環保專案成果報告查詢系統

專案計畫編號	EPA-107-GA01-03-A214
經費年度	107
計畫經費	5,640 千元
預算科目	土壤及地下水污染整治策略規劃
專案開始日期	2018/07/25
專案結束日期	2019/07/24
專案主持人	陳冠榮
主辦單位	土污基管會
承辦人	陳俞穎
執行單位	信諾科技有限公司
專案分類	土壤及地下水
中文關鍵字	土壤及地下水、整治費、基金管理
英文關鍵字	Soil and groundwater；Remediation Fees；Fund Management
協同主持人
共同主持人
計畫聯絡人	賴佩嵐
計畫聯絡電話	02-25521948#619
計畫聯絡信箱	ellen@utrust.com.tw

中文摘要	本計畫因應收費辦法修正，持續精進「土壤及地下水污染整治費網路申報及查詢系統」功能，新增非申報季補申報功能，系統設定並辨識申報季與非申報季區間，後臺增加設定經環保署認定可使用補申報專區之繳費廠商名單，以利即早完成補申報作業。建置免徵比率線上申辦功能，包含申辦審理歷程線上管理、佐證文件上傳及審查狀態快選分類功能，透過上傳功能取代大量紙本佐證文件需紙本郵寄問題，簡化審理單位審查作業流程，並節省紙張的印製與空間保存。優化海關進口資料補申報預填功能，系統自動比對同一統編之各公私場所繳費業者申報資料，採用不同顏色加以標記區分該筆明細是否有其他子廠已填寫申報，以避免重複申報，減少後續審理困擾及溢繳等情形發生。針對申報跨季補申報明細紀錄，系統增加自動拆分匯入應申報季別機制，簡化審查作業之拆季前置作業時間及提高效率。為推動整治費審查全面電子化線上作業，開發建置差異明細自動比對匯出、審理資料批次匯入、申報明細自動拆季等配套功能，俾利環保署即時掌握各審理歷程數據。推動保險及工程退費審查全面電子化線上作業，強化後臺審查功能，增加建置存查相關資料與審理過程記錄，並依照審核結果自動套印總審查表，業務單位亦可透過平臺即時掌握各案件進度、申請類別、核對金額等資訊。繳費人歷年申報資料，透過以產製及廢棄物之相關性來建立決策樹模型，分析其物質關聯性之特徵指標，依此勾稽繳費人申報資料，篩選出疑似應納入產製徵收列管的繳費人名單，提供審理單位做後續追蹤查核。研析環保署與原物料、製程、產品等相關之資料庫，可透過固定空氣污染源管理資訊系統、事業廢棄物申報及管理資訊系統資料，並加以對應產品原物料代碼與收費辦法附表一徵收物質代碼之相關性，建立數據介接機制，勾稽比對出疑似產製產品之名單，擴大掌握與整治費徵收及審理作業相關之各項業務資料。本期計畫持續強化預算經費管理系統，增加預算支用進度表審核控制功能，包含審核後之鎖定與解鎖功能，並記錄歷次更新時間，以確保數據時間及資料的一致性。透過與環保署的BAF系統資料介接即時取得及紀錄，每月節省管理人員至BAF查詢資料及校對的時間。強化各填報欄位檢核邏輯與增加主動稽核警示機制，以提升預算經費管理品質，協助相關業務單位有效掌握預算經費的支用進度。彙整相關計畫經費預算及支用情形，完成包含「委辦計畫發包作業列管表」、「補助計畫核定作業列管表」及「對外資料-基金來源、用途及餘絀表」等報表的查詢與匯出功能，自動彙整填報統計資料，同時提升資料正確性。另整合預算經費管控系統與土水整治費申報系統收入與支用之數據，進行交叉比對，提供相關業務單位掌握基金收支現狀或預測性指標，管理及追蹤基金長期執行情形。
中文關鍵字	土壤及地下水、整治費、基金管理

