環保專案成果報告查詢系統

專案計畫編號
經費年度	099
計畫經費	7,050,000 千元
專案開始日期	2010/06/03
專案結束日期	2011/12/02
專案主持人	宋德高
主辦單位	桃園市政府環境保護局
承辦人	鍾明謙
執行單位	中環科技事業股份有限公司
專案分類	土壤及地下水
中文關鍵字	土壤;地下水;加油站
英文關鍵字	Soil;Groundwater;Gas Station
協同主持人	蕭家寧
共同主持人
計畫聯絡人	吳芳鈴
計畫聯絡電話	07-8152248#52
計畫聯絡信箱	lynnwuctc@gmail.com

中文摘要	本計畫內容為進行桃園縣土壤及地下水污染調查與查證工作，並進行縣內加油站之污染調查，同時協助執行民眾陳情案件之土壤或地下水採樣檢測，以及縣內相關污染改善成果之檢測查核計畫。在土壤調查方面，本計畫共完成6件農地土壤調查，農地重金屬檢測結果主要為銅及鋅兩項超過食用作物農地之管制標準值，環保局已針對超過標準之地號進行公告列管；而11處列管場址之土壤污染驗證結果皆符合管制標準，環保局也陸續公告解除列管；在99年加油站查核結果為高污染潛勢的5座加油站，土壤調查結果有3座的總石油碳氫化合物超過管制標準。在地下水調查方面，本計畫共完成5件地下水陳情案件，檢測結果符合管制標準；並針對5處列管場址各新設1口監測井；而2處列管加油站場址之簡易井地下水調查結果則分別為苯及柴油總碳氫化合物超過第二類地下水污染管制標準。在加油站查核工作中，本計畫已於99至100年完成287站測漏管與陰極防蝕檢測，結果計有44站測漏管功能不符、58站測漏管油氣異常及117站陰極防蝕異常。此外，本工作小組亦針對縣內列管污染場址每二月巡查一次，也完成16口監測井損壞處之修補、16座加油站提送資料及24處列管場址計畫書審查，並於99年10月舉辦2場加油站宣導講習會。本計畫已協助環保局監督縣內土壤及地下水列管場址之改善，查驗整治中加油站場址之地下水，審查加油站及列管場址提送報告，並配合執行污染陳情案件之調查。未來執行土壤及地下水污染防治作業，除應對仍有污染之虞場址進行持續監測外，並查證可能的污染來源；另對高污染潛勢區進行土壤及地下水污染調查及監測，以防止污染源流佈至環境中，並持續利用土基會資料庫，建立縣內土壤及地下水環境背景資料，以利後續相關污染源調查及防治策略之擬定。
中文關鍵字	土壤;地下水;加油站

中文摘要

本計畫內容為進行桃園縣土壤及地下水污染調查與查證工作，並進行縣內加油站之污染調查，同時協助執行民眾陳情案件之土壤或地下水採樣檢測，以及縣內相關污染改善成果之檢測查核計畫。在土壤調查方面，本計畫共完成6件農地土壤調查，農地重金屬檢測結果主要為銅及鋅兩項超過食用作物農地之管制標準值，環保局已針對超過標準之地號進行公告列管；而11處列管場址之土壤污染驗證結果皆符合管制標準，環保局也陸續公告解除列管；在99年加油站查核結果為高污染潛勢的5座加油站，土壤調查結果有3座的總石油碳氫化合物超過管制標準。在地下水調查方面，本計畫共完成5件地下水陳情案件，檢測結果符合管制標準；並針對5處列管場址各新設1口監測井；而2處列管加油站場址之簡易井地下水調查結果則分別為苯及柴油總碳氫化合物超過第二類地下水污染管制標準。在加油站查核工作中，本計畫已於99至100年完成287站測漏管與陰極防蝕檢測，結果計有44站測漏管功能不符、58站測漏管油氣異常及117站陰極防蝕異常。此外，本工作小組亦針對縣內列管污染場址每二月巡查一次，也完成16口監測井損壞處之修補、16座加油站提送資料及24處列管場址計畫書審查，並於99年10月舉辦2場加油站宣導講習會。本計畫已協助環保局監督縣內土壤及地下水列管場址之改善，查驗整治中加油站場址之地下水，審查加油站及列管場址提送報告，並配合執行污染陳情案件之調查。未來執行土壤及地下水污染防治作業，除應對仍有污染之虞場址進行持續監測外，並查證可能的污染來源；另對高污染潛勢區進行土壤及地下水污染調查及監測，以防止污染源流佈至環境中，並持續利用土基會資料庫，建立縣內土壤及地下水環境背景資料，以利後續相關污染源調查及防治策略之擬定。

中文關鍵字

土壤;地下水;加油站

類型	檔名	檔案大小	說明	最新版公開日期
期末報告	99年度桃園縣土壤及地下水污染調查及查證工作計畫.pdf	9MB		2016/9/1 上午 12:00:00

