環保專案成果報告查詢系統

專案計畫編號	EPA-104-J105-02-101
經費年度	104
計畫經費	3,940 千元
專案開始日期	2015/03/04
專案結束日期	2015/12/31
專案主持人	賴映方
主辦單位	環管處
承辦人	高俊璿
執行單位	中環科技事業股份有限公司
專案分類	水質保護、環境衛生、環境監測及檢測
中文關鍵字	飲用水水質標準、總三鹵甲烷、重金屬
英文關鍵字	Drinking Water Quality Standards, Total Trihalomethane, Heavy Metals
協同主持人
共同主持人
計畫聯絡人	林柏亦
計畫聯絡電話	07-8152248#
計畫聯絡信箱	braden.pylin@cenprotech.com

中文摘要	本計畫主要針對全國22個直轄市及縣市行政轄區362處自來水供水系統及38處簡易自來水檢測點進行飲用水水質中較難檢驗項目之抽驗，其分析項目包括47項列管項目及24項非列管項目，共計71項水質項目之現況背景資料。列管項目包括13項重金屬（砷、鉛、硒、鉻、鎘、鋇、銻、鎳、汞、銀、銦、鉬、鋁）、1項影響健康物質（氰鹽）、4項消毒副產物（總三鹵甲烷、亞氯酸鹽、溴酸鹽、5種鹵乙酸類HAA5）、15項揮發性有機物（三氯乙烯、四氯化碳、1,1,1-三氯乙烷、1,2-二氯乙烷、氯乙烯、苯、對-二氯苯、1,1-二氯乙烯、二氯甲烷、鄰-二氯苯、二甲苯、順1,2-二氯乙烯、反1,2-二氯乙烯、四氯乙烯、甲苯）、13項農藥（安殺番、靈丹、丁基拉草、2,4-地、巴拉刈、納乃得、加保扶、滅必蝨、達馬松、大利松、巴拉松、一品松、亞素靈）、1項持久性有機污染物（戴奧辛）等共47項。　　非列管項目包括3項重金屬（六價鉻、鎵、鉈）、3項消毒副產物（二氯乙腈、二溴乙腈、水合氯醛）、7項揮發性有機物（1,1-二氯乙烷、1,2-二氯丙烷、苯乙烯、氯苯、乙苯、甲醛、甲基第三丁基醚）、8項環境荷爾蒙（壬基酚、雙酚A、鄰苯二甲酸二甲酯(DMP)、鄰苯二甲酸二乙酯(DEP)、鄰苯二甲酸二丁酯(DBP)、鄰苯二甲酸丁苯酯(BBP)、鄰苯二甲酸二辛酯(DNOP)、鄰苯二甲酸二（2-乙基己基）酯(DEHP)）、1項生物代謝產物（微囊藻毒LR型）、2項微生物（糞便性大腸桿菌群、大腸桿菌）等共24項。 