EPA-101-HA14-03-A124

101

4,480 千元

2012/02/22

2012/12/31

朱宏毅

回收基管會

鄭安利

財團法人台灣產業服務基金會

廢棄物管理

回收標誌;課費制度;碳足跡

Recycling symbol;Charge scheme;Carbon footprint

黃宗煌;李嘉宜

周函螢

02-27844188#239

kelly2788@ftis.org.tw

為檢討應回收容器之回收標誌標示之規定、探討現行廢容器課費機制、建立應回收容器責任物未登記責任業者之查訪途徑及評估廢容器回收再利用之碳排放成效，本計畫完成下列工作事項： 收集各界對於回收標誌標示規定之意見，並對易產生疑義部分，研析容器責任物或回收標誌標示方式之法規修訂。另蒐集分析各縣市廢容器回收情形與回收廢容器之作法，提出加強回收相關建議意見。 透過各項評估因子探討現行廢容器課費機制於不同課費層級下之優劣，並從生質塑膠相關產業之影響、法規適用、稽徵效益、後續扣抵等面向，探討生質塑膠課費作法轉換之可行性。 建立未登記責任業者之查訪作業流程圖，另透過公會會員名單比對、網路商品搜尋及販賣場所現場查訪等3種途徑，篩選疑似未登記責任業者名單，並分析具效益之途徑，供環保署參考。 完成應回收容器回收再製再生料之碳排放數據檢驗及5種廢容器材質碳足跡之實廠盤查作業；並計算紙、鋁箔包、鐵(係指鋼片)、PET及PE等5種廢容器材質之再生料碳足跡；比較原生材料製成容器原料及廢容器回收再製成再生料（二次料）之碳排放差異，並計算廢容器回收再製之減碳效益。

回收標誌;課費制度;碳足跡

正式報告.pdf

3MB

2013/4/1 上午 12:00:00

In order to review the regulations of recycling symbol and the charge scheme of waste containers, build investigation process of un-register recycling business, and evaluate the benefit of carbon reduction for recycling waste containers, the below items have been finished in this project: To collect the opinions on recycling symbol from all sectors, and studied the law on recycling symbol based on the cases which are not easy to get right labeling. Besides, collected and analyzed the recycling situation and how they practiced in different cities, and proposed relevant suggestions to reinforce recycling. Evaluated the advantages and disadvantages of the charge scheme of waste containers under different factors, and discussed the feasibility of changing the charge scheme of bio-plastic container by different levels includes：the influences of related bio-plastic industries, regulation application, charging efficiency and deduction method. Built a investigation flow chart of un-register recycling business, and searched the potential list of un-register recycling business by association member list screening, internet online searching and vending spots on-site searching. The efficient investigation method was also provided to EPA. Completed the data which had been reviewed for designated waste containers and examined 5 waste container materials’carbon footprints, then calculated paper, aseptic packs (including paper, aluminum foil and plastic composite materials), iron (refers to steel sheets), PET and PE have been calculated, and compared raw material with recycled material those could be made of containers and figured out the differences on carbon emission respectively, then evaluated the benefits of carbon reduction by using recycled waste containers to make new ones.

Recycling symbol;Charge scheme;Carbon footprint