EPA-106-FA18-03-D077

106

8,235 千元

空氣品質管理

2017/08/25

2018/08/24

張艮輝

空保處

梁喬凱

國立雲林科技大學

大氣空氣

容許增量限值、模式模擬規範、策略評估、長程傳輸

allowable increment limit, model simulation standard, strategy assessment, long-range transport

張能復；陳王琨；莊秉潔；林文印；林清和；賴信志；陳律言；陳錦煌；劉遵賢

蕭錦齡

05-5342601#4417

genie@airlab.yuntech.edu.tw

台灣空氣污染問題，隨時空環境變異，其本質特性與以往益形不同。自空氣污染防制費基金運作以來，民國84年至今各項防制措施不斷推展，空氣品質也有大幅度的改善。然而從長期濃度變化趨勢來看，仍有部分地區屬於懸浮微粒（PM10）與臭氧（O3）三級防制區，空氣品質仍需持續改善或維護。另外，為了保護民眾健康，環保署於2012年公告細懸浮微粒(PM2.5)空氣品質標準，而此污染物經監測結果後，我國要達成此項標準仍有很大的努力空間。 據空氣污染防制法第六條第二項及第三項規定：二級及三級防制區內，新增或變更之固定污染源污染物排放量達一定規模者，其污染物排放量須經模式模擬證明不超過污染物容許增量限值；第八條第二項亦規定：符合空氣品質標準之總量管制區，新設或變更之固定污染源污染物排放量達一定規模者，須經模式模擬證明不超過該區之污染物容許增量限值等規定。為因應上述法規之推動，因而於民國92年12月制訂「空氣品質模式模擬規範」，以規範固定源之許可申請。此規範於民國104年8月再次修訂公告，並於民國105年1月生效。 空氣品質模式的發展與應用須包括不同專業領域的科技知識與資訊，且空氣品質模式牽涉空氣污染法規層次之應用時，如何選用適當的模式，並在其使用中標準化其模擬過程，應有一定的規範予以界定，才能以昭公信。然而空氣品質模式相關資料分散在各學術與技術顧問機構中，常造成資源分散、重複建置、品質不一及資訊屏障等缺點。因此成立模式支援中心，以整合空氣品質模式相關資源，長期穩定提供模式模擬規範所需相關資料，有實務上的需求性與必要性。空保處在推動空氣污染防制法裡面「容許增量限值」的管制工作，以及環境影響評估相關的空氣品質模式法制化標準化之需求，於民國91年支援「空氣品質模式支援中心」的成立，以整合產官學相關的人力與數據資源。經過多年的努力，模式支援中心已累積相當的經驗與成果，對空氣品質保護決策支援有實質的幫助，然而對整個空氣品質保護工作而言，過去多項與容許增量限值及空氣品質模式模擬規範相關工作仍須繼續推動執行，並且因應細懸浮微粒(PM2.5)與臭氧(O3)污染改善策略之研擬與評估，境外長程傳輸對台灣影響動態變化之掌握，以及即時性案例空氣品質影響之模擬評估等，未來仍有許多工作需要推動並執行，故有本計畫的構想與需求。

容許增量限值、模式模擬規範、策略評估、長程傳輸

期末報告定稿.pdf

72MB

期末報告定稿

2018/12/1 上午 12:00:00

As the environment changed with time, the essential characteristics of air pollution in Taiwan are different from those in the past. Since the operation of the Air Pollution Prevention Fund in 1995, there have been great improvement in air quality. From the variabilities of the monitored data, however, the preservation and the improvement of the air quality in some areas, where the classifications belong to non-attainment areas of fine particulate matter and ozone, are still necessary. Besides, there is a lot of effort need to be made to match the air quality standard of PM2.5 announced by the EPA in 2012. According to the Paragraphs 2 and 3 of Article 6 in Air Pollution Control Act, those new or modified stationary pollution sources within Class 2 and Class 3 of air pollution classification, where air pollutant emissions reach a certain regulatory scale, are required to perform air quality modeling by suitable air quality model and demonstrate the results will not exceed the allowable increment limits. As the Paragraph 2 of Article 8 in Air Pollution Control Act stands, within a total-control-system district that meets air quality standards, those new or modified stationary pollution sources which emissions reach a certain regulatory scale are required to perform air quality simulation by suitable air quality model and verify the compliance demonstration that the sources will not will not cause or contribute to the violation of allowable increments. Development and application of air quality models need to integrate the interdisciplinary science, knowledge and information. In addition, a standard operating procedures about the choice of air quality models and the performance of simulation processes should be legislated when the air quality modes are involved for the application of air pollution regulations. However, the information of air quality model is scattered among academic and technical advisory organizations, often resulting in shortcomings such as resource fragmentation, repeated construction and information barrier. Therefore, the establishment of an air quality model support center to integrate the relevant resources of the models and to provide relevant information for the model simulation specification, is demand and necessity in practice. In order to promote the allowable increments in the Air Pollution Control Act and the necessity for the standardization of the air quality model related to environmental impact assessment, the Air Quality Model Support Center was established to integrate human and data resources related to industry and government in 1991. After years of hard work, the Center has accumulated considerable experience and achievements, and has substantially offered contribution to the air quality protection polity decisions. For the entire air quality protection work, the multiple works related to allowable increments and air quality mode simulation regulations must continue to be promoted. Moreover, in response to the research and evaluation of fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) and ozone (O3) pollution improvement strategies, the dynamic changes for the long-distance transportation of overseas influence on Taiwan, and the assessments of instantaneous air pollution episodes, there are still many tasks that need to be promoted and implemented in the future. Hence, it is crucial for the establishment and implementation of this project。

allowable increment limit, model simulation standard, strategy assessment, long-range transport