環保專案成果報告查詢系統

專案計畫編號
經費年度	108
計畫經費	6,400 千元
專案開始日期	2019/04/10
專案結束日期	2020/04/09
專案主持人	何宗安
主辦單位	嘉義縣環境保護局
承辦人	侯雅馨
執行單位	新系環境技術有限公司
專案分類	大氣空氣
中文關鍵字	空氣品質管理發展計畫
英文關鍵字	Air Pollution Management Plan
協同主持人
共同主持人
計畫聯絡人	張美華
計畫聯絡電話	05-3621750#18
計畫聯絡信箱	aqmp@cyepb.gov.tw

中文摘要	空氣污染防制法自民國六十四年五月二十三日經制訂公告以來，隨著對空氣污染物排放特性掌握程度趨於成熟與完備及民眾對環保意識的抬高，近年來各項管制標準不斷趨嚴而管制對象也越趨於完備。但由於空氣污染物排放特性複雜，以嘉義縣(以下簡稱本縣)空氣品質而言，空氣污染指標(AQI)>150之日數近4年雖有轉趨改善，但仍以臭氧(O3)及懸浮微粒(PM2.5)為主要之污染指標成分。顯示僅就個別排放源管制，對空氣品質仍未有顯著之改善，因此以整體性空氣污染排放管制之考量方式，即空氣品質管理發展計畫便因應而生。本縣環保局為使環保基金功能有效發揮及落實督導查核各委辦計畫之執行成效，遂整合SIP提出「空氣品質管理發展計畫」，本計畫所擔任的角色係以協助環保局的立場，督促各項管制工作之執行進度及品質，同時彙整分析各計畫之執行成效及歷年空氣品質狀況，研擬出可行之空氣品質改善對策與應變措施，具體地推動空氣污染管制工作。另外亦期使環保基金能更有效監督與運用，且配合環保署考評方式進行子計畫管制，以達到空氣污染管制之最大績效，並爭取環保署空污基金最高之撥交比例。綜合上述，108年度空氣品質管理發展計畫在定位上以達成績效指標及環境指標為努力方向，其中績效指標為執行完整之成效管制方式，以環保署績效考評辦法為基礎，協助環保局督促各項管制工作之執行進度及品質；在環境指標部份則為透過空品分析及本縣排放量修正更新，就本縣地方污染特性，規劃本縣空品目標與管制策略，並訂定各計畫污染物減量目標與檢討達成情形。此外並規劃短中長程管制策略，擬定下年度及未來空氣品質改善計畫之執行重點，有系統地規劃及研定本縣改善空氣品質之時間表。
中文關鍵字	空氣品質管理發展計畫

中文摘要

空氣污染防制法自民國六十四年五月二十三日經制訂公告以來，隨著對空氣污染物排放特性掌握程度趨於成熟與完備及民眾對環保意識的抬高，近年來各項管制標準不斷趨嚴而管制對象也越趨於完備。但由於空氣污染物排放特性複雜，以嘉義縣(以下簡稱本縣)空氣品質而言，空氣污染指標(AQI)>150之日數近4年雖有轉趨改善，但仍以臭氧(O3)及懸浮微粒(PM2.5)為主要之污染指標成分。顯示僅就個別排放源管制，對空氣品質仍未有顯著之改善，因此以整體性空氣污染排放管制之考量方式，即空氣品質管理發展計畫便因應而生。本縣環保局為使環保基金功能有效發揮及落實督導查核各委辦計畫之執行成效，遂整合SIP提出「空氣品質管理發展計畫」，本計畫所擔任的角色係以協助環保局的立場，督促各項管制工作之執行進度及品質，同時彙整分析各計畫之執行成效及歷年空氣品質狀況，研擬出可行之空氣品質改善對策與應變措施，具體地推動空氣污染管制工作。另外亦期使環保基金能更有效監督與運用，且配合環保署考評方式進行子計畫管制，以達到空氣污染管制之最大績效，並爭取環保署空污基金最高之撥交比例。綜合上述，108年度空氣品質管理發展計畫在定位上以達成績效指標及環境指標為努力方向，其中績效指標為執行完整之成效管制方式，以環保署績效考評辦法為基礎，協助環保局督促各項管制工作之執行進度及品質；在環境指標部份則為透過空品分析及本縣排放量修正更新，就本縣地方污染特性，規劃本縣空品目標與管制策略，並訂定各計畫污染物減量目標與檢討達成情形。此外並規劃短中長程管制策略，擬定下年度及未來空氣品質改善計畫之執行重點，有系統地規劃及研定本縣改善空氣品質之時間表。