中文摘要

本計畫因應收費辦法修正，持續精進「土壤及地下水污染整治費網路申報及查詢系統」功能，新增非申報季補申報功能，系統設定並辨識申報季與非申報季區間，後臺增加設定經環保署認定可使用補申報專區之繳費廠商名單，以利即早完成補申報作業。建置免徵比率線上申辦功能，包含申辦審理歷程線上管理、佐證文件上傳及審查狀態快選分類功能，透過上傳功能取代大量紙本佐證文件需紙本郵寄問題，簡化審理單位審查作業流程，並節省紙張的印製與空間保存。優化海關進口資料補申報預填功能，系統自動比對同一統編之各公私場所繳費業者申報資料，採用不同顏色加以標記區分該筆明細是否有其他子廠已填寫申報，以避免重複申報，減少後續審理困擾及溢繳等情形發生。針對申報跨季補申報明細紀錄，系統增加自動拆分匯入應申報季別機制，簡化審查作業之拆季前置作業時間及提高效率。為推動整治費審查全面電子化線上作業，開發建置差異明細自動比對匯出、審理資料批次匯入、申報明細自動拆季等配套功能，俾利環保署即時掌握各審理歷程數據。推動保險及工程退費審查全面電子化線上作業，強化後臺審查功能，增加建置存查相關資料與審理過程記錄，並依照審核結果自動套印總審查表，業務單位亦可透過平臺即時掌握各案件進度、申請類別、核對金額等資訊。繳費人歷年申報資料，透過以產製及廢棄物之相關性來建立決策樹模型，分析其物質關聯性之特徵指標，依此勾稽繳費人申報資料，篩選出疑似應納入產製徵收列管的繳費人名單，提供審理單位做後續追蹤查核。研析環保署與原物料、製程、產品等相關之資料庫，可透過固定空氣污染源管理資訊系統、事業廢棄物申報及管理資訊系統資料，並加以對應產品原物料代碼與收費辦法附表一徵收物質代碼之相關性，建立數據介接機制，勾稽比對出疑似產製產品之名單，擴大掌握與整治費徵收及審理作業相關之各項業務資料。本期計畫持續強化預算經費管理系統，增加預算支用進度表審核控制功能，包含審核後之鎖定與解鎖功能，並記錄歷次更新時間，以確保數據時間及資料的一致性。透過與環保署的BAF系統資料介接即時取得及紀錄，每月節省管理人員至BAF查詢資料及校對的時間。強化各填報欄位檢核邏輯與增加主動稽核警示機制，以提升預算經費管理品質，協助相關業務單位有效掌握預算經費的支用進度。彙整相關計畫經費預算及支用情形，完成包含「委辦計畫發包作業列管表」、「補助計畫核定作業列管表」及「對外資料-基金來源、用途及餘絀表」等報表的查詢與匯出功能，自動彙整填報統計資料，同時提升資料正確性。另整合預算經費管控系統與土水整治費申報系統收入與支用之數據，進行交叉比對，提供相關業務單位掌握基金收支現狀或預測性指標，管理及追蹤基金長期執行情形。

中文關鍵字

土壤及地下水、整治費、基金管理

類型	檔名	檔案大小	說明	最新版公開日期
期末報告	EPA-107-GA01-03-A214正式報告公開版.pdf	13MB	107年度工作執行成果公開版	2019/11/30 上午 12:00:00

摘要	The plan, which has been amended in accordance with the fees rules, continues to improve the Soil and Groundwater Pollution Remediation Fees Online Declaration and Inquiry System by adding new functions for supplementary application during non-application season, and system settings and identification of application season and non-application season time periods. The back-end of the system has added a list of payment vendors approved by the Environmental Protection Administration (EPA) as allowed to use the supplementary application zone. This helps facilitate fast completion of the supplementary application process. An exemption online application function has been added to the system. This comprises application review progress online management, proof document uploading, and review status click-and-sort functions. The upload function eliminates the problem of large amounts of paper for proof documents needing to be sent through the mail, which simplifies review procedures at the review unit and saves on printing and storage space. The customs import data supplementary application pre-filling function has been optimized. The system automatically compares all application data with the same company tax number from public and private payment vendors, and uses color-coding to indicate if the same item has been applied for by other subsidiaries. This avoids repeated applications, and reduces both problems in the subsequent reviewing process and overpayment. With regard to cross-season supplementary application itemized descriptions, the system has added a mechanism to automatically divide and import the information into the appropriate application season. This simplifies pre-processing review time spent dividing applications by season and improves efficiency. In order to help the remediation fee application review process move to a completely online, digitized format, functions have been developed and put in place for auto-comparison and exporting description differences; review data batch importing; and automatic division of applications by season. This will help the EPA to obtain data from each review process in a timely way. To promote online, digitized processes for insurance and engineering refund review, the back-end review function has been enhanced. Functions for saving and accessing relevant data and review process records have been added. Based on the complete review list auto-generated from the review results, operational units are able to use the platform to instantly access application progress, application type, and approved sums. Based on payers' historical application data, correlations between manufacturing and waste are used to establish decision-tree models; these allow analyzing the characteristics of the material correlations. Based on this, payer application data is audited; payers who apparently need to be included in the manufacturers levy monitoring list are selected. This list is provided to the reviewing unit for further monitoring and auditing. Analysis is made of the EPA database and the raw material, fabrication and product database. To this analysis is added the fixed air pollution source management information system; industrial waste application and management information system data; and correlations between product raw material codes and the collected material codes from the Annex I fee collection regulations. From all this, the data interface mechanism is established; auditing and comparison then produce a list of suspected manufacturing products. This process helps expands control over remediation fees and operations data related to the review process. The current plan continues to strengthen the budget management system, and increases review and control functions for the budget spending progress chart. The function includes a post-review locking/unlocking function, and records update timestamps to ensure data timing and information consistency. The information is obtained and recorded in a timely manner through the EPA's BAF system interface. This saves management personnel from spending time every month on checking and confirming information in BAF. The check logic of each filling field has been strengthened, and a proactive audit alert mechanism has been added. These raise budget management quality and facilitate relevant operational units effectively keeping tabs on budget spending progress. Budgeting and spending status of the relevant plans has been consolidated. Search and export functions are now fully integrated, including the Commissioning Plan Outsourced Operation Monitoring Report, Compensation Plan Approval Operations Monitoring Report, and the External Information, Funding Source, Usage and Surplus Report. Statistical data is automatically consolidated, which also increases data accuracy. Furthermore, data from the budget control system and income/expenses for the ground-and-water pollution remediation fee application system has been integrated. The system performs cross-checking; it also provides relevant operational units with the ability to manage current status and forecasting indications for fund income/expenses, and to manage and track long-term fund implementation status.
英文關鍵字	Soil and groundwater；Remediation Fees；Fund Management

