EPA-102-U1K1-02-201

102

2,390 千元

2013/02/25

2013/12/31

林建宏

管考處

邱慈娟

財團法人環境與發展基金會

科技計畫

環保標章、規格標準、環境效益評估

Green Mark、criteria、evaluation of environmental benefit

林建宏

03-5916215#

kuakua@edf.org.tw

本計畫共完成原生碳粉匣、使用再生紙之紙製文具及書寫用紙、回收木材再生品、開飲機、飲水供應機、食品包裝用塑膠薄膜、省能源精緻燈管、多功能事務機、電視機、監視器、墨水筆、聚烯類藥用輸液容器計12項規格標準修正草案，以及完成烘手機、電熱水壺、電梯、肥皂、LED燈泡(非指向型)、轎車用輪胎、抽油煙機計7項規格標準草案。環境效益評估上，針對開飲機、飲水供應機、使用回收紙之辦公室自動化(OA)用紙、回收木材再生品及水性塗料計5項產品，予以設定使用情境，計算其環境效益評估指數，以供民眾了解其採購貢獻的環保效益。國內外環保標章資訊收集部分，共完成12篇研析報告，供政策決策之參考，此外，為使前述工作順利完成，共召開20場審查相關會議，14場相關說明會議，並協助專家委員審查檢測機構2件申請檢測項目認可登錄案及1場次實驗室現場查核、完成環境保護產品與「生態女性主義」相關課程1場次及環境保護產品檢測業者之說明會1場次，以及相關環保標章制度檢討作業。 經綜合評估執行成果，就短長期建議上，短期建議持續辦理收集各國規格標準方向並增加我國產品類型廣泛度、增加獎勵措施、辦理各類說明會及宣傳活動、持續掌握國際標章趨勢並參與國際組織活動、持續收集EPEAT動向納入檢討環保標章之雙軌制度，並建議採納業界主動提出規格標準建議案，納入研擬修正。長期建議立法收取年費，落實完善追蹤查核工作，與深根環境教育課程。

環保標章、規格標準、環境效益評估

EPA-102-U1K1-02-201期末報告.pdf

7MB

2014/2/1 上午 12:00:00

This year’s project has revised 12 product criteria: original toner cartridges, stationery and writing paper made from recycled paper, products made from recycled wood, water dispensers, water fountains, plastic film for food packaging, fluorescent lamps, multi-function devices, televisions, monitors, pens, and poly-alkene IV containers; and developed the drafts for 7 new product criteria: hand dryers, electric kettles, elevators, soaps, LED bulbs (non-directional), passenger car tires, and kitchen hoods. With regard to assessment of environmental benefits, this project has assumed the usage conditions and calculated the environmental benefit assessment indicators for five product categories (water dispensers, water fountains, office paper made from recycled paper, products made from recycled wood, and water-based paints), so that consumers may understand the environmental benefits resulting from their purchasing activities. On collection of domestic and foreign eco-labeling information, twelve informational and analytical reports have been prepared to serve as reference information for decision makers. In order to facilitate the implementation of the above tasks, 20 Green Mark review meetings and 14 Green Mark information seminars were also held. One onsite audit to a laboratory and reviews of 2 un-accreditated test accreditation applications were conducted to help with the Green Mark Committee’s decision making. In addition, one training course was offered on green product and eco-feminism, one training seminar was offered to testing organizations for environmental protection products, and a review on the operations of Green Mark Program have also been conducted. After comprehensive review and assessment of the Green Mark Program’s implementation results, both short-term and long-term recommendations have been proposed. The short-term recommendations include continuing to collect information on other eco-labeling programs’ product criteria in order to expand the scope of Green Mark’s product categories, increasing financial incentives for adopting Green Mark products, organizing various eco-labeling promotional seminars and activities, continuing to follow international eco-labeling trend and attend activities of international organizations, gathering information on EPEAT activities for consideration as a dual-track scheme while reviewing Green Mark Program, allowing stakeholders and industry to propose draft Green Mark product criteria for criteria revision consideration. Long-term recommendations include initiating collection of annual fee through revision of Green Mark legislation, enhancing current follow-up surveillance efforts, and improving environmental awareness educational curricula.

Green Mark、criteria、evaluation of environmental benefit