環保專案成果報告查詢系統

專案計畫編號	YLEPB-102-031
經費年度	102
計畫經費	9,344 千元
專案開始日期	2013/04/18
專案結束日期	2014/04/17
專案主持人	卓啟弘
主辦單位	雲林縣環境保護局
承辦人	郭子衛
執行單位	台灣曼寧工程顧問股份有限公司
專案分類	大氣空氣
中文關鍵字	連續自動監測設施，相對準確度測試查核，標準氣體查核
英文關鍵字	Continuous Emission Monitoring System, Relative Accuracy Test Audit, Cylinder Gas Audit
協同主持人	林清標
共同主持人
計畫聯絡人	江振源
計畫聯絡電話	04-23293771#
計畫聯絡信箱	zereus@gmail.com

中文摘要	本計畫執行工作項目中，監測設施新增及汰換審查作業，協助環保局針對管道設置監測設施及連線設施之申請審查共計6廠22根煙道，汰換項目包含：不透光率、二氧化硫、氮氧化物、一氧化碳、氧氣及排放流率等污染物分析監測儀與數據擷取程式之計算電腦汰換，且完成台化海豐廠(芳香烴三廠)M07製程PG02管道之新設監測設施審查。數據檢核方面，統計102年上傳監測數據，氣狀污染物共16根有超限紀錄，但102年日超限總筆數均不超過2筆。不透光率部份，則有22根煙道有超限紀錄，以麥寮汽電P101超限筆數最多，但每日累計能仍未超過40筆，均未超過法規規範之累積時數限值。系統與功能查核方面，本計畫共計完成進行34根次的現場法規符合度查核，完成率100%，依照各廠提送之設施確認報告書及監測數據品質保證計畫書進行現場系統查核，查核結果無明顯涉及罰則之違規，針對建議改善項目亦現場輔導改善，且不定時至各廠進行後續追蹤作業；另功能查核之Zero/Span查核完成34根次，完成率達100%以上；RATA監督檢測完成34根次，完成率達100%以上；CGA查核完成34根次，完成率達100%以上；不透光率校正誤差查核完成31根次，完成率達100%以上；NO2/NO轉化器效率完成20根次，完成率達100%。稽查檢測方面，RATA稽查檢測完成20根次，完成率100%，監測結果所有測項RA值均符合標準，但其中塑化麥寮三廠(公用廠) PA01、PC01管道、塑化麥寮二廠(公用廠) P401、塑化麥寮一廠(輕油廠) PT01、PS01管道、台化海豐廠(芳香烴三廠) PG01管道等其部分測項均發生檢測結果之差值平均值≧信賴係數(CC)，故須做BAF修正，已提報環保局辦理要求該廠依管理辦法附錄九進行系統偏移之校正計算並重新補正上傳期間之監測數據，以更新線上資料庫數據。廢氣燃燒塔方面，依據每日上傳之監測資料進行統計，102年離島工業區廢氣燃燒塔上傳流量數據。以各廢氣燃燒塔統計，廢氣排放總流量前三大分別為塑化麥寮一廠輕油廠之AR03，總流量76,961 km3；其次為塑化麥寮三廠之OL-3廠之A203，總流量30,728 km3；再其次為塑化麥寮一廠輕油廠之AR04，總流量27,661 km3；現場訊號比對查核，完成44根次，完成率100%，其測試結果訊號均屬良好。
中文關鍵字	連續自動監測設施，相對準確度測試查核，標準氣體查核