摘要

The plan, which has been amended in accordance with the fees rules, continues to improve the Soil and Groundwater Pollution Remediation Fees Online Declaration and Inquiry System by adding new functions for supplementary application during non-application season, and system settings and identification of application season and non-application season time periods. The back-end of the system has added a list of payment vendors approved by the Environmental Protection Administration (EPA) as allowed to use the supplementary application zone. This helps facilitate fast completion of the supplementary application process. An exemption online application function has been added to the system. This comprises application review progress online management, proof document uploading, and review status click-and-sort functions. The upload function eliminates the problem of large amounts of paper for proof documents needing to be sent through the mail, which simplifies review procedures at the review unit and saves on printing and storage space. The customs import data supplementary application pre-filling function has been optimized. The system automatically compares all application data with the same company tax number from public and private payment vendors, and uses color-coding to indicate if the same item has been applied for by other subsidiaries. This avoids repeated applications, and reduces both problems in the subsequent reviewing process and overpayment. With regard to cross-season supplementary application itemized descriptions, the system has added a mechanism to automatically divide and import the information into the appropriate application season. This simplifies pre-processing review time spent dividing applications by season and improves efficiency. In order to help the remediation fee application review process move to a completely online, digitized format, functions have been developed and put in place for auto-comparison and exporting description differences; review data batch importing; and automatic division of applications by season. This will help the EPA to obtain data from each review process in a timely way. To promote online, digitized processes for insurance and engineering refund review, the back-end review function has been enhanced. Functions for saving and accessing relevant data and review process records have been added. Based on the complete review list auto-generated from the review results, operational units are able to use the platform to instantly access application progress, application type, and approved sums. Based on payers' historical application data, correlations between manufacturing and waste are used to establish decision-tree models; these allow analyzing the characteristics of the material correlations. Based on this, payer application data is audited; payers who apparently need to be included in the manufacturers levy monitoring list are selected. This list is provided to the reviewing unit for further monitoring and auditing. Analysis is made of the EPA database and the raw material, fabrication and product database. To this analysis is added the fixed air pollution source management information system; industrial waste application and management information system data; and correlations between product raw material codes and the collected material codes from the Annex I fee collection regulations. From all this, the data interface mechanism is established; auditing and comparison then produce a list of suspected manufacturing products. This process helps expands control over remediation fees and operations data related to the review process. The current plan continues to strengthen the budget management system, and increases review and control functions for the budget spending progress chart. The function includes a post-review locking/unlocking function, and records update timestamps to ensure data timing and information consistency. The information is obtained and recorded in a timely manner through the EPA's BAF system interface. This saves management personnel from spending time every month on checking and confirming information in BAF. The check logic of each filling field has been strengthened, and a proactive audit alert mechanism has been added. These raise budget management quality and facilitate relevant operational units effectively keeping tabs on budget spending progress. Budgeting and spending status of the relevant plans has been consolidated. Search and export functions are now fully integrated, including the Commissioning Plan Outsourced Operation Monitoring Report, Compensation Plan Approval Operations Monitoring Report, and the External Information, Funding Source, Usage and Surplus Report. Statistical data is automatically consolidated, which also increases data accuracy. Furthermore, data from the budget control system and income/expenses for the ground-and-water pollution remediation fee application system has been integrated. The system performs cross-checking; it also provides relevant operational units with the ability to manage current status and forecasting indications for fund income/expenses, and to manage and track long-term fund implementation status.

英文關鍵字

Soil and groundwater；Remediation Fees；Fund Management