104年度共完成抽驗自來水供水系統法規列管項目6,025項次及非列管項目1,350項次，簡易自來水則完成抽驗法規列管項目513項次及非列管項目81項次。由104年度監測結果發現，自來水及簡易自來水供水系統之檢測點中列管項目氰鹽、亞氯酸鹽、溴酸鹽、三氯乙烯、四氯化碳、1,1,1-三氯乙烷、1,2-二氯乙烷、氯乙烯、苯、對-二氯苯、1,1-二氯乙烯、二氯甲烷、鄰-二氯苯、二甲苯、順-1,2-二氯乙烯、反-1,2-二氯乙烯、四氯乙烯、甲苯、安殺番、靈丹、丁基拉草、2,4-地、巴拉刈、納乃得、加保扶、滅必蝨、達馬松、大利松、巴拉松、一品松、亞素靈等項之檢測結果皆小於偵測極限或定量極限。本年度水質抽驗合格率（合格率之統計係以檢驗分析數據與水質標準管制限值比較之結果判定，未剔除陳述意見或訴願後撤銷之案件），以檢測點而言，除彰化縣TTW-I10（員林第二淨水場）及高雄市TTW-O21（路竹淨水場）測點之水質合格率（合格項數/監測項數）分別為96.4%(27/28)及97.1%(33/34)外，其餘各檢測點之水質合格率皆為100.0%；而就測項而言，除鉛及鹵乙酸類HAA5之檢測點合格率分別為99.8%(399/400)及99.1%(109/110)外，其餘各檢測點之檢測項目合格率皆為100.0%。針對非列管項目，除甲醛、二氯乙腈、二溴乙腈、水合氯醛、糞便性大腸桿菌群、大腸桿菌等測項外，其餘測項之檢測結果均小於偵測極限或定量極限值。　　針對103年度及104年4～8月超標或臨標測點、鋁測值超過0.2 mg/L、各相關檢驗項目中檢驗數據較歷年偏高之淨水場測點，於104年9～10月進行複測追蹤。由監測結果發現臺中市TTW-G02（豐原第二淨水場）鋁測項、臺東縣TTW-T30（綠島淨水場）之總三鹵甲烷，以及苗栗縣TTW-F09（明德淨水場）之鹵乙酸類仍有超過 0.7 倍管制標準，其餘測點均有明顯改善且均已符合飲用水水質標準；而高雄市路竹淨水場之鹵乙酸類則於本階段超過飲用水水質標準。
中文關鍵字	飲用水水質標準、總三鹵甲烷、重金屬