中文摘要

本計畫執行工作項目中，監測設施新增及汰換審查作業，協助環保局針對管道設置監測設施及連線設施之申請審查共計6廠22根煙道，汰換項目包含：不透光率、二氧化硫、氮氧化物、一氧化碳、氧氣及排放流率等污染物分析監測儀與數據擷取程式之計算電腦汰換，且完成台化海豐廠(芳香烴三廠)M07製程PG02管道之新設監測設施審查。數據檢核方面，統計102年上傳監測數據，氣狀污染物共16根有超限紀錄，但102年日超限總筆數均不超過2筆。不透光率部份，則有22根煙道有超限紀錄，以麥寮汽電P101超限筆數最多，但每日累計能仍未超過40筆，均未超過法規規範之累積時數限值。系統與功能查核方面，本計畫共計完成進行34根次的現場法規符合度查核，完成率100%，依照各廠提送之設施確認報告書及監測數據品質保證計畫書進行現場系統查核，查核結果無明顯涉及罰則之違規，針對建議改善項目亦現場輔導改善，且不定時至各廠進行後續追蹤作業；另功能查核之Zero/Span查核完成34根次，完成率達100%以上；RATA監督檢測完成34根次，完成率達100%以上；CGA查核完成34根次，完成率達100%以上；不透光率校正誤差查核完成31根次，完成率達100%以上；NO2/NO轉化器效率完成20根次，完成率達100%。稽查檢測方面，RATA稽查檢測完成20根次，完成率100%，監測結果所有測項RA值均符合標準，但其中塑化麥寮三廠(公用廠) PA01、PC01管道、塑化麥寮二廠(公用廠) P401、塑化麥寮一廠(輕油廠) PT01、PS01管道、台化海豐廠(芳香烴三廠) PG01管道等其部分測項均發生檢測結果之差值平均值≧信賴係數(CC)，故須做BAF修正，已提報環保局辦理要求該廠依管理辦法附錄九進行系統偏移之校正計算並重新補正上傳期間之監測數據，以更新線上資料庫數據。廢氣燃燒塔方面，依據每日上傳之監測資料進行統計，102年離島工業區廢氣燃燒塔上傳流量數據。以各廢氣燃燒塔統計，廢氣排放總流量前三大分別為塑化麥寮一廠輕油廠之AR03，總流量76,961 km3；其次為塑化麥寮三廠之OL-3廠之A203，總流量30,728 km3；再其次為塑化麥寮一廠輕油廠之AR04，總流量27,661 km3；現場訊號比對查核，完成44根次，完成率100%，其測試結果訊號均屬良好。

中文關鍵字

連續自動監測設施，相對準確度測試查核，標準氣體查核

類型	檔名	檔案大小	說明	最新版公開日期
期末報告	102年度離島工業區連續自動監測設施查核計畫期末報告.pdf	66MB	102年度離島工業區連續自動監測設施查核計畫期末報告	2015/5/1 上午 12:00:00

摘要	In this project implementations of monitoring facilities added and replaced that assisted the Environmental Protection Bureau with aimming to set up monitoring facilities and apply for examining connected facilities on 22 flues at six plants. Replacements included the pollutant analytic monitoring instruments and the computer of running data capturing program on opacity, SO2, NOx, CO, O2 and effluent rate, etc. Completed review also included the new monitoring facility on duct PG02 of Process M07 at Haifong Plant of Formosa Chemicals ＆ Fibre Corp. (3rd Aromatic hydrocarbons plant). In data checking, we made statistics on the monitoring data uploaded in 2013. With gaseous pollutants, there were 16 exceeding records of flues but no more than two exceeding record of total records per day in 2013. Regarding opacity, there are 22 exceeding records of flues which the most is P101 of Mailiao Power Corporation. But there were no more 40 exceeding records accumulated daily that is not in excess of limit in legal norms. Regarding system and function checking, the project completed the check of on-site legal compliance for all 34 flue gas sources with 100% completion. We conducted on-site system check based on the verification report of facility and the plan of monitoring data quality assurance submitted by each plant and found no apparent violations that would involve penalties. On the improvement projects of suggestions, we give advises to improve on the site as well as made follow-ups from time to time at the plants. Function checks on 34 flue gas sources on Zero/Span achieved over 100%. RATA monitoring checks on 34 flue gas sources also achieved 100% mark. CGA checks on 34 flue gas sources marked 100% as well. Opacity error correction checks on 31 flue gas sources achieved over 100% completion. NO2/NO converter efficiency was checked on 20 flue gas sources, marking 100% completion. In audit detection, RATA audit detected on 20 flue gas sources marked 100% completion. All of the RA value in monitoring results comply with the criteria, except parts of detected items resulted in mean of differences greater than coefficient of confidence; these were on Ducts PA01 and PC01 of Formosa Petrochemical Corp.’s 3rd Mailiao Plant (public utility), P401 at 2nd Mailiao Plant (public utility), Ducts PT01 and PS01 at 1st Mailiao Plant (Naphtha plant), and Duct PG01 at Formosa Chemicals ＆ Fibre Corp.’s Haifong Plant (3rd Aromatic hydrocarbons plant), which needed BAF correction. Those we have reported to EPB for requiring the plants to make calculation of system deviation correction according to Appendix 9 to the Regulations and to correct monitoring data during the uploading period again for updating the online data in the database. Regarding flare tower, we made statistics on the monitoring data uploaded on daily basis according to the 2013 uploaded flow of the flare towers in the Offshore industrial park. The statistics showed that the top three total emissions of exhaust came from AR03 at the 1st Mailiao (Naphtha) Plant of Formosa Petrochemical Corp. at 76,961 km3, followed by A203 at OL-3 Plant of the 3rd Mailiao Plant at 30,728 km3, and AR04 at 1st Mailiao (Naphtha) Plant at 27,661 km3. We checked on-site signal comparison on 44 flue gas sources with 100% completion, and found signals all good.
英文關鍵字	Continuous Emission Monitoring System, Relative Accuracy Test Audit, Cylinder Gas Audit

