EPA-101-J104-02-201

101

31,150 千元

2012/01/01

2012/12/31

何大成

環管處

李慧玲

財團法人工業技術研究院

化學物質管理

緊急應變;毒性化學物質;毒災聯防

Emergency Response;Toxic Chemical;Mutual Aid

周文怡

03-5917777#

wenyi@itri.org.tw

本計畫因應99至102年之「強化毒化物安全管理及災害應變第二期」規劃與延續既有毒災應變體系功能之需求，維持諮詢與監控24小時不打烊、中央毒災應變中心平時與變時開設作業、參與協助斯德哥爾摩公約相關會議、製作毒災簡訊、規劃國內環境毒災之整訓與複訓課程與更新防救災應變資料等工作，其101及102年度則以訂定國內毒化災應變人員認證制度、聯防組織評核基準制訂、疏散避難規劃與廠場輔導機制等方面為主，並辦理國際交流訓練、聯防組織文件審核與實場應變能量測試、毒化物運作廠場輔導、高風險工業區運作災害評析與制訂疏散避難規劃等精進工作項，以強化國內環境災害事故處置作為之目標。 全年無休24小時進行化學品等災害專業諮詢服務與災害通報作業方面：變時作業共協助65場次環境災害事故應變諮詢監控作業，並提供現場救災單位296點建議，30分鐘內發送第1則簡訊其達成率為100 %（合約要求為90%）；平時作業則完成媒體監控案件1,153件（包括國內監控323件與國外監控830件）以及一般諮詢案件378件，總計完成1,531件（合約要求至少900件以上），同步通報環保署業務單位共414件次（其中以公關組73件最多）；因應「六輕重大環境災害應變演練」召開5場次專家與參演單位研商會議，提供「氯」、「1,3-丁二烯」以及「丙烯腈」等毒化物應變作業研析資料；本年度環境毒災簡訊電子報已發行4期（第42-45期），發份數共計19,143份，總瀏覽人數累積為337,084人次。為確保系統正常操作及資安妥善維護，除每日點檢測試外，另完成毒災系統「線上報名之報名驗證碼」等5項功能修正、新增與強化。 推動毒化物國際交流防救業務方面，於10月12日至10月21日參與聯合國斯德哥爾摩公約持久性有機污染物審查委員會第8次會議，並提交成果報告與協助辦理「我國持久性有機污染物斯德哥爾摩公約國家實施計畫 (NIP) 101年第三次推動小組會議」；於05月16日至05月25日派員參與「美國緊急應變整備及有害物質外洩研討會」，並已提交其成果報告；於07月09日至07月13日期間辦理4日之國際毒化災防救交流訓練，以「槽體扶正及轉槽」與「管線止漏技術」等主題進行訓練，總計參與為220人次；辦理首次「國外毒災事故應變現場指揮官訓練研習班」，參訓人數為30名以及收集美國5級制毒化災應變人員訓練認證課程。 強化國內毒災防救預防與整備能量方面，協助審查通過9件聯防組織備查，11件聯防組織複審作業，2件聯防組織資料異動以及30家業者進行聯防媒和之需求輔導，總計全國聯防工作圈已籌組86組，計672廠家數加入，完成1場次聯防工作圈說明會，參與人數87位；完成無預警測試暨實場運作演練聯防工作圈名單篩選，並執行20場次聯防應變訓練工作，計有41組聯防組織參與，10場次聯防應變測試，計有10組聯防組織參與，並依照聯防組織備查文件書審、全國毒災聯防系統資訊填寫審查及無預警測試與實場演練測試三階段評核訂定評核基準與記點原則；於4至5月間完成3梯次常訓課程訓練工作，參訓人數為224位；辦理7隊駐地高階設備訓練與情境模擬推演，計有158人次參與，環境災害事故分析檢測數值查核與協助方面，計完成25場次1,612筆監測數值；辦理1場全國毒化物事故案例研討會，參與人數為340人；辦理1場毒災業務檢討會，參與人數為134人次。 高風險毒化物與工業區運作災害評析與疏散避難原則暨運作安全管理方面，延續99年03月25日召開高風險毒性化學物質篩選原則會議制訂之方法，確認本年度10種次高風險毒化物名單並結合GIS系統，提供毒化物之相關區域管制建議；執行國內8個高風險工業區之危害模擬及疏散避難研析作業，並依完成技術辦理1場次技術資料說明會；辦理7隊次高風險毒性化學物質運作工業區訓練課程，計有158人次參與；毒化物運作安全管理則完成輔導訪視廠場名單篩選與確認，並完成30場次現場訪視工作。

