EPA-92-HA15-03-A122

092

3,100 千元

2003/04/30

2004/03/31

林俊旭

回收基管會

財團法人環境資源研究發展基金會

化學物質管理

資源回收、公告回收項目、分析層級程序,,

Resource Recycling, Designated Recycling Items,AHP

陳昶宇、溫麗琪

林俊旭

02-23753013 轉 182

chlin@ier.org.tw

環保署為提升資訊等類別物品之妥善回收，特委辦此計畫以評估目前可再納入公告回收範圍之物品。本計畫首先調查先進國家如歐盟、瑞典、德國、韓國與日本目前資訊類物品回收體系現況。再以問卷調查一般消費者、繳費責任業者、回收處理機構對於十五項評估項目之回收意願、所持理由及其過去之報廢模式。此外，工作團隊亦於台北市南區垃圾分類場調查目前尚未公告之十五項評估項目的回收現況，並委託處理業者根據目前其處理廠內運作情形，以書面方式預估處理成本及資源化價值。再由處理廠協助拆解各項物品，分析其組成與材質。 基本資料調查完成後，以分析層級程序法（Analytic Hierarchy Process, AHP）進行評估，得到十五項受評估項目的應回收優先順序。之後針對前五項優先材質計算將來公告之後的合理費率，也因此調查相關費率因子，如生產量、進出口量與營業量等。上述工作完成後，工作團隊邀請委員至處理廠現勘試運轉情形，以瞭解受評估產品的處理流程、人工處理成本、市場流通體系等。而後召開五場說明會，蒐集責任業者、回收處理業者與環保局之意見與建議。最後於各項資料收集彙整後，也對後續法制作業制訂與相關配套措施提供參考意見。

資源回收、公告回收項目、分析層級程序,,

0000096944.zip

4MB

[期末報告]公開完整版

2004/10/1 上午 12:00:00

The purpose of this project, Feasibility analysis for the expansion of the Designated Recycling Items List of information technology and telecommunication products, is to evaluate the possibility of including new due-to-recycle products from 15 candidate items. This project was started with data collection through telephone interviews and field investigations. Data collected can be classified into two types: 1. opinions of consumers, recycling business operators and environmental protection officials towards the recycling of new items, and, 2. basic physical information about the 15 evaluated products and their status in the municipal waste streams. After collecting the fundamental information about the 15 items, the research team conducted the procedure of Analytic Hierarchy Process to determine the priority of recycling of these 15 items. At the same time, thorough analysis on the first five items from the evaluation results was proceeded to clarify the material components including hazardous contents of each product. Also information about the factors determining the recycling fee of each of the five products, such as the amounts of annual sales nationwide and the net costs of recycling operation, were acquired and the future recycling fees were thus estimated. Besides, five forum meetings about the recycling of the top five new items were held to gather opinions from the perspectives of stakeholders. Finally, based on the synthesized information through this entire project, the research team made conclusions on the recycling necessity of the 15 evaluated items and suggestions for supplementary instrument installation or recycling regulation changes in the future.

Resource Recycling, Designated Recycling Items,AHP