摘要

In this project implementations of monitoring facilities added and replaced that assisted the Environmental Protection Bureau with aimming to set up monitoring facilities and apply for examining connected facilities on 22 flues at six plants. Replacements included the pollutant analytic monitoring instruments and the computer of running data capturing program on opacity, SO2, NOx, CO, O2 and effluent rate, etc. Completed review also included the new monitoring facility on duct PG02 of Process M07 at Haifong Plant of Formosa Chemicals ＆ Fibre Corp. (3rd Aromatic hydrocarbons plant). In data checking, we made statistics on the monitoring data uploaded in 2013. With gaseous pollutants, there were 16 exceeding records of flues but no more than two exceeding record of total records per day in 2013. Regarding opacity, there are 22 exceeding records of flues which the most is P101 of Mailiao Power Corporation. But there were no more 40 exceeding records accumulated daily that is not in excess of limit in legal norms. Regarding system and function checking, the project completed the check of on-site legal compliance for all 34 flue gas sources with 100% completion. We conducted on-site system check based on the verification report of facility and the plan of monitoring data quality assurance submitted by each plant and found no apparent violations that would involve penalties. On the improvement projects of suggestions, we give advises to improve on the site as well as made follow-ups from time to time at the plants. Function checks on 34 flue gas sources on Zero/Span achieved over 100%. RATA monitoring checks on 34 flue gas sources also achieved 100% mark. CGA checks on 34 flue gas sources marked 100% as well. Opacity error correction checks on 31 flue gas sources achieved over 100% completion. NO2/NO converter efficiency was checked on 20 flue gas sources, marking 100% completion. In audit detection, RATA audit detected on 20 flue gas sources marked 100% completion. All of the RA value in monitoring results comply with the criteria, except parts of detected items resulted in mean of differences greater than coefficient of confidence; these were on Ducts PA01 and PC01 of Formosa Petrochemical Corp.’s 3rd Mailiao Plant (public utility), P401 at 2nd Mailiao Plant (public utility), Ducts PT01 and PS01 at 1st Mailiao Plant (Naphtha plant), and Duct PG01 at Formosa Chemicals ＆ Fibre Corp.’s Haifong Plant (3rd Aromatic hydrocarbons plant), which needed BAF correction. Those we have reported to EPB for requiring the plants to make calculation of system deviation correction according to Appendix 9 to the Regulations and to correct monitoring data during the uploading period again for updating the online data in the database. Regarding flare tower, we made statistics on the monitoring data uploaded on daily basis according to the 2013 uploaded flow of the flare towers in the Offshore industrial park. The statistics showed that the top three total emissions of exhaust came from AR03 at the 1st Mailiao (Naphtha) Plant of Formosa Petrochemical Corp. at 76,961 km3, followed by A203 at OL-3 Plant of the 3rd Mailiao Plant at 30,728 km3, and AR04 at 1st Mailiao (Naphtha) Plant at 27,661 km3. We checked on-site signal comparison on 44 flue gas sources with 100% completion, and found signals all good.

英文關鍵字

Continuous Emission Monitoring System, Relative Accuracy Test Audit, Cylinder Gas Audit