摘要	The tasks of this project consisted of implementing soil and groundwater pollution investigation and verification for Tao Yuan County, inspecting the contamination of the gas stations within the county, assisting with the soil or groundwater sampling and testing for civil complaint cases, as well as validating the pollution cleanup results for the regulated sites. Six agricultural site investigations were conducted for soil survey. The soil test results for heavy metals on the agricultural site indicated that copper and zinc had exceeded the regulation limits for farmland soil. The County Environmental Protection Bureau (EPB) has promulgated the lots as regulated pollution sites. The analytical results of eleven regulated soil pollution sites were verified to be in compliance with the regulatory limits and the EPB will remove these sites from the regulated list accordingly. The investigation in 2010 for the five potentially highly polluted gas stations indicated that the total petroleum hydrocarbons in soil were found to exceed the regulatory limits in three gas stations. The groundwater investigations were conducted for five civil complaint case. The analytical results were found to meet the regulatory limits. A monitoring well was installed in the five regulated pollution sites respectively. However, groundwater samples collected from the simply constructed wells of the two regulated gas stations indicated that benzene and diesel range total petroleum hydrocarbons exceeded the regulatory limits respectively. Soil vapor well monitoring and cathodic protection tests were performed for 287 gas stations for the project in 2010 to 2011. The results indicated that 44 soil vapor wells in the gas stations were found to be working improperly; 58 soil vapor well examinations and 117 cathodic protection tests had abnormal results. In addition, the work crew for this project went around and inspected the County-regulated pollution site every other month, repaired sixteen damaged monitoring wells, and reviewed sixteen work plans submitted for the gas stations and twenty-four reports for regulated pollution sites. Two advocacy workshops for gas station workers were also held in October 2010. The project has assisted the Environmental Protection Bureau (EPB) with supervising the soil and groundwater cleanup for the regulated sites, validation of the ongoing gas station groundwater clean-up, reviewing the reports submitted for the gas stations and regulated pollution sites, and investigating civil complaints. For the future project, we suggest that, regular monitoring of the pollution sites is necessary to comprehend the progress of remediation. Also apply more aggressive technique, like soil gas test, to find out potential contaminated sites and prevent the pollution spread. The GIS database build by EPA is a useful tool to layout the future strategy to manage the soil and groundwater protection and it should be utilized more often in future project.
英文關鍵字	Soil;Groundwater;Gas Station

摘要

The tasks of this project consisted of implementing soil and groundwater pollution investigation and verification for Tao Yuan County, inspecting the contamination of the gas stations within the county, assisting with the soil or groundwater sampling and testing for civil complaint cases, as well as validating the pollution cleanup results for the regulated sites. Six agricultural site investigations were conducted for soil survey. The soil test results for heavy metals on the agricultural site indicated that copper and zinc had exceeded the regulation limits for farmland soil. The County Environmental Protection Bureau (EPB) has promulgated the lots as regulated pollution sites. The analytical results of eleven regulated soil pollution sites were verified to be in compliance with the regulatory limits and the EPB will remove these sites from the regulated list accordingly. The investigation in 2010 for the five potentially highly polluted gas stations indicated that the total petroleum hydrocarbons in soil were found to exceed the regulatory limits in three gas stations. The groundwater investigations were conducted for five civil complaint case. The analytical results were found to meet the regulatory limits. A monitoring well was installed in the five regulated pollution sites respectively. However, groundwater samples collected from the simply constructed wells of the two regulated gas stations indicated that benzene and diesel range total petroleum hydrocarbons exceeded the regulatory limits respectively. Soil vapor well monitoring and cathodic protection tests were performed for 287 gas stations for the project in 2010 to 2011. The results indicated that 44 soil vapor wells in the gas stations were found to be working improperly; 58 soil vapor well examinations and 117 cathodic protection tests had abnormal results. In addition, the work crew for this project went around and inspected the County-regulated pollution site every other month, repaired sixteen damaged monitoring wells, and reviewed sixteen work plans submitted for the gas stations and twenty-four reports for regulated pollution sites. Two advocacy workshops for gas station workers were also held in October 2010. The project has assisted the Environmental Protection Bureau (EPB) with supervising the soil and groundwater cleanup for the regulated sites, validation of the ongoing gas station groundwater clean-up, reviewing the reports submitted for the gas stations and regulated pollution sites, and investigating civil complaints. For the future project, we suggest that, regular monitoring of the pollution sites is necessary to comprehend the progress of remediation. Also apply more aggressive technique, like soil gas test, to find out potential contaminated sites and prevent the pollution spread. The GIS database build by EPA is a useful tool to layout the future strategy to manage the soil and groundwater protection and it should be utilized more often in future project.

英文關鍵字

Soil;Groundwater;Gas Station