中文關鍵字

空氣品質管理發展計畫

類型	檔名	檔案大小	說明	最新版公開日期
期末報告	本文.pdf	32MB	108年度期末報告-定稿本	2020/8/12 上午 12:00:00

摘要	Since the announcement of the Air Pollution Control Act on May 23, 1975, the regulatory standards have continued to be tightened and control targets have been better monitored in recent years with the more mature and comprehensive command on the characteristics of air pollutant emission, along with higher public awareness of environmental protection. However, due to the complicated air pollutant emission characteristics, the air quality in Chiayi County (hereinafter referred to as the County) is used as an example; although the number of days with air pollution indicators (AQI)>150 in the County has been improving in the past four years, ozone (O3) and fine particulate matter 2.5 (PM2.5) remain the main contributors to air pollution. It seems that the control on individual emissions has not significantly improved the air quality. Therefore, in consideration of the overall air pollution emission control method, the air quality management development plan was initiated. In order to effectively implement the functions of the environmental education fund, while supervising and ensuring the effectiveness of the implementation of various committees, the Environmental Protection Bureau of the County has integrated the SIP to propose the “Air Quality Management Development Plan.” The Plan plays a role in assisting the Environmental Protection Bureau in supervising the progress and quality of implementing various control tasks, and simultaneously in compiling and analyzing the implementation effectiveness of each project and the air quality status over the years. It develops feasible air quality improvement and contingency measures to specifically improve air quality and enforce air pollution control. In addition, in order to effectively supervise and utilize the environmental education fund, the sub-plan control will be implemented to achieve the maximum performance of air pollution control that is in line with the evaluation method set by the Environmental Protection Administration (EPA), and to strive for the highest allocation proportion of the EPA’s Air Pollution Control Fund. Based on the above, the 2019 air quality management development plan aimed to enhance both the performance and environmental indicators. The performance indicator refers to the implementation of a complete effectiveness control method based on the performance evaluation method of the Environmental Production Bureau, in order to help the Bureau supervise the progress and quality of implementing various control tasks. As for the environmental indicator, the County’s air quality objectives and control strategies were planned, and various plans to reduce pollutants and review the situation were formulated via analyzing air quality and revising and updating the amount of emissions of the County from the perspective of its pollution characteristics. In addition, short-, medium- and long-term control strategies were planned to formulate the key points of implementing air quality improvement plans in the following years, in order to systematically plan and study the timetable for improving air quality in the County.
英文關鍵字	Air Pollution Management Plan

摘要

Since the announcement of the Air Pollution Control Act on May 23, 1975, the regulatory standards have continued to be tightened and control targets have been better monitored in recent years with the more mature and comprehensive command on the characteristics of air pollutant emission, along with higher public awareness of environmental protection. However, due to the complicated air pollutant emission characteristics, the air quality in Chiayi County (hereinafter referred to as the County) is used as an example; although the number of days with air pollution indicators (AQI)>150 in the County has been improving in the past four years, ozone (O3) and fine particulate matter 2.5 (PM2.5) remain the main contributors to air pollution. It seems that the control on individual emissions has not significantly improved the air quality. Therefore, in consideration of the overall air pollution emission control method, the air quality management development plan was initiated. In order to effectively implement the functions of the environmental education fund, while supervising and ensuring the effectiveness of the implementation of various committees, the Environmental Protection Bureau of the County has integrated the SIP to propose the “Air Quality Management Development Plan.” The Plan plays a role in assisting the Environmental Protection Bureau in supervising the progress and quality of implementing various control tasks, and simultaneously in compiling and analyzing the implementation effectiveness of each project and the air quality status over the years. It develops feasible air quality improvement and contingency measures to specifically improve air quality and enforce air pollution control. In addition, in order to effectively supervise and utilize the environmental education fund, the sub-plan control will be implemented to achieve the maximum performance of air pollution control that is in line with the evaluation method set by the Environmental Protection Administration (EPA), and to strive for the highest allocation proportion of the EPA’s Air Pollution Control Fund. Based on the above, the 2019 air quality management development plan aimed to enhance both the performance and environmental indicators. The performance indicator refers to the implementation of a complete effectiveness control method based on the performance evaluation method of the Environmental Production Bureau, in order to help the Bureau supervise the progress and quality of implementing various control tasks. As for the environmental indicator, the County’s air quality objectives and control strategies were planned, and various plans to reduce pollutants and review the situation were formulated via analyzing air quality and revising and updating the amount of emissions of the County from the perspective of its pollution characteristics. In addition, short-, medium- and long-term control strategies were planned to formulate the key points of implementing air quality improvement plans in the following years, in order to systematically plan and study the timetable for improving air quality in the County.

英文關鍵字

Air Pollution Management Plan