EPA-00001

094

1,824 千元

2005/06/15

2006/02/28

徐哲敏

南投縣政府環境保護局

松暉工程顧問有限公司

大氣空氣

露天燃燒

open burning

徐哲敏

04-24259193

shec@seed.net.tw

有關本年度「公私場所臭味及禁止露天燃燒管制及改善計畫」，執行期程為2005年6月15日至2006年2月28日止，計畫成果如下： 一、巡查管制作業 為有效落實惡臭味管制作業成效，對於管制作業依據性質類別分為主動的一般性巡查、專案性巡查(輔導改善追蹤)及協助陳情案件查察。而露天燃燒具有時效性，除了一般性巡查作業與協助機動處理民眾陳情案件外，配合稻作收成季節加強巡查稻作種植區域露天燃燒案件。目前協助陳情處理及確實露天燃燒事實之巡查案件523處次，一般例行性臭味巡查輔導及配合即時處理空污陳情案件208處次。 露天燃燒陳情案變化趨勢，由2003年之13.3件/月下降至2005年度之9.9件/月；另惡臭味之陳情案亦由2003年之26.5件/月逐年下降至2005年度之12.3件/月。顯示管制計畫之執行對於本縣陳情案件之降低有其相當程度之幫助。 二、臭味源採樣檢測作業 針對惡臭污染源陳情案件進行採樣，樣品則委託合格之檢測公司進行臭味檢測。採樣及檢測方法依照環保署公告的標準方法，臭味及異味官能測定法(三點比較式嗅袋法)執行。完成公私場所之臭味源檢測20點，包括9處(11點)臭味陳情案件採樣，其中7處超過標準均依規定查處並要求改善。另為評估畜牧場臭味輔導作業成效，共進行9點之臭味源採樣檢測工作，其中2點超過標準。 三、宣導及輔導污染改善作業 提供新聞稿8則，於一、二期稻作期間執行9日廣播，執行有線電視插播式字幕(跑馬燈)1次，製作摺頁宣導文件500份，廣告夾報或巡查人員於巡查輔導時發送宣導手冊400份。 共辦理七場次公開宣導說明會，參加人數計374人，其中包含4場次非露天燃燒處理技術宣導說明會、1場次中元普渡紙錢妥善處理宣導說明會、1場次臭味源改善處理技術宣導說明會及1場次畜牧業座談會。 畜牧場臭味防制宣導說明會及接受輔導業者座談會出席率分別為64%及80%，顯示業者對於臭味防制之重視逐漸提升，帶動其參與意願提高，而達到宣導效果。 本年度篩選10處養豬場進行臭味源輔導改善處理，並提出臭味控制改善技術與策略建議改善方式。9場接受臭味採樣檢測業者中，僅2場之檢測值超過標準值，顯示本次輔導成效良好。 四、露天燃燒污染減量 本計畫執行露天燃燒頻繁區巡查，對於發現露天燃燒情事並進行撲滅。一般廢棄物露天燃燒，撲滅後剩餘物料估計約為241388公斤。污染削減量計總懸浮微粒(TSP)削減約1932kg、PM10削減約1898kg、SOx削減約15kg、NOx削減約489kg、CO削減約16706kg、THC削減約2914kg與NMHC削減約2331kg。 依據燃燒負荷係數、排放係數，推估尋獲並阻止露天燃燒農業廢棄物的剩餘物料估計約為77995公斤。經由排放量推估公式計算可得動各類污染物削減效益，各污染削減量推估總懸浮微粒(TSP)削減約552kg、PM10削減約249kg、SOx削減約4kg、NOx削減約201kg、CO削減約4995kg、THC削減約417kg與NMHC削減約189kg。

露天燃燒

ntbur-94f.pdf

16MB

[期末報告]

2006/11/1 上午 12:00:00

'This plan promoted odor and burning pollution ban control and improvement in the public and premises for this year. The execution period was from June 15, 2005 to February 28, 2006. The achievements were briefed as follows. 1. Inspection For the objective of an effective odor control plan, the inspection works were classified as normal inspection, special inspection, and special inspection caused by people’s complaint, according to the operation types. However, open burning should be controlled in time. In addition to normal inspection and special inspection caused by people’s complaint, during the rice harvest season, the paddy area was inspected frequently. The execution number was 523 for Special inspection caused by people’s complaint and other actual open burning cases. Normal inspection and special inspection caused by people’s complaint totaled 208 cases for odor sources. The open burning report figure showed a drop from 13.3 cases per month in 2003 to 9.9 cases per month in 2005. The odor report figure also showed a drop from 26.5 cases per month in 2003 to 12.3 cases per month in 2005. It revealed that the control plan execution was effective in reducing people’s complaint cases. 2. Sampling and measuring for the odor source The odor sources complained by people should be sampled. The sampling would be performed by a qualified analytical laboratory. The sampling and testing method would be performed according to environmental protection standard methods announced officially by EPA (using comparison sample bags). 20 odor sources sampling was carried out in the public and premises, including 11 odor cases in 9 places complained by people. 7 samples were found over the regulation among them, and the odor sources were requested for improvement. For the livestock industry odor improvement assessment, 9 odor sources sampling was carried out of which 2 samples were found over the requirement of the regulation. 3. Announcement and assistance for pollution improvement Offering 8 news releases, carrying out radio announcements for 9 days, one cable TV announcement inserting the sowing type with subtitles (horse race light), 500 folding handout, and advertising inserts in the newspaper during first and second harvest times. Delivering 400 manuals to local farmers during patrolling and coaching. 7 sessions were held publicly. The number of participants was 374. Including 4 non-open burning treatment technology sessions, 1 session related to disposal of mock paper money on Chongyuan Festival, 1 session related to odor source improvement and 1 session related livestock breeding. Odor control interpretation for Livestock industry and informal discussion meeting had 64% and 80% of attendance. This showed an increasing in the number of farmers who cared about odor control, and reached the result of leading. Ten pig farms were selected for improving odor control program for this year, which led to odor control improvement technique and advise for better change for plans. Within 9 testing farms, only two odor sampling sources failed to comply with the regulation. This showed the assistance program had a good result. 4. Burning pollution decrement in the open The patrol for open burning was carried out in high frequent area. When the burning was found, the extermination was putting in place. For general waste incineration, 241,388 kg remainders were estimated after extermination. Total pollutant was reduced about 1932kg TSP, 1898kg PM10, 15kg SOx, 489kg NOx, 16706kg CO, 2914kg THC and 2331kg NMHC. According to the burning loading coefficient, discharge coefficient, the surpluses were estimated about 77,995kg after agricultural waste open burning was prevented. It was estimated through the calculation of Pollution Estimate Formulae that total pollutant was reduced about 552kg TSP, 249kg PM10, 4kg SOx, 201kg NOx, 4995kg CO, 417kg THC and 189kg NMHC.

open burning