中文摘要

　　本計畫主要針對全國22個直轄市及縣市行政轄區362處自來水供水系統及38處簡易自來水檢測點進行飲用水水質中較難檢驗項目之抽驗，其分析項目包括47項列管項目及24項非列管項目，共計71項水質項目之現況背景資料。列管項目包括13項重金屬（砷、鉛、硒、鉻、鎘、鋇、銻、鎳、汞、銀、銦、鉬、鋁）、1項影響健康物質（氰鹽）、4項消毒副產物（總三鹵甲烷、亞氯酸鹽、溴酸鹽、5種鹵乙酸類HAA5）、15項揮發性有機物（三氯乙烯、四氯化碳、1,1,1-三氯乙烷、1,2-二氯乙烷、氯乙烯、苯、對-二氯苯、1,1-二氯乙烯、二氯甲烷、鄰-二氯苯、二甲苯、順1,2-二氯乙烯、反1,2-二氯乙烯、四氯乙烯、甲苯）、13項農藥（安殺番、靈丹、丁基拉草、2,4-地、巴拉刈、納乃得、加保扶、滅必蝨、達馬松、大利松、巴拉松、一品松、亞素靈）、1項持久性有機污染物（戴奧辛）等共47項。　　非列管項目包括3項重金屬（六價鉻、鎵、鉈）、3項消毒副產物（二氯乙腈、二溴乙腈、水合氯醛）、7項揮發性有機物（1,1-二氯乙烷、1,2-二氯丙烷、苯乙烯、氯苯、乙苯、甲醛、甲基第三丁基醚）、8項環境荷爾蒙（壬基酚、雙酚A、鄰苯二甲酸二甲酯(DMP)、鄰苯二甲酸二乙酯(DEP)、鄰苯二甲酸二丁酯(DBP)、鄰苯二甲酸丁苯酯(BBP)、鄰苯二甲酸二辛酯(DNOP)、鄰苯二甲酸二（2-乙基己基）酯(DEHP)）、1項生物代謝產物（微囊藻毒LR型）、2項微生物（糞便性大腸桿菌群、大腸桿菌）等共24項。 104年度共完成抽驗自來水供水系統法規列管項目6,025項次及非列管項目1,350項次，簡易自來水則完成抽驗法規列管項目513項次及非列管項目81項次。由104年度監測結果發現，自來水及簡易自來水供水系統之檢測點中列管項目氰鹽、亞氯酸鹽、溴酸鹽、三氯乙烯、四氯化碳、1,1,1-三氯乙烷、1,2-二氯乙烷、氯乙烯、苯、對-二氯苯、1,1-二氯乙烯、二氯甲烷、鄰-二氯苯、二甲苯、順-1,2-二氯乙烯、反-1,2-二氯乙烯、四氯乙烯、甲苯、安殺番、靈丹、丁基拉草、2,4-地、巴拉刈、納乃得、加保扶、滅必蝨、達馬松、大利松、巴拉松、一品松、亞素靈等項之檢測結果皆小於偵測極限或定量極限。本年度水質抽驗合格率（合格率之統計係以檢驗分析數據與水質標準管制限值比較之結果判定，未剔除陳述意見或訴願後撤銷之案件），以檢測點而言，除彰化縣TTW-I10（員林第二淨水場）及高雄市TTW-O21（路竹淨水場）測點之水質合格率（合格項數/監測項數）分別為96.4%(27/28)及97.1%(33/34)外，其餘各檢測點之水質合格率皆為100.0%；而就測項而言，除鉛及鹵乙酸類HAA5之檢測點合格率分別為99.8%(399/400)及99.1%(109/110)外，其餘各檢測點之檢測項目合格率皆為100.0%。針對非列管項目，除甲醛、二氯乙腈、二溴乙腈、水合氯醛、糞便性大腸桿菌群、大腸桿菌等測項外，其餘測項之檢測結果均小於偵測極限或定量極限值。　　針對103年度及104年4～8月超標或臨標測點、鋁測值超過0.2 mg/L、各相關檢驗項目中檢驗數據較歷年偏高之淨水場測點，於104年9～10月進行複測追蹤。由監測結果發現臺中市TTW-G02（豐原第二淨水場）鋁測項、臺東縣TTW-T30（綠島淨水場）之總三鹵甲烷，以及苗栗縣TTW-F09（明德淨水場）之鹵乙酸類仍有超過 0.7 倍管制標準，其餘測點均有明顯改善且均已符合飲用水水質標準；而高雄市路竹淨水場之鹵乙酸類則於本階段超過飲用水水質標準。

