環保專案成果報告查詢系統

專案計畫編號	EPA-105-K103-02-D015
經費年度	105
計畫經費	2,230 千元
專案開始日期	2016/03/04
專案結束日期	2016/12/31
專案主持人	胡思聰
主辦單位	管考處
承辦人	陳建中
執行單位	台灣省環境工程技師公會
專案分類	水質保護、大氣空氣、土壤及地下水
中文關鍵字	簽證，登記，管理系統
英文關鍵字	certification, registered, management information system
協同主持人	黃福全
共同主持人
計畫聯絡人	陳巧玲
計畫聯絡電話	02-25550353#
計畫聯絡信箱	tpeea.win@msa.hinet.net

中文摘要	行政院環境保護署辦理環工技師簽證案件查核，其目的在於了解簽證技師之簽證品質及缺失情形，進而督促簽證技師改進，以提升環工技師簽證品質，另自95 年度起開始執行技師執業機構查核，查核重點為工作底稿。本年度（105）執業機構查核最常出現之缺失為「未留存簽證案件之演算及計算部分有關文件」占33%，其次為「未註明工作底稿間相互引用之主要事實或數字頁次」及「查核結果與簽證內容不合理或不一致」各占15%。水污染現場查核最常出現之缺失為「簽證文件之說明文字及數值填錯或不一致」占24%，其次為「質量平衡計算不合理」占11%，再其次為「功能測試報告操作日報表缺漏」占10%。固定污染源查核最常出現缺失為「簽證文件之說明文字及數值填錯或不一致」占21%，其次為「污染防治設施各處理單元設計參數及操作參數不合理」占19%，再其次為「原、物料或燃料使用(含生煤使用)種類及數量未列出或與申請文件不符」占11%。土壤及地下水污染整治簽證案件現場查核最常出現之缺失為查核缺失為「採樣佈點數量、位置或深度不合理」占19%、「事業基本資料(地址、行業別、聯絡人等)不符合」占14%、「樣品分析方式不合理」占10%。水污染現場查核與固定污染源查核列為有簽證缺失之技師計15 名，其中第二級缺失技師共2 名為李俊坤和萬江龍，第三級缺失共2 名為褚靜茹和魯苾賢，第三級缺失技師將送懲戒。此外，為了有效管制技師簽證業務，本計畫同時進行環工技師基本管理系統之規劃與建置工作，藉由網路管理系統提供各級環保主管機關了解技師基本資料、簽證狀況、接受查核結果及獎懲等紀錄，以落實技師簽證管考。並持續配合環保署業務單位及縣市政府環境保護局推動以網路傳輸方式辦理環保許可文件之申請制度，強化環工技師管理系統簽證紀錄提報及相關介接功能。本計畫另一工作項目則持續協助環保署環境工程技師相關法規研析及資料撰寫，包括修正與技師法相關之法規、評析環境工程技師、環境工程業及環境類工程技術顧問公司之法制及因應立法院與環境工程業或環工技師相關議案，研提對案資料。
中文關鍵字	簽證，登記，管理系統

中文摘要

行政院環境保護署辦理環工技師簽證案件查核，其目的在於了解簽證技師之簽證品質及缺失情形，進而督促簽證技師改進，以提升環工技師簽證品質，另自95 年度起開始執行技師執業機構查核，查核重點為工作底稿。本年度（105）執業機構查核最常出現之缺失為「未留存簽證案件之演算及計算部分有關文件」占33%，其次為「未註明工作底稿間相互引用之主要事實或數字頁次」及「查核結果與簽證內容不合理或不一致」各占15%。水污染現場查核最常出現之缺失為「簽證文件之說明文字及數值填錯或不一致」占24%，其次為「質量平衡計算不合理」占11%，再其次為「功能測試報告操作日報表缺漏」占10%。固定污染源查核最常出現缺失為「簽證文件之說明文字及數值填錯或不一致」占21%，其次為「污染防治設施各處理單元設計參數及操作參數不合理」占19%，再其次為「原、物料或燃料使用(含生煤使用)種類及數量未列出或與申請文件不符」占11%。土壤及地下水污染整治簽證案件現場查核最常出現之缺失為查核缺失為「採樣佈點數量、位置或深度不合理」占19%、「事業基本資料(地址、行業別、聯絡人等)不符合」占14%、「樣品分析方式不合理」占10%。水污染現場查核與固定污染源查核列為有簽證缺失之技師計15 名，其中第二級缺失技師共2 名為李俊坤和萬江龍，第三級缺失共2 名為褚靜茹和魯苾賢，第三級缺失技師將送懲戒。此外，為了有效管制技師簽證業務，本計畫同時進行環工技師基本管理系統之規劃與建置工作，藉由網路管理系統提供各級環保主管機關了解技師基本資料、簽證狀況、接受查核結果及獎懲等紀錄，以落實技師簽證管考。並持續配合環保署業務單位及縣市政府環境保護局推動以網路傳輸方式辦理環保許可文件之申請制度，強化環工技師管理系統簽證紀錄提報及相關介接功能。本計畫另一工作項目則持續協助環保署環境工程技師相關法規研析及資料撰寫，包括修正與技師法相關之法規、評析環境工程技師、環境工程業及環境類工程技術顧問公司之法制及因應立法院與環境工程業或環工技師相關議案，研提對案資料。

