環保專案成果報告查詢系統

專案計畫編號
經費年度	107
計畫經費	7,808 千元
預算科目	土壤及地下水污染整治策略規劃
專案開始日期	2018/11/12
專案結束日期	2020/05/11
專案主持人	魏敏裕
主辦單位	土污基管會
承辦人	陳育廷
執行單位	晶淨科技股份有限公司
專案分類	土壤及地下水
中文關鍵字	土壤及地下水污染整治費收費辦法、土壤及地下水污染整治基金、土壤及地下水整治費
英文關鍵字	Regulations Governing Collection of Soil and Groundwater Pollution Remediation Fees, the Soil and Groundwater Pollution Remediation Fund, Soil and Groundwater Remediation Fees
協同主持人	黃智
共同主持人
計畫聯絡人	陳妤亭
計畫聯絡電話	02-25790020#333
計畫聯絡信箱	eco.chen333@gmail.com

中文摘要	土壤及地下水污染整治費收費辦法修正施行已逾2年，因此本計畫工作重點除持續檢視土壤及地下水污染整治費徵收成效、協助推動整治費徵收運作制度與課徵作業，並對於後續基金規模之需求、整治費退費制度，以及收費辦法公告項目與費率調整等提出建議規劃，亦將針對所提之調整方案、修正草案進行各項經濟面衝擊評估及其配套措施。本計畫執行成果包括： 1.分析整治費徵收現況，並完成548件（362家）整治費申報複審案件、39件出口退費申請案件、41件保險退費、25件工程退費與20場次現場查核及分析作業。 2.研析土壤及地下水資訊管理系統(SGM)污染場址整治資料，更新整治成本公式之參數，並估算未來整治基金需求為282.41億元，規劃整治費徵收方案，提出受影響產業及脆弱產業，以及進行總體經濟衝擊，作為後續研提費基之依據。 3.配合環保署施政情境，建立新增公告項目篩選流程，逐一檢視相關物質及廢棄物，針對具土壤及地下水污染風險之物質及廢棄物提出建議徵收方案。 4.依據工程保險退費之分析結果，提出整治費退費制度轉型方案，並徵詢業者及專家學者意見，優化現行工程退費流程，並建議加入綠色整治工程，作為後續獎勵措施的設計重點。 5.配合整治費繳費人申報金額結構，完成提出整治費申報簡化方案，並以問卷方式徵詢繳費人意見，提供後續施政參考，以達簡政便民。 6.完成3場次專家諮詢會議，研議(1)工程及保險退費制度轉型方案、(2)探討整治成本計算與基金需求規模、(3)信用保證制度建制等議題，以及整治費申繳頻率調整、電子化代收、工程保險退費轉型等議題之問卷統計分析，並納入後續修法之參考。
中文關鍵字	土壤及地下水污染整治費收費辦法、土壤及地下水污染整治基金、土壤及地下水整治費

中文摘要

土壤及地下水污染整治費收費辦法修正施行已逾2年，因此本計畫工作重點除持續檢視土壤及地下水污染整治費徵收成效、協助推動整治費徵收運作制度與課徵作業，並對於後續基金規模之需求、整治費退費制度，以及收費辦法公告項目與費率調整等提出建議規劃，亦將針對所提之調整方案、修正草案進行各項經濟面衝擊評估及其配套措施。本計畫執行成果包括： 1.分析整治費徵收現況，並完成548件（362家）整治費申報複審案件、39件出口退費申請案件、41件保險退費、25件工程退費與20場次現場查核及分析作業。 2.研析土壤及地下水資訊管理系統(SGM)污染場址整治資料，更新整治成本公式之參數，並估算未來整治基金需求為282.41億元，規劃整治費徵收方案，提出受影響產業及脆弱產業，以及進行總體經濟衝擊，作為後續研提費基之依據。 3.配合環保署施政情境，建立新增公告項目篩選流程，逐一檢視相關物質及廢棄物，針對具土壤及地下水污染風險之物質及廢棄物提出建議徵收方案。 4.依據工程保險退費之分析結果，提出整治費退費制度轉型方案，並徵詢業者及專家學者意見，優化現行工程退費流程，並建議加入綠色整治工程，作為後續獎勵措施的設計重點。 5.配合整治費繳費人申報金額結構，完成提出整治費申報簡化方案，並以問卷方式徵詢繳費人意見，提供後續施政參考，以達簡政便民。 6.完成3場次專家諮詢會議，研議(1)工程及保險退費制度轉型方案、(2)探討整治成本計算與基金需求規模、(3)信用保證制度建制等議題，以及整治費申繳頻率調整、電子化代收、工程保險退費轉型等議題之問卷統計分析，並納入後續修法之參考。