中文關鍵字

飲用水水質標準、總三鹵甲烷、重金屬

類型	檔名	檔案大小	說明	最新版公開日期
期末報告	104年度飲用水水質標準中較難檢驗項目抽驗計畫(公開版).pdf	0MB		2016/2/1 上午 12:00:00

摘要	The purpose of this project was to examine the water quality of the pre-chosen 362 drinking water systems and 38 simple tap-water systems of the 22 municipal counties or cities. There were 71 analytes for drinking water systems, with 47 of them regulated and the remaining 24 non-regulated. 　　The regulated analytes included 13 metals (arsenic, lead, selenium, chromium, cadmium, barium, antimony, nickel, mercury, silver, indium, molybdenum and aluminum), 1 health affecting substance (cyanide), 4 disinfection byproducts (total trihalomethanes (TTHMs), bromate, chlorite and haloacetic acids (HAA5) ), 15 volatile organics (trichoroethylene, carbon tetrachloride, 1,1,1-trichloroethane, 1,2-dichloroethane, vinyl chloride, benzene, 1,4-dichlorobenzene, 1,1-dichloroethene, dichloromethane, 1,2-dichlorobenzene, xylenes, cis- and trans- 1,2-dichloroethene, tetrachloroethene and toluene), 13 pesticides (endosulfan, lindane, butachlor, 2,4-D, paraquat, methomyl, carbofuran, Isoprocarb, methamidophos, diazinon, parathion, EPN, and monocrotophos) and 1 persistent volatile organic compound (dioxins), which accounted for a total of 47 analytes. 　　The non-regulated analytes included 3 metals (hexavalent chromium, gallium, thallium), 3 disinfection byproducts (dichloroacetonitrile, dibromoacetonitrile and chloral hydrate), 7 volatile organics (1,1-dichloroethane, 1,2-dichloro propane, styrene, chlorobenzene, ethylbenzene, formaldehyde and MTBE), 8 endocrine disrupting chemicals (nonyl phenols, bisphenol A, dimethyl phthalate (DMP), diethyl phthalate (DEP), di-n-butyl phthalate (DBP), nenzyl butyl phthalate (BBP), di-n-octyl phthalate (DNOP), bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) ), 2 microorganisms (fecal coliforms, E. coli) and 1 biological metabolite (microcystin-LR), which accounted for a total of 24 analytes. 　　The total test counts of the regulated analytes and non-regulated analytes for tap-water systems were 6,025 and 1,350, and the total test counts of the regulated and non-regulated analytes for simple tapwater systems were 513 and 81, respectively. The 2015 analytical results indicated that silver, mercury, indium, cyanide, bromate, chlorite, trichoroethylene, carbon tetrachloride, 1,1,1-trichloroethane, 1,2-dichloroethane, vinyl chloride, benzene, 1,4-dichlorobenzene, 1,1-dichloroethene, dichloromethane, 1,2-dichlorobenzene, xylenes, cis- and trans- 1,2-dichloroethene, tetrachloroethene and toluene, endosulfan, lindane, butachlor, 2,4-D, paraquat, methomyl, carbofuran, Isoprocarb, methamidophos, diazinon, parathion, EPN, and monocrotophos in drinking water supply systems were not detected or less than the quantitation detection limits of the respective analytical methods. Water examined for all tested locations met the required drinking water criteria except sample TTW-I10 in Chang-hua County (Yuan-lin second water treatment plant) and TTW-O21 in Kaohsiung City (Lu-jhu water treatment plant), which had a passing rate of 96.4% and 97.1%. (The proportion of analyses passing the drinking water regulatory limits was calculated by dividing the number of analyses in compliance with the limits by the total number of analyses. Cases absolved by statement or appeal were not excluded from the calculation.) All analytes tested met the required drinking water criteria except lead and HAA5, which had a passing rate of 99.8% and 99.1%. All other non-regulated analytes were less than the method detection limits or quantitation detection limits except formaldehyde, dichloroacetonitrile, dibromoacetonitrile, chloral hydrate, fecal coliforms and E. coli. 　　Test locations meeting any of the following criteria were selected for follow-up and re-tested in September to October: 1) analytes that exceeded or approached the drinking water regulatory limits during either 2014 or April to August this year, 2) aluminum concentrations exceeding 0.2 mg/L, or 3) results exceeding the historical maxima. The results indicated that the analytes re-tested met the drinking water quality standards except for aluminum of TTW-G02 in Taichung City (Feng-yuan second water treatment plant), TTHMs of TTW-T30 in Taitung County (Green Island water treatment plant), and HAA5 of TTW-F09 in Miaoli County (Ming-de water treatment plant), which still exceeded the alarm value (70% of the drinking water criteria). However, the test locations of Lu-jhu water treatment plant in Kaohsiung City still exceeded the drinking water regulatory limits for HAA5 at this stage.
英文關鍵字	Drinking Water Quality Standards, Total Trihalomethane, Heavy Metals

