EPA-92-E102-02-700

092

1,010 千元

2003/06/25

2003/12/31

彭衍順

綜計處

財團法人環境資源研究發展基金會

科技計畫

國家環境保護計畫，地方環境保護計畫，環境指標

National Environmental Protection Program,Local Environmental Protection Program,Environmental Indicator

黃馨儀

0223753013ext155

jessice815@hotmail.com

本計畫主要工作內容為國家環境保護計畫及地方環境保護計畫，在國家環境保護計畫部分，主要工作重點為檢討修訂相關之環境指標；在地方環境保護計畫部份，主要工作重點為檢視現有地方環境指標之屬性、地方環境保護計畫撰寫法制格式化之輔導、輔導地方研訂環境指標及國外推動環境保護計畫相關資訊之蒐集。並藉由相關會議之召開，達成本計畫預期之工作項目。 在國家環境保護計畫部份，本團隊依據現有國家環境保護計畫指標之修訂及建議未來應增擬之環境指標等原則，檢討修訂相關之環境指標。在現有國家環境保護計畫指標之修訂建議部分，檢討修訂之方向分別為應刪除之指標與應修訂之指標；在建議未來應增擬之環境指標部分，則彙整「台灣永續發展指標系統」與其它國家或組織之相關指標資料，作為未來增擬國家環境指標之依據。 在地方環境保護計畫部分，首先透過分區之輔導會議，研擬「制訂流程」及「計畫內容」兩大主軸為本（92）年度輔導工作重點項目，輔導各縣市研擬符合地方環境保護計畫相關之撰寫格式版本。而縣市地方環境保護計畫指標之輔導，則區分為一般性適用指標與地方特色性指標兩大部分，其採用之輔導機制分別是由上而下與由下而上，指標輔導之成果亦在分區輔導會議時展現。 就審視現有地方環境保護計畫指標而言，其評估基準分別是國家環境保護計畫指標之共通性、地方特色性之專屬性、指標性質之適宜性、與其它計畫配合之關連性。在蒐集國外資訊方面，則以與我國國情相仿之日本為研究主體，針對其推動環境基本計畫之相關過程，並分析其法源依據、策定流程，執行狀況及其相關計畫之組織分工狀態與管理機制，作為未來我國修訂地方環境保護計畫相關法制工作之參考依據。 為使本年度專案計畫之工作項目能順利進行，九月初本團隊於環保署召開起始會議，說明本年度推動地方環境保護計畫之重點、執行策略與指標輔導相關事宜。並於九月底至十一月上旬，分別進行六場之地方輔導會議，以「計畫型態」與「指標研擬」為輔導主軸，希冀透過分區輔導會議之機制，使各縣市能早日制訂符合環保署所訂之地方環境保護計畫撰寫格式及相關法制作業之版本。最後，十二月十日於環保署召開期末檢討會議，作為本年度推動地方環境保護計畫之成果交流與綜合研討。

國家環境保護計畫，地方環境保護計畫，環境指標

0000069997.pdf

10MB

[期末報告]公開完整版

2004/3/1 上午 12:00:00

The aims of this project are implementing both National Environmental Protection Program (NEPP) and Local Environmental Protection Program (LEPP).Concerning NEPP, the objectives are completed by both surveying the environmental indicators currently presented in NEPP and proposing the potentially appropriate indicators adopting in the future edition of NEPP. To survey the currently environmental indicators, the works are carried out by both deleting and amending the indicators. Based on the Taiwan Sustainable Development Indicator System and other indicators popular among other nations, some valuable indicators are proposing to adopt in the future edition of NEPP. As to LEPP, the legalized formation of LEPP is fulfilled by counseling meetings held in six different areas. For assisting local governments in setting up both general and locally specialized environmental indicators, the methodologies are top down and bottom up. Results of assisted environmental indicators are presented in counseling meetings. With regard to investigating the characteristics of local environmental indicators, the criteria are generalization of NEPP, specialization of local aspects, appropriation of indicator and connection of other related programs. Regarding collecting the related information from overseas countries, the Environmental Protection Program of Japan provides with useful information and conceptions for future modification of both NEPP and LEPP in Taiwan. In order to accomplish all objectives set in this project, some meetings are convened. Firstly, the initialized meeting held in the beginning of September is intended to illustrate the important aims, implementing strategies and other related issues in this project. From the end of September to the beginning of November, six counseling meetings held to illuminate both the planning system and established indicators. Eventually, a final meeting held on tenth December is to illustrate all achievements done in this project and to communicate mutually for obtaining the consensus.

National Environmental Protection Program,Local Environmental Protection Program,Environmental Indicator