緊急應變;毒性化學物質;毒災聯防

101年期末報告彙整V3.2(外部版).doc

48MB

2013/3/1 上午 12:00:00

This plan was drafted in response to the 2010-2013 "Promotion of Toxic Chemical Safety Management and Incident Response—Stage II," and meets the functional needs of the existing toxic chemical accident response system. The plan provides for constant 24-hour consulting and monitoring services, and the central toxic incident response center conducts operations both routinely and during emergencies, helps hold conferences connected with the Stockholm Convention, produces toxic chemical accident text messages, organizes domestic environmental training and refresher classes, and updates accident prevention and relief data. The plan's chief tasks during 2012 and 2013 include the establishment of a domestic toxic chemical accident response personnel certification system, drafting of joint prevention organization assessment standards, compilation of evacuate and escape plans, and implementation of plant assistance mechanisms. Other important tasks intended to strengthen Taiwan's environmental incident handling capabilities include holding of international interchange training, reviewing of joint prevention organization documents and on-site testing of response capabilities, provision of assistance to toxic chemical substance handling sites, implementation of accident assessment, and drafting of evacuation and escape plans for high-risk industrial areas. With regard to 24-hour year-round professional accident consulting service related to chemical products and accident notification tasks: At the time of accidents, the center performed environmental incident response, consulting, and monitoring services on 65 occasions, provided 296 recommendations to on-site disaster relief units, and achieved a text message delivery rate of 100% within 30 minutes of issuing each message (the contractual requirement is 90%). During ordinary periods, the center completed 1,153 media monitoring cases (including 323 domestic monitoring cases and 830 foreign monitoring cases) and 378 general consulting cases, for a total of 1,531 cases (the contractual requirement is at least 900). The center further notified EPA service units a total of 414 times (the EPA Public Relations received the most notifications—73); held five discussion and review meetings involving experts and participating units in response to the "Sixth Naphtha Cracker Major Environmental Accident Response Exercise" and provided response operation analysis data for chlorine, 1,3-butadiene, and acrylonitrile; and issued four volumes (a total of 19,143 copies) of this year's environmental toxic incident text message e-bulletin (volumes 42-45), which were browsed 337,084 times. To ensure that the system is functioning normally and information security is effective, apart from daily point inspections and testing, the toxic incident system's "sign-up verification code for online sign-up," functions were revised, added, or strengthened. With regard to the promotion of international toxic chemical substance prevention and response interchange services, this organization participated in the 8th conference of the UN Stockholm Convention persistent organic pollutant review committee from 10/12 to 10/21, submitted a results report, and helped hold the "3rd Task Force Conference for the Taiwan Persistent Organic Pollutant Stockholm Convention National Implementation Plan (NIP) 2012"; personnel were sent to participate in the "United States Symposium on Emergency Response Readiness and Hazardous Substance Leakage" from 5/16 to 5/25 and submitted a results report; a four-day international toxic chemical accident prevention and response training session was held from 7/9 to 7/13 and provided training on the topics "tank righting and tank transfer" and "pipeline leak stoppage technologies, attracting 220 participants; the first "Foreign Toxic Incident Response On-site Commanding Officer Training Workshop" was held, attracting 30 participants and providing an American five-grade toxic chemical accident responder training certification class. With regard to strengthening domestic toxic incident prevention, response, and readiness capabilities, this organization assisted with the review and approval of 9 joint prevention organizations and follow-up review of 11 joint prevention organizations, assisted with data updating for 2 joint prevention organizations, and helped match 30 firms with joint prevention organizations; a total of 86 joint prevention working groups have been organized to date, and 672 firms have joined these groups thus far; one joint prevention working group presentation meeting was conducted drawing 87 participants; selection of a no early warning testing and on-site operating exercise joint prevention working group list was completed, and 20 joint prevention response training sessions were held for 41 joint prevention organizations; 10 joint prevention organizations participated in 10 joint prevention response tests; documentary review was performed for joint prevention organizations, national toxic incident joint prevention system information was reviewed, and assessment standards and scoring principles were drafted for the no early warning testing and on-site exercise testing three-stage assessment process. Three routine training sessions were held during April and May and were attended by 224 people. Seven resident high-level equipment training and scenario planning sessions were held and were attended by 158 people. With regard to environmental incident analysis and testing value audits and assistance, a total of 1,612 monitoring values were analyzed in 25 sessions. One national toxic chemical substance accident case conference was held attracting 340 participants. One toxic incident operation review conference was held and was attended by 134 people. With regard to high-risk toxic chemical substance and industrial area operating accident assessment, evacuation and escape principles, and operating safety management, building on the methods formulated at the high-risk toxic chemical substance selection principle conference held on March 25, 2010, this organization confirmed a list of ten high-risk toxic chemical substances for this year, and employing GIS to provide relevant zone control recommendations for toxic chemical substances. Hazard simulations and evacuation and escape analysis was performed for 8 high-risk industrial areas in Taiwan, and one technical data explanatory meeting was held concerning the completed technology. Seven high-risk toxic chemical substance handling industrial area training classes were held for teams, and were attended by 158 people. Selection and confirmation of plants to receive assistance and visits in conjunction with toxic chemical substance handling safety management was completed, and 30 on-site visits were performed.

Emergency Response;Toxic Chemical;Mutual Aid