YLEPB-106-016

106

9,750 千元

2017/05/05

2018/05/04

林清標

雲林縣環境保護局

曾建閔

台灣曼寧工程顧問股份有限公司

大氣空氣

固定污染源、廢氣燃燒塔、設備元件

fixed roof tank、flare、Component

劉昇諺

04-23293771#

q130112@gmail.com

本計畫主要的工作項目為專案列管本縣離島工業區揮發性有 機物污染源管制業務。確實監督離島工業區揮發性有機物污染源之 污染排放，並進行揮發性有機物污染源查核、檢測作業與後續追蹤 管制作業，提昇離島工業區VOCs 查核管制及排放減量成效，以維 護本縣空氣品質並減少對於民眾健康的衝擊。 本計畫均依合約規定執行完成所有工作量，其主要成果摘要如 下: (一) 配合輔導回收減量，106 年度使用事件日為121 天，各工廠均已 減少廢氣燃燒塔之使用事件日，且無工廠使用事件日達30 日者。 (二) 查核南亞海豐總廠(異壬醇廠)管道AA01、AA02 及長春石化廠管 道A001， 發現Flare 母火發生熄滅， 已提報環保局處份。 (三) VOC 製程查核發現台化海豐廠(合成酚廠)M02 製程防制設備其 他洗滌吸收塔(AB02、AB03) 廢氣處理量均低於許可核定正常操 作範圍； 南亞海豐廠(MA 廠)M06 製程洗滌塔(AF04)之廢氣處理 量、SCR(AF02)氨氣入料量亦均有低於許可核定正常操作範圍之 情形， 均應要求業者重新修正許可證污染源設備操作範圍。 (四) 內浮頂儲槽法規符合度查核，發現塑化麥三廠(OL-3)列管內浮頂 儲槽(T206、T208)於106 年度第四季檢測日期為106 年10 月3 日， 執行儲槽檢查通報日期為106 年9 月26 日， 經確認該廠未 依規定於執行儲槽檢查30 日前通知地方主管機關， 已提報環保 局處份。 (五) 外浮頂儲槽法規符合度查核及紅外線洩漏檢測作業， 發現塑化 麥一輕油廠TRJ1 儲槽， 量測結果為50,123.96 ppm； TR16 儲槽 量測結果為8,797.63ppm， 已提報環保局處份。 (六) 儲槽清槽報告書審查及開槽現場查核作業， 台化麥寮廠(SM1,2 廠)TL10 儲槽氣體削減作業報告書，未依規定於作業結束十五日 內提報地方主管機關， 已提報環保局處份。 (七) 掛牌複測元件修護時間查核， 塑化麥一廠輕油廠(M15)製程， 發 現2 個元件105Q3 季管制申報未於發現日15 日內修復完成且未 於20 日內提送展延修護資料， 已提報環保局告發。 (八) 設備元件GasFindIR 篩檢， 發現台塑麥寮廠氯乙烯廠(M11)取樣 點上方管線1 處洩漏源(>10,000ppm)， 已提報環保局告發。 (九) 裝載操作設施查核， 經彙整比對季申報表及總量申報表兩項申 報資料， 其裝載操作設施的年操作量、操作物料、裝載操作方 式等， 比對結果均正確。 (十) 廢水設施氣密量測作業， 塑化麥三廠(OL3 廠)油水分離池編號 I202 抽測結果未保持氣密，現場測得最高淨檢值1,338.5 ppm(大 於1000 ppm)， 已依抽測結果於查核當日進行告發。 (十一) 自105 年第三季起「空污費申報系統」與「固定污染源排放 量申報系統」已合併為「固定污染源空污費暨排放量申報整合 管理系統」， 故106 年起排放量均已統一而不致有不一致之情 形。 (十二) 統計104~106 年離島工業區油漆塗佈申報空污費之VOCs 排 放量約250~300 噸，僅次於設備元件、管道及儲槽，為離島工業 區第四大VOCs 污染源。其中塑化麥一廠油漆塗佈排放量佔整體 離島工業區油漆塗佈總排放量約35%為最高， 其次台塑麥寮廠 及麥寮汽電廠近三年也有約10~15%之貢獻量。