中文關鍵字

簽證，登記，管理系統

類型	檔名	檔案大小	說明	最新版公開日期
期末報告	EPA105K10302D015.pdf	25MB		2017/2/1 上午 12:00:00

摘要	The objectives of the EPA’s (Environmental Protection Administration) registered professional environmental engineer certification cases review inspection plan were for the purpose of examine the quality and defects of certification cases processed by those certified engineers. The results can be used guide the environmental engineers processing the certification and enhance the quality of the report. The operations of registered professional engineering consulting firm/ office have been reviewed since 2006. The key points were focused on inspection of worksheets. This year (2016), the review of the operation of registered professional engineering organizations found that the most frequent defects were “Relevant calculations are not saved for certificate cases”, around 33%. The next defects were “work drafts did not clearly specify the origin of each fact or the sources and date of data”, and "the results of review were not reasonable or not consistent with the contents of the document”, around 15% each. For the review of water pollution sites, the most frequent defects were "in the application documents, texts and values were not filled in, incorrect or inconsistent", around 24%, followed by "unreasonable treatment unit design parameters and operational parameters", around 11%. Next defects were “operation conditions or control parameters were not consistent with application document”, and "the contaminants in the raw materials were not listed in wastewater water quality items”, 10% each. The most frequent defects appeared on stationary source review were "in the application documents, texts and values were not filled in, incorrect or inconsistent", around 21%. followed by “for pollution control facilities, processing unit design parameters and operation parameters were not reasonable”, around 19%. And next defect was “calculation errors for air pollutant emissions, such used wrong equations and the height of discharge pipe outlets not calculated in accordance to height above ground”, around 11%. For soil and underground water pollution remediation cases on site review, the most frequently appearing defects were “in the application documents, texts and values were not filled in, incorrect or inconsistent”, “site current and usage histories were not described”, “start layout sampling points and sampling before studying of prior site use conditions”, “without business owner’s pollution potential areas”, and “no pollutant data and process pollution control information”, etc. five items. In addition, to effectively manage the professional engineer certification process, this program established the Registered Professional Environmental Engineer management information system. Through an Internet management system, information was provided to every level of environmental control management organizations to make available basic information on professional engineers, including their certification status, review results, and award and punishment received, to improve the management of professional engineer certifications. And, continuously coordinating with EPA and regional EPB to promote the use of internet to carry out permit application system, to strengthen registered environmental engineer certification record submission and relevant interface functions. Another objective of this program is to continuously assist EPA to study and develop information for registered professional environmental engineer regulations, including amend regulations related to professional engineer, evaluate registered environmental engineers, environmental engineering industry and environmental consultant company related regulations. And study and propose responses to relevant proposals of Legislative Yuan and environmental industries or registered environment engineers.
英文關鍵字	certification, registered, management information system

摘要

The objectives of the EPA’s (Environmental Protection Administration) registered professional environmental engineer certification cases review inspection plan were for the purpose of examine the quality and defects of certification cases processed by those certified engineers. The results can be used guide the environmental engineers processing the certification and enhance the quality of the report. The operations of registered professional engineering consulting firm/ office have been reviewed since 2006. The key points were focused on inspection of worksheets. This year (2016), the review of the operation of registered professional engineering organizations found that the most frequent defects were “Relevant calculations are not saved for certificate cases”, around 33%. The next defects were “work drafts did not clearly specify the origin of each fact or the sources and date of data”, and "the results of review were not reasonable or not consistent with the contents of the document”, around 15% each. For the review of water pollution sites, the most frequent defects were "in the application documents, texts and values were not filled in, incorrect or inconsistent", around 24%, followed by "unreasonable treatment unit design parameters and operational parameters", around 11%. Next defects were “operation conditions or control parameters were not consistent with application document”, and "the contaminants in the raw materials were not listed in wastewater water quality items”, 10% each. The most frequent defects appeared on stationary source review were "in the application documents, texts and values were not filled in, incorrect or inconsistent", around 21%. followed by “for pollution control facilities, processing unit design parameters and operation parameters were not reasonable”, around 19%. And next defect was “calculation errors for air pollutant emissions, such used wrong equations and the height of discharge pipe outlets not calculated in accordance to height above ground”, around 11%. For soil and underground water pollution remediation cases on site review, the most frequently appearing defects were “in the application documents, texts and values were not filled in, incorrect or inconsistent”, “site current and usage histories were not described”, “start layout sampling points and sampling before studying of prior site use conditions”, “without business owner’s pollution potential areas”, and “no pollutant data and process pollution control information”, etc. five items. In addition, to effectively manage the professional engineer certification process, this program established the Registered Professional Environmental Engineer management information system. Through an Internet management system, information was provided to every level of environmental control management organizations to make available basic information on professional engineers, including their certification status, review results, and award and punishment received, to improve the management of professional engineer certifications. And, continuously coordinating with EPA and regional EPB to promote the use of internet to carry out permit application system, to strengthen registered environmental engineer certification record submission and relevant interface functions. Another objective of this program is to continuously assist EPA to study and develop information for registered professional environmental engineer regulations, including amend regulations related to professional engineer, evaluate registered environmental engineers, environmental engineering industry and environmental consultant company related regulations. And study and propose responses to relevant proposals of Legislative Yuan and environmental industries or registered environment engineers.

英文關鍵字

certification, registered, management information system