EPA-104-K102-02-105

104

1,850 千元

2015/07/27

2015/12/31

陳靖原

管考處

王瑞鋐

財團法人環境與發展基金會

科技計畫

環保標章、綠色產品、環境效益

Ecolabelling, Green Product, Environment Benefit

林建宏

曾偉綸

03-5916249#

victor@edf.org.tw

本計畫目標在於評估我國環境保護產品可貢獻之實際環境效益，並利用評估結果向大眾說明歷年推動環保標章與各項綠色消費與綠色採購政策之成效，另一方面也利用本計畫之執行成果，回饋予環保標章與各項綠色消費與綠色採購計畫，以做為政策精進之參考。 為達前述目標，本計畫迄今已選定利用九項環境績效評估項目評估各類環保產品之環境績效。再依環保標章基本精神，將其整合為「低污染」、「節省使用費」、「使用再生材料」三大分項，並計算環保標章產品規格標準之單一數值環境效益指數。 而為執行「低污染」項目之產品環境績效評估，本計劃參考聯合國GHS化學品全球調和制度對化學品之危害程度分類，進行各類衝擊之評分，再配合各類化學品之安全資料表危害辨識資料內容，計算各環保標章管制化學品之危害總分，並據以評估各環保標章產品規格標準，因減少有害物質所達成之「低污染」環境績效。 而於「節省使用費」、「使用再生材料」部分，本計劃參考國際間其他綠色產品評價系統或是外國環保標章作法，以實際使用之再生原料重量比，與實際節省之產品使用成本，計算其環境績效。 為達成本計畫一方面作為成果說明資料，另一方面又須做為政策精進參考之雙重目標，本計畫整合環保產品之各項目績效統計結果，與計算所得之單一數值環境效益指數，再以雷達圖標明產品於「低污染」、「節省使用費」、「使用再生材料」三部分之環境績效配比，以提供重要之產品環境效益資訊。

環保標章、綠色產品、環境效益

104年度環境保護產品環境效益評估專案工作期末報告.pdf

33MB

2016/3/1 上午 12:00:00

The goal of this project is to assess the actual environmental benefits reaped through promoting the environmental protection products (“green products”) in the Republic of China, and use the assessment results to communicate to the general public the effects and achievements of implementing the Green Mark Program and government green purchasing policies over the years. The outcomes of this project may also be used to provide feedback to the Green Mark Program and various green consumption and purchasing initiatives, and serve as important inputs for future environmental policy review and improvement process. In order to achieve the above goal, the project has chosen to use nine environmental performance indicators in assessing the environmental performance of various green products. These nine indicators were grouped into three categories (low pollution, operation cost saving, and recycled material content), and used to calculate a single environmental benefit score in accordance with the requirements in specific Green Mark product criteria. For the product environmental performance evaluation of the low pollution category, the hazard classifications adopted in the United Nations’ Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) were used as the basis for defining environmental impacts and assigning specific impact scores. The GHS classifications together with the chemical hazard information from the material safety data sheets (MSDS) of specific chemical substances regulated by the Green Mark product criteria, were then used to calculate the total impact score of each chemical. After summing up the individual impact scores of all chemical substances regulated in a specific Green Mark criteria, the low pollution environmental performance due to implementing the requirement of reducing hazardous substances in the specific Green Mark criteria can be quantified. As for the environmental performance in the operation cost saving, and recycled material content categories, this project referred to the approaches adopted by other green product evaluation systems and ecolabeling schemes. The actual content ratios of recycled materials and the resulting cost savings due to the use of recycled materials were used to calculate the environmental performance of specific green products in both categories. In order for the project results to be used both for achievement communication purpose and as inputs for policy review, the environmental performance statistics of the various green products were integrated with the environmental performance scores calculated in this study. A radar chart was used to demonstrate the comparisons of the product’s environmental performance in the low pollution, operation cost saving, and recycled material content categories and presented the key parts of product environmental benefit information.

Ecolabelling, Green Product, Environment Benefit