EPA-103-HA14-03-A088

103

4,650 千元

2014/03/13

2014/12/31

王家祥

回收基管會

廖保雲

毅泰管理顧問股份有限公司

廢棄物管理

流布調查，鉛含量測試，輪胎及鉛蓄電池產業發展，碳排放係數

Flow circumstance investigation，Lead content testing，Development of tire and lead-acid battery industry， carbon emission factor

溫麗琪;陳偉聖

林浩業

02-29533590#610

howyae@gmail.com

本計畫完成工作共有6大項，以下分述各工作結果。 第一，根據國際資料蒐集，廢輪胎再利用方式會隨國家產業技術發展有所不同，亞洲地區係以能源利用為主，英國與美國因再生橡膠技術發展成熟，有比較高的物質利用比率。廢鉛蓄電池再利用用途各個國家大致相同，均以製成再生鉛為主。 第二，在中國大陸地區參訪行程中發現，大陸地區目前再生橡膠及再生鉛的需求逐漸提高，後端再生料販售價格也相對比臺灣高，主要原因為汽車工業發展，導致需求量及料源價格都較高。 第三，補貼費率檢討以受補貼機構稅籍資料估算，結果為廢輪胎回收清除處理淨成本平均值為3.49元/公斤；而廢鉛蓄電池因再生料經濟價值高，故以反映污染防制估算成本，並和緩調降幅度，結果為一般/特用分別為1.23/3.52元/公斤。分級補貼係透過前述重新檢討結果進行後續推算，廢輪胎受補貼機構指標為再生料使用別及環境面，分成2級，分別為現行補貼3.2元/公斤及提高補貼費率，範圍為3.69~3.83元/公斤；廢鉛蓄電池部分則為資源化再利用、提升破碎技術及提升鉛熔煉技術為主，分成3級，分別為現行補貼費率(以前述重新檢討為基礎)，一般/特用：1.23/3.52元/公斤，在提高補貼費率部分，次高為1.44~1.60/3.73~3.89元/公斤，最高為1.50~1.74/3.79~4.03元/公斤。 第四，廢棄物流布調查分析方面，103年結果以汽車百貨業者占廢輪胎產生源比例為最大宗，占比27.6%，廢鉛蓄電池則以電機行為多，占比23.6%。另執行比較國外計算方式推算回收率，比例上已相差無幾。並與專家諮詢且循用以往調查之經驗，已規劃流布盤查方法與建置標準作業流程圖，以供環保署後續作業參酌。 第五，鉛產品採樣分析檢測以2種採樣2種檢測制定4個方案，並建立檢測方式，以XRF檢測數據應對在我國公告之標準檢測方法之AA法(誤差在±5%內)。 最後，本計畫參考我國「產品與服務碳足跡計算指引」及英國BSI「PAS 2050」規範，針對再生料碳排放盤查，結果為膠片：0.062 KgCO2e/Kg、膠粉：0.131 KgCO2e/Kg、鋼絲：0.360 KgCO2e/Kg、ABS塑膠：0.120 KgCO2e/Kg、PP塑膠：0.151 KgCO2e/Kg，及鉛錠：0.767 KgCO2e/Kg。

流布調查，鉛含量測試，輪胎及鉛蓄電池產業發展，碳排放係數

EPA -103-HA14-03-A088.pdf(公開版).pdf

7MB

EPA -103-HA14-03-A088.pdf 公開版本

2015/5/1 上午 12:00:00

This project has completed six subjects, and results can be found in following description: Firstly, according to secondary data, waste tire recycling processes would be based on developing technology among different countries, such as energy recovery was focused in Asia; the United Kingdom and U.S.A would concentrate on material recovery due to high developing technology of recycling rubber. The waste lead-acid battery recycling processes were similar among most investigated countries; it would be manufactured to secondary lead. Secondly, during the China visiting, we discovered that China had increasingly secondary rubber and secondary lead requirements due to rising car industry; therefore, the price of secondary material was higher than selling in Taiwan. Thirdly, we calculated subsidy for subsidized recycler by tax document in place of questionnaire. The unit cost was 3.49 NTD to treat a kilogram of waste tire. For treating waste lead-acid battery, the recycling material earning was higher than cost, so we changed to estimate the cost of pollutant control. After calculating, the cost was 1.23 and 3.52 NTD/kg for general and large lead-acid battery, separately. In order to assist to develop treatment ability of subsidized recycler, the project studied subsidy classification system. For waste tire recycler, the recycling material and environmental protection were installed standard to qualify better factory. Qualified factory could get subsidy around 3.69~3.83 NTD/kg which was higher than original subsidy, 3.2 NTD/kg. For waste lead-acid battery recycler, recycling material rate, smash equipment and refine facilities were installed standard to classify 3 levels. The subsidy of best level was around 1.50~1.74/3.79~4.03 NTD/kg (general/large battery); the secondary was around 1.44~1.60/3.73~3.89 NTD/kg (general/large battery); the third which was original was 1.23/3.52 NTD/kg (general/large battery). Fourthly, in waste material flow investigation aspect, the mainly 27.6% waste tire were from auto parts and accessories, and 23.6% waste lead-acid batteries were from electronic and battery store. In contrast with other countries, collection percentage of Taiwan had been similar. After consulting with professional and following past investigation experience, material flow investigation methodology and standard operation procedure were established to provide RFMB to practice further research. Fifthly, the purity of recycling lead example analysis was based on two sampling and two testing (XRF and AA) to formula 4 research programs. The result of XRF testing method was close to AA method (error in ±5%) which were announced by Taiwan EPA. Finally, this project referred to “product and service carbon footprint calculation guide” from Taiwan and “PAS 2050 guide” from BSI standard to focus on secondary material carbon emission investigation, as a result, the pieces of recycling rubber shred: 0.062 KgCO2e/Kg, recycling rubber powder: 0.131 KgCO2e/Kg, recycling wire: 0.360 KgCO2e/Kg, recycling plastic (ABS): 0.120 KgCO2e/Kg, recycling plastic (pp): 0.151 KgCO2e/Kg, and secondary lead: 0.767 KgCO2e/Kg.

Flow circumstance investigation，Lead content testing，Development of tire and lead-acid battery industry， carbon emission factor