectively, were returned. Results from the modified vehicles questionnaires showed the reasons to switch to a hybrid vehicle were to reduce expenditures on fuel (91.7%), environmental factors (27.3%). 60.3% of owners interviewed expressed unwillingness to modify their vehicle into a bi-fueled vehicle for the reasons of inconvenience of refueling (47.4%), quality concern after modification (34.6%), and safety concerns for the vehicles (28.0%).
英文關鍵字	Liquefied Petroleum Gas(LPG);Hybrid-LPG Vehicle;Gas Refuel Station

摘要

The LPG price subsidy processing, reviewing, and appropriation from January to December of 2010 had been completed for this project with a total application of subsidy from each station for 120,116,989.835 liters and a total value of 240,233,977 NTD. The each review operation zone was separated into on-site auditing for each season and quality review was completed each month while executing non-informed vehicle auditing for a total of 20 station-times. The monthly quality review was directed into the index platform of the database, which automatically pointed out the irregularities and records for additional gas. The information eliminated after screening reached a percentage of 27% and the auditing of each month resolved the long-term problem of having insufficient video footage archive at the gas refuel stations. The LPG price subsidy review system was established with the vehicle license databank and the vehicle registration scan databank in 2009, and through linking to a computerized review system, it could cross-reference each entry and offer relevant information regarding immediate statistical analysis, rejection, and make-up of documentation on the website. The new floating subsidy policy would be instigated at the beginning of 2011, which had a difference of 12.7NTD compared to the fixed gas rate and the subsidy was adjusted according to the difference of the floating gas price. The most current amount of subsidy was delivered in real time to the industry in 3 ways - fax, text, and website announcements. Information was collected regarding the hybrid technologies and promotional systems from a total of 16 countries in Europe and North America. From the experiences of foreign promotional policies, we could see that the economy factor was still the main drive for the public to choose bi-fueled vehicles (i.e. vehicles fueled by both gasoline and LPG) and the period of return for modification cost was most attractive between 2 to 3 years. The questionnaires were issued to the owners of modified vehicles and regular gas vehicles from whom 1,269 and 910, respectively, were returned. Results from the modified vehicles questionnaires showed the reasons to switch to a hybrid vehicle were to reduce expenditures on fuel (91.7%), environmental factors (27.3%). 60.3% of owners interviewed expressed unwillingness to modify their vehicle into a bi-fueled vehicle for the reasons of inconvenience of refueling (47.4%), quality concern after modification (34.6%), and safety concerns for the vehicles (28.0%).

英文關鍵字

Liquefied Petroleum Gas(LPG);Hybrid-LPG Vehicle;Gas Refuel Station