EPA-104-J104-02-101

104

3,700 千元

2015/01/01

2015/12/31

何大成

環管處

李慧玲

財團法人工業技術研究院

化學物質管理

緊急應變、毒性化學物質、毒災聯防

Emergency Response, Toxic Chemical, Mutual Aid

陳新友

周文怡

049-2345601#

wenyi@itri.org.tw

於設置環境事故專業諮詢監控中心方面，依據業務屬性則區分為行政組、監控組、諮詢組、空污小組以及技術組等5小組，本中心於平時預防整備執行成果包括媒體監控案件總計1,294件（國內監控336件，國外監控958件）以及化學相關諮詢服務案件計159件，總計完成1,453件（合約要求至少1,000件以上），空氣污染事件監控通報案件計305件，通報環保署業務單位共108件次；變時應變處置執行成果包括完成43場次環境事故處理作業，提供現場救災單位237點建議，30分鐘內發送第1則簡訊（發送次數為15,494次，簡訊接收率為99%），達成率為100 %（合約要求至少90%以上）。修訂「環境事故專業諮詢監控中心環境災害應變作業手冊」與「中央災害應變中心作業手冊」，並召開「104年度工作範疇會議暨毒災防救工作協調會」與「應變作業網路會議」計有19場次，更新308筆「毒災中央災害應變中心」各相關人員基本資料以及電話通聯測試（1,089人次，通聯成功比例100%）以及建置48位環境事故諮詢與空氣污染應變專家群，並進行電話通聯測試與資料更新。 於推動環境災害防救國外專家學者交流方面，於5、6月分別至國外參與斯德哥爾摩公約第七次締約國大會、IAFC研討會以及參訪美國德拉瓦州消防學院訓練設施與馬里蘭州環境部，辦理4場次國外專家學者交流訓練會議，參與人次為325人次，應變交流會議則邀請日本、韓國以及新加坡等4位專家與會交流分享，辦理訓練國際專業機構辦理應變指揮官專業訓練，參訓對象包括行政院災害防救辦公室、國發會、經濟部工業局、內政部消防署、環管處、環境督察總隊、縣市環境保護局局長、副局長、環境事故專業諮詢監控中心、環境事故專業技術小組以及區域型聯防組織組長等單位，總參訓人數為26人，並獲得NFPA和OSHA認證課程之合格證書 於強化國內環境事故預防與整備能量方面，完成305種列管毒化物資料庫更新作業以及發行3期環境事故簡訊電子報，發行份數共計10,759份，總瀏覽人數累積為615,231人次；完成美國「緊急計畫與社區知情權法案」研析會議，計有82人參與；辦理12梯次訓練課程，其內容涵蓋通識操作級、技術專業級、帶隊官以及環保署撥發儀器設備等項目，總參訓人數為467人次；完成環境事故分析檢測數值查核完成20場次，計870筆監測數值；辦理毒性化學物質聯防運作管理績優活動，計有16個單位獲獎；於高雄國際會議中心辦理全國環境事故案例研討會，主題包括毒化物聯防組織運作管理績優頒獎表揚典禮、全國毒化物事故案例研討及應變資材展覽等3個項目，總計參與人數為436人。 於強化運作業者聯防整備量能方面，全國性聯防組織包括跨區域聯防98組841家、北中南區聯防3組4,351家以及國防部1組37家，制訂聯防推動策略包括推動會議、組織精進、能量驗證及成果發表等四項主題。辦理跨區域運作聯防組織與北中南區區域型聯防組織說明會，總計參與人數為207人次；配合聯防運作管理績優活動、組織訓練以及運作模式觀摩，總計完成33場次實場運作演練，參與人數為723人次；於高風險運作區域危害評析與落實廠場運作安全管理方面，製作8個高風險運作區域危害模擬研析及疏散避難作業之技術資料，包括1,703模擬情境與786圖層記錄，辦理7場次高風險毒性化學物質運作工業區訓練課程，共計171人次參與訓練，針對新北市、臺中市以及臺南市中小企業辦理運作廠場毒化物運作安全管理輔導訪視，計執行42場次輔導訪視工作，並完成追蹤改善工作，成果均鍵入於毒災防救管理資訊系統。