摘要

　　The purpose of this project was to examine the water quality of the pre-chosen 362 drinking water systems and 38 simple tap-water systems of the 22 municipal counties or cities. There were 71 analytes for drinking water systems, with 47 of them regulated and the remaining 24 non-regulated. 　　The regulated analytes included 13 metals (arsenic, lead, selenium, chromium, cadmium, barium, antimony, nickel, mercury, silver, indium, molybdenum and aluminum), 1 health affecting substance (cyanide), 4 disinfection byproducts (total trihalomethanes (TTHMs), bromate, chlorite and haloacetic acids (HAA5) ), 15 volatile organics (trichoroethylene, carbon tetrachloride, 1,1,1-trichloroethane, 1,2-dichloroethane, vinyl chloride, benzene, 1,4-dichlorobenzene, 1,1-dichloroethene, dichloromethane, 1,2-dichlorobenzene, xylenes, cis- and trans- 1,2-dichloroethene, tetrachloroethene and toluene), 13 pesticides (endosulfan, lindane, butachlor, 2,4-D, paraquat, methomyl, carbofuran, Isoprocarb, methamidophos, diazinon, parathion, EPN, and monocrotophos) and 1 persistent volatile organic compound (dioxins), which accounted for a total of 47 analytes. 　　The non-regulated analytes included 3 metals (hexavalent chromium, gallium, thallium), 3 disinfection byproducts (dichloroacetonitrile, dibromoacetonitrile and chloral hydrate), 7 volatile organics (1,1-dichloroethane, 1,2-dichloro propane, styrene, chlorobenzene, ethylbenzene, formaldehyde and MTBE), 8 endocrine disrupting chemicals (nonyl phenols, bisphenol A, dimethyl phthalate (DMP), diethyl phthalate (DEP), di-n-butyl phthalate (DBP), nenzyl butyl phthalate (BBP), di-n-octyl phthalate (DNOP), bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) ), 2 microorganisms (fecal coliforms, E. coli) and 1 biological metabolite (microcystin-LR), which accounted for a total of 24 analytes. 　　The total test counts of the regulated analytes and non-regulated analytes for tap-water systems were 6,025 and 1,350, and the total test counts of the regulated and non-regulated analytes for simple tapwater systems were 513 and 81, respectively. The 2015 analytical results indicated that silver, mercury, indium, cyanide, bromate, chlorite, trichoroethylene, carbon tetrachloride, 1,1,1-trichloroethane, 1,2-dichloroethane, vinyl chloride, benzene, 1,4-dichlorobenzene, 1,1-dichloroethene, dichloromethane, 1,2-dichlorobenzene, xylenes, cis- and trans- 1,2-dichloroethene, tetrachloroethene and toluene, endosulfan, lindane, butachlor, 2,4-D, paraquat, methomyl, carbofuran, Isoprocarb, methamidophos, diazinon, parathion, EPN, and monocrotophos in drinking water supply systems were not detected or less than the quantitation detection limits of the respective analytical methods. Water examined for all tested locations met the required drinking water criteria except sample TTW-I10 in Chang-hua County (Yuan-lin second water treatment plant) and TTW-O21 in Kaohsiung City (Lu-jhu water treatment plant), which had a passing rate of 96.4% and 97.1%. (The proportion of analyses passing the drinking water regulatory limits was calculated by dividing the number of analyses in compliance with the limits by the total number of analyses. Cases absolved by statement or appeal were not excluded from the calculation.) All analytes tested met the required drinking water criteria except lead and HAA5, which had a passing rate of 99.8% and 99.1%. All other non-regulated analytes were less than the method detection limits or quantitation detection limits except formaldehyde, dichloroacetonitrile, dibromoacetonitrile, chloral hydrate, fecal coliforms and E. coli. 　　Test locations meeting any of the following criteria were selected for follow-up and re-tested in September to October: 1) analytes that exceeded or approached the drinking water regulatory limits during either 2014 or April to August this year, 2) aluminum concentrations exceeding 0.2 mg/L, or 3) results exceeding the historical maxima. The results indicated that the analytes re-tested met the drinking water quality standards except for aluminum of TTW-G02 in Taichung City (Feng-yuan second water treatment plant), TTHMs of TTW-T30 in Taitung County (Green Island water treatment plant), and HAA5 of TTW-F09 in Miaoli County (Ming-de water treatment plant), which still exceeded the alarm value (70% of the drinking water criteria). However, the test locations of Lu-jhu water treatment plant in Kaohsiung City still exceeded the drinking water regulatory limits for HAA5 at this stage.

英文關鍵字

Drinking Water Quality Standards, Total Trihalomethane, Heavy Metals