EPA-106-K103-02-A157

106

384 千元

管制考核及糾紛處理-環工技師簽證案件查核管理與陳情管制

2017/03/27

2018/12/31

范綱智

管考處

陳建中

台灣省環境工程技師公會

水質保護、大氣空氣、土壤及地下水

簽證，登記，管理系統

certification, registered, management information system

黃福全

陳巧玲

02-25550353#

tpeea.win@msa.hinet.net

行政院環境保護署辦理環工技師簽證案件查核，其目的在於了解簽證技師之簽證品質及缺失情形，進而督促簽證技師改進，以提升環工技師簽證品質，另自95年度起開始執行技師執業機構查核，查核重點為工作底稿。 106年度水污染簽證案查核顯示最常出現缺失為：簽證文件說明文字及數值填錯或不一致、處理單元設計參數及操作參數不合理，以及操作參數及質量平衡計算不合。 固定污染源簽證案查核顯示最常出現缺失為：說明文字及數值填錯或不一致、產生逸散之原物料列入污染物排放量估算不合理，以及污染防制設施各處理單元設計參數及操作參數不合理。 土壤及地下水污染簽證案顯示最常出現缺失為；評估調查之流程或方式不合理、採樣使用機具、設備或方式不合理，以及產生污染物或污染源評估不合理。 執業機構查核結果顯示，主要缺失以簽證案件查核方法與流程不合理、工作底稿查核意見表示方式不合理、無工作底稿首頁，以及現場查核照片未留存。 已完成之查核案件缺失統計為：水污染簽證案第三級缺失1件，固定污染源簽證案第三級缺失1件。 107年度水污染簽證案查核顯示最常出現缺失為：簽證文件說明文字及數值填錯或不一致、處理單元設計參數及操作參數不合理、質量平衡計算錯誤或不合理、事業基本資料(大門座標、放流口座標、聯絡人及專責人員等)與現場不符或於文件中不一致、操作維護費(電費或藥品費)估算不合理、流量計測設施與申請文件不符或流量計紀錄值與申請文件不符或放流口位置未依規定設置。 固定污染源簽證案查核顯示最常出現缺失為：說明文件中文字及數值未填，填錯或前後不一致(每1項每1個單元應分別計)、相關圖說未標示製程之設備(E)、空氣污染防制設施(A)、粉粒狀物料輸送設施接駁點(C)、堆置場(X)、儲槽(T)及排放口(P)---(應分項計)、原、物料或燃料使用(含生煤使用)種類及數量未列出或與申請文件不符、污染防制設施各處理單元設計參數及操作參數不合理、申請文件中產生逸散之原物料未列入污染物排放量估算或估算錯誤、空氣污染物排放量計算錯誤，如公式引用錯誤及排放管道出口高度未以地面高程計算等、平面配置圖(大門、廠房、處理設施或排放口位置等)錯誤或與申請文件不符。 土壤及地下水污染簽證案顯示最常出現缺失為：採樣佈點位置或點數或採樣深度不合理或經審查後補採樣、評估規劃不合理或或污染潛勢判定不合理或低估評估事業用地範圍、事業污染源配置、用地範圍、佈點位置、採樣深度或運作情形（含歷史運作情形）等與申請文件不一致或調查內容不完備、工作底稿查核方法、經過或意見不合理。 已完成之查核案件缺失統計為：水污染簽證案第三級缺失1件，土壤及地下水污染簽證案第三級缺失2件。 此外，為了有效管制技師簽證業務，本計畫同時進行環工技師基本管理系統之規劃與建置工作，藉由網路管理系統提供各級環保主管機關了解技師基本資料、簽證狀況、接受查核結果及獎懲等紀錄，以落實技師簽證管考。並持續配合環保署業務單位及縣市政府環境保護局推動以網路傳輸方式辦理環保許可文件之申請制度，強化環工技師管理系統簽證紀錄提報及相關介接功能。 本計畫另一工作項目則持續協助環保署環境工程技師相關法規研析及資料撰寫，包括修正與技師法相關之法規、評析環境工程技師、環境工程業及環境類工程技術顧問公司之法制及因應立法院與環境工程業或環工技師相關議案，研提對案資料。

