環保專案成果報告查詢系統

專案計畫編號	EPA-107-GA01-03-A197
經費年度	107
計畫經費	13,000 千元
預算科目	土壤及地下水污染整治策略規劃
專案開始日期	2018/07/25
專案結束日期	2019/10/24
專案主持人	陳玟潔
主辦單位	土污基管會
承辦人	孫冬京
執行單位	環興科技股份有限公司
專案分類	土壤及地下水
中文關鍵字	場址管理、停滯場址、場址關鍵績效控管機制
英文關鍵字	Site Management, Stagnant site, Key Performance Indicators
協同主持人	賴宜欣
共同主持人
計畫聯絡人	陳玟潔
計畫聯絡電話	02-27691366#
計畫聯絡信箱	janicechen@mail.sinotech.com.tw

中文摘要	(一) 研修場址管理方案為有效運用土污基金，本計畫彙整歷年公告列管場址資訊，藉此分析已解列場址污染改善經驗，作為未來相似場址整治之參考；另追蹤列管中場址污染改善進度及現況窒礙難行之處，以推動場址管理方案，避免停滯場址之產生。本計畫持續研修場址管理方案，依場址特性及現況評估結果，區分為優先整治評估規劃、土地活化或區域開發、依風險評估訂定整治目標、風險管理場址、長期監測式自然衰減、模場試驗場址、綠能補助場址及非法棄置場址等不同管制作為進行評分及名單排序，以利主管機關評估採取對應措施與決策上之參考，並於「土壤及地下水資訊管理系統」建置場址管理方案專屬頁面，提供各管制作為篩選條件及權重資訊。 (二) 場址先期改善評估與效益檢討為加速停滯場址啟動污染改善作業，且降低列管場址數，本計畫除場址改善進度外，亦針對96處停滯場址進行盤點作業，並依據場址樣態進行分類。依據停滯場址盤點結果，篩選58處停滯場址辦理現勘評估作業，除針對污染行為人改善作業之追蹤外，亦會同土地關係人，藉此輔導污染行為人不明場址，可協調土地關係人投入資源改善作業，經現勘輔導成果區分(1)有意願改善場址計17處，後續移交地方環保局持續追蹤輔導改善；(2)無意願改善場址41處，則協助研擬解列規劃書，作為推動停滯場址建議執行之管制作為，並篩選3處示範場址，優先辦理先期改善評估工作，據以研提後續場址改善建議及管制作為方向。另就本計畫場址盤點結果、現勘評估報告及補充調查作業成果，研提場址管理推行建議。 (三) 場址KPI控管機制整體分析及優化為有效掌握各縣市土壤及地下水污染場址之改善推動進度，本計畫於計畫執行期間，依現行土壤及地下水污染場址作業管理策略，強化場址KPI及系統控管機制，新增3項場址KPI系統控管功能，及增修優化20項場址KPI流程作業，並規劃與建置「列管場址整治進度展示功能」、「停滯場址與定期監測場址管理功能」以及規劃6項場址績效評核指標，另完成27次環保局場址登錄資料之異常分析評估作業。本計畫另設立場址KPI專線客服，即時解決環保機關場址相關問題，並於108年8月6日完成辦理一場次「108年度場址KPI流程控管系統教育訓練」，且於教育訓練後將縣市常見問題彙整於「場址KPI流程控管系統問答集」。
中文關鍵字	場址管理、停滯場址、場址關鍵績效控管機制

中文摘要

(一) 研修場址管理方案為有效運用土污基金，本計畫彙整歷年公告列管場址資訊，藉此分析已解列場址污染改善經驗，作為未來相似場址整治之參考；另追蹤列管中場址污染改善進度及現況窒礙難行之處，以推動場址管理方案，避免停滯場址之產生。本計畫持續研修場址管理方案，依場址特性及現況評估結果，區分為優先整治評估規劃、土地活化或區域開發、依風險評估訂定整治目標、風險管理場址、長期監測式自然衰減、模場試驗場址、綠能補助場址及非法棄置場址等不同管制作為進行評分及名單排序，以利主管機關評估採取對應措施與決策上之參考，並於「土壤及地下水資訊管理系統」建置場址管理方案專屬頁面，提供各管制作為篩選條件及權重資訊。 (二) 場址先期改善評估與效益檢討為加速停滯場址啟動污染改善作業，且降低列管場址數，本計畫除場址改善進度外，亦針對96處停滯場址進行盤點作業，並依據場址樣態進行分類。依據停滯場址盤點結果，篩選58處停滯場址辦理現勘評估作業，除針對污染行為人改善作業之追蹤外，亦會同土地關係人，藉此輔導污染行為人不明場址，可協調土地關係人投入資源改善作業，經現勘輔導成果區分(1)有意願改善場址計17處，後續移交地方環保局持續追蹤輔導改善；(2)無意願改善場址41處，則協助研擬解列規劃書，作為推動停滯場址建議執行之管制作為，並篩選3處示範場址，優先辦理先期改善評估工作，據以研提後續場址改善建議及管制作為方向。另就本計畫場址盤點結果、現勘評估報告及補充調查作業成果，研提場址管理推行建議。 (三) 場址KPI控管機制整體分析及優化為有效掌握各縣市土壤及地下水污染場址之改善推動進度，本計畫於計畫執行期間，依現行土壤及地下水污染場址作業管理策略，強化場址KPI及系統控管機制，新增3項場址KPI系統控管功能，及增修優化20項場址KPI流程作業，並規劃與建置「列管場址整治進度展示功能」、「停滯場址與定期監測場址管理功能」以及規劃6項場址績效評核指標，另完成27次環保局場址登錄資料之異常分析評估作業。本計畫另設立場址KPI專線客服，即時解決環保機關場址相關問題，並於108年8月6日完成辦理一場次「108年度場址KPI流程控管系統教育訓練」，且於教育訓練後將縣市常見問題彙整於「場址KPI流程控管系統問答集」。