緊急應變、毒性化學物質、毒災聯防

104年諮詢監控中心期末報告定稿本(公開版)及摘要.pdf

5MB

2016/3/1 上午 12:00:00

The dedicated environmental accident consulting and monitoring center has five groups focusing on particular service areas: an administrative group, monitoring group, consulting group, air pollution task force, and technology group. This center's routine prevention and readiness implementation results included 1,294 media monitoring cases (including 336 domestic cases and 958 foreign cases) and 159 chemical consulting cases, for a total of 1,453 cases (the contractual requirement is at least 1,000 cases), as well as 305 air pollution incident monitoring and notification cases, and 108 notifications of the EPA's service units. In addition, emergency response and disposal results included on-site handling of 43 toxic chemical accidents, provision of 237 recommendations to on-site disaster response units (attainment rate of 100% for a first text message within 30 minutes; the contractual requirement is at least 90%), and seven "technology group work conference report and response videoconferences," and eight "online response task conferences," updated 308 relevant basic personal information items connected with the Central Toxic Disaster Response Center and performed telephone connection testing (1,089 person-times; the connection success rate was 100%), established 48 environmental accident consulting and air pollution response expert teams. With regard to promotion of interchange with foreign environmental accident prevention and response experts and researchers, during May and June, we participated in the Tenth Meeting of the Persistent Organic Pollutants Review Committee (COP7) and an IAFC conference, visited the Delaware Fire Safety Institute training facility and the Maryland Environmental Protection Department, and held four interchange and training conferences for foreign experts. A total of 325 persons participated in these events. Four specialists from Japan, Korea, and Singapore were invited to share their knowledge at a response interchange conference. International professional organizations involved in training conducted professional training for response command officers; personnel receiving training included or were affiliated with the Office of Disaster Management, Executive Yuan; National Development Council; Industrial Development Bureau, MOEA; Fire Control Administration, Environmental Protection Administration; Environmental Incidents Specialist Team; chiefs and deputy chiefs of city and county environmental protection bureaus; Emergency Response Information Center; Environmental Accident Technology Group; and the section heads of regional joint prevention organizations. A total of 26 persons took part in training, and received NFPA and OSHA certificates. In order to strengthen domestic environmental accident prevention and readiness capabilities, we completed annual updates for 305 regulated toxic chemical substances and issued three environmental accident text message e-bulletins; a total of 10,759 e-bulletins were issued and the cumulative number of browsers totaled 615,231 person-times. We held a study conference on the US "Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act" that had 82 participants, and conducted 12 training class sessions with content including general knowledge operating grade, technological specialization grade, team leader skills, and EPA-issued instruments and equipment; the latter training classes had a total of 467 participants. We further completed checking of analytical and testing data for 20 environmental accidents, which yielded 870 sets of monitoring data. We held a toxic chemical substance joint prevention outstanding operation management activity in which 16 units received awards. We conducted a national environmental accident case symposium at the Kaohsiung International Conference Center; the three activities at this event included an awards ceremony for toxic chemical substances joint prevention organizations with outstanding operations management, discussion of toxic chemical substance accident cases in Taiwan, and an exhibition of response resources; participants numbered 436 persons. Efforts to strengthen chemical handlers' joint prevention readiness capabilities, focused on 98 inter-regional joint prevention organizations encompassing 841 members, three regional joint prevention organizations (in northern, central, and southern Taiwan) encompassing 4,351 members, and the Ministry of National Defense joint prevention organization with 37 members. Our four major joint prevention promotion strategies constitute promotional conferences, organizational improvement, capability verification, and results announcement. We held explanatory meetings for inter-regional joint prevention organizations and the northern, central, and southern regional joint prevention organizations; a total of 207 persons attended these events. In conjunction with outstanding joint prevention operations management activities, organizational training, and operating model workshops, we completed 33 on-site operations exercises involving a total of 723 participants. With regard to plant operation safety management and hazard assessment in high-risk operating areas, we compiled hazard modeling studies and evacuate operation data for eight high-risk operating areas, including 1,703 scenarios and 786 map overlay records, conducted seven training classes in industrial areas where high-risk toxic chemical substance handling occurred, and a total of 171 persons took part in this training. We performed a total of 42 toxic chemical substance handling safety management assistance visits to SMEs in New Taipei, Taichung, and Tainan, and completed tracking of improvements; the results have been entered into the toxic chemical accident prevention management information system.

Emergency Response, Toxic Chemical, Mutual Aid