固定污染源、廢氣燃燒塔、設備元件

106年度雲林縣離島工業區揮發性有機物查核計畫期末報告.pdf

13MB

2019/2/1 上午 12:00:00

The major work item of the plan is the project control of volatile organic compounds in the islands district industrial zone of this County. It is needed to supervise the pollutant emissions of volatile organic compounds in the islands district industrial zone, conduct VOC sources of pollution inspections, examinations and follow-up control operations to enhance VOCs checks and the effectiveness in reducing emissions in the islands district industrial zone of this County, thereby maintaining this County’s air quality and reducing the impact on public health. The total amount of work provided herein was completed in accordance with the provisions of the contract. The main results are summarized as follows: (1) To keep up with reduction in recycling, the number of day use was 121 in 2017. Each factory had reduced the number of day use in the exhaust gas flaring tower, and no factory reached 30 days. (2) Checking the pipelines AA01 and AA02 of Nan Ya Haifeng General Plant (Isononyl alcohol) and A001 of Chang Chun Petrochemical Plant, we found that the head fire was extinguished and reported it to the Environmental Protection Bureau for disposition accordingly. (3) It was found in the VOC process check that the exhaust gas treatment capacity of the other scrubbing and absorption towers (AB02, AB03) of the M02 process control equipment at Haifeng Plant (Synthetic Phenol) of Formosa Chemicals ＆ Fiber Corporation was lower than the approved operating range; the exhaust gas treatment capacity of the Nanya Haifeng Plant (MA)M06 process scrubber (AF04) and some phenomena that the ammonia gas charging rates of SCR (AF02) were lower than those permitted by the approved operating range occurred as well. All operators should be demanded to revise the operating range of pollution source equipment in the license. (4) As to the check of the conformity of the internal floating roof tanks, it was found and confirmed that the internal floating roof tank (T206, T208) controlled in the Mailiao Plant 3 (OL-3) of Formosa Petrochemical Corporation had not notified the local competent authority 30 days before the implementation of the tank inspection, and has been submitted to the Environmental Protection Bureau for disposition, of which the detected date in the fourth quarter of 2017 was October 3, 2017. The implementation reported date of the storage tank inspection was September 26, 2017. (5) For the check of the compliance of the external floating roof tank regulations and infrared leak detection, the TRJ1 storage tank in the Naphtha Cracking Mailiao Plant 1 of Formosa Petrochemical Corporation was found to have a measurement result of 50,123.96 ppm; the TR16 storage tank’s measurement result was 8,797.63 ppm, which was submitted to the Environmental Protection Bureau for disposition. (6) In respect of the review of tank clearance report and verification at the trenching site, the reports on the gas reduction operation of the TL10 storage tanks in the Mailiao Plant of Formosa Chemicals ＆ Fiber Corporation (SM1, 2) were not reported to the local supervisors within 15 days after completion of the operation. The agency has submitted the report to the Environmental Protection Bureau. (7) It was found when checking the component repair time of the official retest that, in the manufacturing process at Naphtha Cracking Mailiao Plant 1 of Formosa Petrochemical Corporation (M15), 2 quarterly control components were not repaired within 15 days after the discovery nor were the repair data submitted for extension within 20 days, in the third quarter 2016. It has been reported to the Environmental Protection Bureau. (8) In the GasFindIR screening of equipment components, we found the leakage source (>10,000ppm) at Line 1 above the sampling point in the Mailiao Vinyl Chloride Plant (M11) of Formosa Plastic Group, and it was then reported to the Environmental Protection Bureau as well. (9) After integration and comparison of quarterly report form and aggregate report form in the inspection of loading and operating facilities, it showed that the annual operation amount, operation materials, and loading operation modes of the loading operation facilities were correct. (10) For measuring air-tightness of waste water facilities, the oil-water separator No.I202 in Mailiao Plant 3 of Formosa Petrochemical Corporation (OL3) was found to have not maintained an airtight seal after the sample test. The maximum net test value 1,338.5 ppm (greater than 1000 ppm) was measured out in the field. The result was reported accordingly on the same day. (11) Since the third quarter of 2016, the “Air Pollution Fee Reporting System” and “Fixed Pollution Sources Discharge Reporting System” have been merged into “Integrated Management System for Fixed Pollution Source Air Pollution Fee and Emission Reports”. The amount of emissions has been unified without any inconsistency since 2017. (12) The VOCs emission was computed as 250-300 tons based on the report of air pollution fees for paint coating in the islands district industrial zone between2015 and 2017, next only to equipment components, pipelines and storage tanks. It is the fourth largest source of VOCs pollution in the islands district industrial zone. Among them, the paint coating emission from the Mailiao Plant 1 of Formosa Petrochemical Corporation accounted for about 35% of the total paint and coating emissions of the entire island industrial zone, which ranked first, followed by Mailiao Plant and Mailiao Cogeneration Plant of Formosa Plastic Group which have contributed 10~15% approximately in the past three years.

fixed roof tank、flare、Component