中文關鍵字

土壤及地下水污染整治費收費辦法、土壤及地下水污染整治基金、土壤及地下水整治費

類型	檔名	檔案大小	說明	最新版公開日期
期末報告	期末報告(上傳).pdf	0MB	期末報告	2020/9/30 上午 12:00:00

摘要	The modified Regulations Governing Collection of Soil and Groundwater Pollution Remediation Fees has been implemented for two years. Therefore, other than the constant investigation of the effectiveness in collecting the soil and groundwater pollution remediation fee and assisting on both the promotion of remediation fee collection system and collection operation, the key objective of the program also included proposing the planning suggestion for the demand of the subsequent funding, the refund system of the remediation fee, as well as the announcements for the charging methods and the rate adjustment. Moreover, the various economic impact and the package measures for the proposed adjustment plans and the modification plans are evaluated. The implementation result for the program is listed below: 1.The current situation of remediation fee collection is analyzed and accomplished a total of 548 cases (from 362 companies) of secondary review on remediation fee declaration, 39 cases of exporting refund applications, 41 cases of insurance refund, 25 cases of engineering refund, and 20 times of on-site inspection and analysis. 2.The remediation data of contaminated sites on Soil and Groundwater Information Management System (SGM) is analyzed that the parameters for estimating the remediation fee are revised. The demand for future remediation fund is estimated at around $2824.1 billion dollars. In addition, the remediation fee collection plans were proposed at which pointed out the affected and the most-affected industries, as well as an evaluation on the overall economic impact as the accordance for subsequent research budget. 3.Coordinated with the Environmental Protection Administration policies, a screening procedure for the new announcement items of individual substances and wastes is established. A fee collection program is proposed for the substances and wastes with soil and groundwater pollution risks.. 4.A transformation program for remediation fee refund system is proposed based on the analysis result of engineering insurance refund. The proposed program optimized the current engineering refund process with the opinions consulted from dealers, experts, and scholars, as well as a suggestion of incorporating green mediation engineering as the focal point for designing the future incentives. 5.Coordinated with the rate structure of remediation fee declared by the fee payers, a simplified solution for remediation fee declaration is proposed. The opinion from fee payers collected through questionnaires is investigated as references for the future administration in order to achieve streamline administration for the convenience to the public. 6.A total of three expert consultation meetings are completed with different themes (1) the transformation program for engineering and insurance refund system, (2) the discussion on the calculation of remediation cost and the scale of fund demand, (3) the establishment of credit guarantee system as well as the questionnaire on the adjustment on the declaration frequency of remediation fee, the electronic collection, and the engineering insurance refund transformation to be included as the reference for future law modification.
英文關鍵字	Regulations Governing Collection of Soil and Groundwater Pollution Remediation Fees, the Soil and Groundwater Pollution Remediation Fund, Soil and Groundwater Remediation Fees

摘要

The modified Regulations Governing Collection of Soil and Groundwater Pollution Remediation Fees has been implemented for two years. Therefore, other than the constant investigation of the effectiveness in collecting the soil and groundwater pollution remediation fee and assisting on both the promotion of remediation fee collection system and collection operation, the key objective of the program also included proposing the planning suggestion for the demand of the subsequent funding, the refund system of the remediation fee, as well as the announcements for the charging methods and the rate adjustment. Moreover, the various economic impact and the package measures for the proposed adjustment plans and the modification plans are evaluated. The implementation result for the program is listed below: 1.The current situation of remediation fee collection is analyzed and accomplished a total of 548 cases (from 362 companies) of secondary review on remediation fee declaration, 39 cases of exporting refund applications, 41 cases of insurance refund, 25 cases of engineering refund, and 20 times of on-site inspection and analysis. 2.The remediation data of contaminated sites on Soil and Groundwater Information Management System (SGM) is analyzed that the parameters for estimating the remediation fee are revised. The demand for future remediation fund is estimated at around $2824.1 billion dollars. In addition, the remediation fee collection plans were proposed at which pointed out the affected and the most-affected industries, as well as an evaluation on the overall economic impact as the accordance for subsequent research budget. 3.Coordinated with the Environmental Protection Administration policies, a screening procedure for the new announcement items of individual substances and wastes is established. A fee collection program is proposed for the substances and wastes with soil and groundwater pollution risks.. 4.A transformation program for remediation fee refund system is proposed based on the analysis result of engineering insurance refund. The proposed program optimized the current engineering refund process with the opinions consulted from dealers, experts, and scholars, as well as a suggestion of incorporating green mediation engineering as the focal point for designing the future incentives. 5.Coordinated with the rate structure of remediation fee declared by the fee payers, a simplified solution for remediation fee declaration is proposed. The opinion from fee payers collected through questionnaires is investigated as references for the future administration in order to achieve streamline administration for the convenience to the public. 6.A total of three expert consultation meetings are completed with different themes (1) the transformation program for engineering and insurance refund system, (2) the discussion on the calculation of remediation cost and the scale of fund demand, (3) the establishment of credit guarantee system as well as the questionnaire on the adjustment on the declaration frequency of remediation fee, the electronic collection, and the engineering insurance refund transformation to be included as the reference for future law modification.

英文關鍵字

Regulations Governing Collection of Soil and Groundwater Pollution Remediation Fees, the Soil and Groundwater Pollution Remediation Fund, Soil and Groundwater Remediation Fees