中文關鍵字

場址管理、停滯場址、場址關鍵績效控管機制

類型	檔名	檔案大小	說明	最新版公開日期
期末報告	EPA107GA0103A197(全).pdf	18MB		2019/12/31 上午 12:00:00

摘要	1. Drafting Site Management Plan In order to effectively utilize the Soil Pollution Fund, this project has consolidated background information for all the contaminated sites that had been announced over the years. Then, this project uses this information to review the effectiveness of site improvement process and act as a reference for future remediation for sites with similar situation. Additionally, current contaminated site status and problem encountered has been continuously tracked in order to promote site management plan and to avoid the emergence of stagnant site. This project continues to review the Site Management Plan, and based on site characteristics and current site assessment results, the list of sites is then divided, scored and ranked respectively into prioritized remediation assessment and planning, land revitalization or regional development, remediation goals based on risk assessment, risk management sites, long-term monitored natural attenuation, pilot study sites, green energy subsidy sites and the illegal dump sites, so that the competent authority can evaluate the corresponding measures and decision-making. Also, a site-specific management page is built on the “Soil and Groundwater Information Management System” website in order to provide various management measures, such as screening criteria and weighted information. 2. Preliminary Site Assessment and Improvement Effectiveness Review In order to speed up pollution improvement for the stagnant sites and reduce the number of declared contaminated sites, this project performs an inventory count for 96 stagnant sites and classifies them according to each site status. In total, 58 stagnant sites are selected to conduct site survey and assessment work. In addition to tracking the site remediation progress, this project also works with the land stakeholders to help coordinating and gathering remediation resources for those sites whose potential polluters are uncertain. According to the site survey results, it can be categorized into: 1)17 sites that are willing to conduct remediation and subsequently transfer to the local EPB for continuous tracking and oversighting; 2)41 sites that have no intentions to conduct remediation but still assist in drafting the site de-listing plan for the promotion of proposed measures for the stagnation site. Additionally, 3 demonstrated sites are selected to perform preliminary site assessment and develop future site management and remediation strategies. Finally, site management recommendations are given to other sites based on site inventory analysis, site survey, assessment and additional investigation results. 3. Analysis and Optimization of Site KPI Management Framework In order to be effectively take control of the contaminated site remediation progress, this projects strengthen current site KPI management framework by adding 3 new site KPI management functions, optimizing 20 site KPI processes, designing to add "Declared Contaminated Site Remediation Progress Display Function", "Stagnant Site and Routine Monitoring Site Management Function", and 6 site performance assessment indicators. Additionally, 27 anomaly site data recorded by EPA are analyzed and evaluated. This project also sets up a site KPI customer service phone number to help environmental protection agency solving problems related to contaminated sites. On August 6, 2019, “2019 Annual Site KPI Process Management Training” was held and all the frequently asked questions are consolidated into "KPI Process Management System Q＆A".
英文關鍵字	Site Management, Stagnant site, Key Performance Indicators

摘要

1. Drafting Site Management Plan In order to effectively utilize the Soil Pollution Fund, this project has consolidated background information for all the contaminated sites that had been announced over the years. Then, this project uses this information to review the effectiveness of site improvement process and act as a reference for future remediation for sites with similar situation. Additionally, current contaminated site status and problem encountered has been continuously tracked in order to promote site management plan and to avoid the emergence of stagnant site. This project continues to review the Site Management Plan, and based on site characteristics and current site assessment results, the list of sites is then divided, scored and ranked respectively into prioritized remediation assessment and planning, land revitalization or regional development, remediation goals based on risk assessment, risk management sites, long-term monitored natural attenuation, pilot study sites, green energy subsidy sites and the illegal dump sites, so that the competent authority can evaluate the corresponding measures and decision-making. Also, a site-specific management page is built on the “Soil and Groundwater Information Management System” website in order to provide various management measures, such as screening criteria and weighted information. 2. Preliminary Site Assessment and Improvement Effectiveness Review In order to speed up pollution improvement for the stagnant sites and reduce the number of declared contaminated sites, this project performs an inventory count for 96 stagnant sites and classifies them according to each site status. In total, 58 stagnant sites are selected to conduct site survey and assessment work. In addition to tracking the site remediation progress, this project also works with the land stakeholders to help coordinating and gathering remediation resources for those sites whose potential polluters are uncertain. According to the site survey results, it can be categorized into: 1)17 sites that are willing to conduct remediation and subsequently transfer to the local EPB for continuous tracking and oversighting; 2)41 sites that have no intentions to conduct remediation but still assist in drafting the site de-listing plan for the promotion of proposed measures for the stagnation site. Additionally, 3 demonstrated sites are selected to perform preliminary site assessment and develop future site management and remediation strategies. Finally, site management recommendations are given to other sites based on site inventory analysis, site survey, assessment and additional investigation results. 3. Analysis and Optimization of Site KPI Management Framework In order to be effectively take control of the contaminated site remediation progress, this projects strengthen current site KPI management framework by adding 3 new site KPI management functions, optimizing 20 site KPI processes, designing to add "Declared Contaminated Site Remediation Progress Display Function", "Stagnant Site and Routine Monitoring Site Management Function", and 6 site performance assessment indicators. Additionally, 27 anomaly site data recorded by EPA are analyzed and evaluated. This project also sets up a site KPI customer service phone number to help environmental protection agency solving problems related to contaminated sites. On August 6, 2019, “2019 Annual Site KPI Process Management Training” was held and all the frequently asked questions are consolidated into "KPI Process Management System Q＆A".

英文關鍵字

Site Management, Stagnant site, Key Performance Indicators