簽證，登記，管理系統

成果報告及附件.pdf

72MB

2019/2/1 上午 12:00:00

The objectives of the EPA’s (Environmental Protection Administration) registered professional environmental engineer certification cases review inspection plan were for the purpose of examine the quality and defects of certification cases processed by those certified engineers. The results can be used guide the environmental engineers processing the certification and enhance the quality of the report. The operations of registered professional engineering consulting firm/ office have been reviewed since 2006. The operations are focused on inspection of worksheets. The most common errors occur in the 2017 annual water pollution review are: the text and numerical values in the certification documents are filled in incorrectly or inconsistent, the treatment unit design parameters and operating parameters are unreasonable, and the operational parameters and mass balance calculations are not consistent. The review of the fixed pollution source certification cases shows that the most common errors are: the text and the numerical values are filled in incorrectly or inconsistent, the estimations of the pollutant discharge from the raw materials are unreasonable, and the design parameters and operating parameters of all treatment units for the pollution prevention and control facilities are unreasonable. Soil and under groundwater pollution certification cases show that the most common mistakes are: the process or method of assessing the investigation is unreasonable, the sampling machinery, equipment or methods are unreasonable, and the assessments of pollutants produced or pollution sources are unreasonable. The results of the review of the practice agencies showed that the main mistakes are: methods and procedures for checking the certification cases are unreasonable, the presentation of the opinions for the working papers are unreasonable, no the front page for the work papers, and the photos for the field inspections are not retained. The error statistics for the completed review cases are: one third level error for the water pollution certification cases, and one third level error for the fixed pollution source certification cases. The 2018 water pollution certification review check shows that the most common mistakes are: the certification document text and the numerical values are filled in wrong or inconsistence, processing unit design parameters and operating parameters are unreasonable, mass balance calculation error or unreasonable, basic business information (gate coordinates, the coordinates of the discharge points, the contact person and the designated responsible personnel, etc.) are inconsistent against the site or the document, the operation and maintenance costs (electricity fee or dosage costs) are unreasonably estimated, the flow measurement facilities do not conform to the application documents, or the flow meter records do not match the application documents or the position of the discharge points are not located as specified. The fixed pollution source certification check shows that the most common mistakes are: the text and numerical values in the explanatory documents are not filled, or filled in wrong or inconsistent (each item for each unit should be counted separately), the related drawings do not marked with processing equipment (E), air pollution prevention facilities (A), powder and granular material transfer facilities connection points (C), stacking yards (X), storage tanks (T) and discharge points (P)---(should be counted individually). The types and quantities of raw materials, fuels or fuels used (including raw coal use) are not listed or inconsistent with the application documents, the design parameters and operating parameters of the treatment units for the pollution prevention facilities are unreasonable, and in the application documents the fugitive emissions generated by the raw materials are not included in pollutant discharge estimation or estimations are not correct, incorrect calculations for the air pollutant emissions, such as wrong formula used, or discharge point heights not calculated from the ground level, plane layout drawings (gates, plants, treatment facilities, or outlet locations) are wrong or not match the application documents. The soil and under groundwater pollution certification review cases show that the most common mistakes are: sampling locations or number of points or sampling depth are not reasonable or additional sampling are taken after review, evaluation plans are not reasonable or pollution potential determinations are unreasonable or underestimate the areas for the operation sites, the site pollution sources layouts, the scope of land use, the location of the sampling points layouts, the depth of sampling or the operation conditions (including historical operation conditions) etc. are inconsistent against the application documents or the investigation contents are incomplete, and the methods, process or opinions for the reviewing the working paper are unreasonable. The mistakes for the completed statistics for the review cases are: one third level mistake in the water pollution review cases, and two third level mistakes in the soil and under groundwater pollution review cases. In addition, to effectively manage the professional engineer certification process, this program established the Registered Professional Environmental Engineer management information system. Through an Internet management system, information was provided to every level of environmental control management organizations to make available basic information on professional engineers, including their certification status, review results, and award and punishment received, to improve the management of professional engineer certifications. And, continuously coordinating with EPA and regional EPB to promote the use of internet to carry out permit application system, to strengthen registered environmental engineer certification record submission and relevant interface functions. Another objective of this program is to continuously assist EPA to study and develop information for registered professional environmental engineer regulations, including amend regulations related to professional engineer, evaluate registered environmental engineers, environmental engineering industry and environmental consultant company related regulations. And study and propose responses to relevant proposals of Legislative Yuan and environmental industries or registered environment engineers.

certification, registered, management information system