環保專案成果報告查詢系統

專案計畫編號
經費年度	097
計畫經費	6,114 千元
專案開始日期	2008/04/01
專案結束日期	2009/03/31
專案主持人	施桂英
主辦單位	臺中市政府環境保護局
承辦人
執行單位	台灣曼寧工程顧問股份有限公司
專案分類	大氣空氣
中文關鍵字	空氣,空氣品質,品質,維護,綜合,管理,計畫
英文關鍵字	Air Quality,maintenance,general,management,program
協同主持人
共同主持人
計畫聯絡人	蘇憶貞
計畫聯絡電話	04-23293771
計畫聯絡信箱	cems@teepb.gov.tw

中文摘要	97年臺中縣於環保署考核績效持續獲得「優等」殊榮，97年考評總分86.50分，較96年進步1.72分。 97年度編列25項空污計畫(含補助計畫)，在固定源管制編列5項計畫、移動源管制編列5項計畫、逸散源管制編列5項計畫、其他專案編列4項計畫及補助計畫編列6項，97年編列空污費總計199,384仟元，總計削減量6691.5公噸。本計畫依據「臺中縣環保局空氣污染防制業務委辦計畫考核作業要點」所訂定之8項考評指標(「資料提交管考」、「合約工作量」、「環保署報表」、「委員督導查核及期中(末)審查會議考核」、「人員異動」、「有具體成效或提升滿意度之做法」、「計畫成果宣導效益」、「計畫團隊執行成效及作業配合度」，於97年4月至98年2月執行空污計畫督導考核工作，97年空污管制計畫之考核成績以洗街計畫得分成績87.8最高，其次為營建計畫87.1分第2名、連線計畫87.0分第3名。在會議辦理方面，計完成2場業務執行檢討研商小組會議、4場工作檢討協調會、6場督導考核會議、1場成果檢討會議、出席96-97年空污計畫審查會議、1場98年環保署考評要點講習會、3場專家學者諮詢會議、1場98年度空氣污染防制計畫工作項目協商會議、2場中部空品區交流會議、1場新聞稿講習會議、1場政策專題演講會議、2場聯席會議、1場經驗交流會議、9場次空品區工作協商會議、1場次空氣污染防制計畫審查會議及問卷調查結果說明會，總計辦理35場會議。在96年空氣污染防制計畫追踪檢討，空氣品質目標訂有4項指標，僅PM10之年濃度目標未符合規劃目標。固定源管制目標訂有6項指標，僅1項指標未達目標，為「針對高MIR/VOCS公私場所清查輔導製程改善及新增或提升既有防制措施之家數」達成率為0%，無法明確提出減量。移動源管制目標訂有6項指標，全部達到規劃目標值。逸散源管制目標訂有8項指標，有2項指標未達成目標值，分別為「裸露地揚塵或綠化改善面積」及「縣轄內紙錢集中燃燒噸數」，達成率分別僅64.7%及58.1%。污染物減量目標訂有10項指標，有3項指標未達成目標，分別為「加強非法油品稽查取締作業」、「柴油車老舊車輛汰換-NMHC及CO」、「裸露地提升防制面積」，其餘7項指標之達成率均達100%。在問卷調查之環保施政認知中，最為民眾所知道的施政項目依序包括推動21鄉鎮市提供175站機車免費定檢服務(74.3%, 782人)、提供洗街車(掃街車)進行街道洗掃服務(69.8% 735人)、減少紙錢焚燒並於中元節時提供集中清運至焚化爐焚燒服務(69.2%, 729人)、路邊巡查未定檢機車與通知機車未定檢車主進行定檢之服務(63.7%, 671人)與加油站張貼宣導不得強迫加滿油海報以維縣民健康(56.8%, 598人)，這些施政的項目約有六成以上之縣民，普遍都能感受到環保局對於民眾健康與環境品質維護之用心。
中文關鍵字	空氣,空氣品質,品質,維護,綜合,管理,計畫

中文摘要

97年臺中縣於環保署考核績效持續獲得「優等」殊榮，97年考評總分86.50分，較96年進步1.72分。 97年度編列25項空污計畫(含補助計畫)，在固定源管制編列5項計畫、移動源管制編列5項計畫、逸散源管制編列5項計畫、其他專案編列4項計畫及補助計畫編列6項，97年編列空污費總計199,384仟元，總計削減量6691.5公噸。本計畫依據「臺中縣環保局空氣污染防制業務委辦計畫考核作業要點」所訂定之8項考評指標(「資料提交管考」、「合約工作量」、「環保署報表」、「委員督導查核及期中(末)審查會議考核」、「人員異動」、「有具體成效或提升滿意度之做法」、「計畫成果宣導效益」、「計畫團隊執行成效及作業配合度」，於97年4月至98年2月執行空污計畫督導考核工作，97年空污管制計畫之考核成績以洗街計畫得分成績87.8最高，其次為營建計畫87.1分第2名、連線計畫87.0分第3名。在會議辦理方面，計完成2場業務執行檢討研商小組會議、4場工作檢討協調會、6場督導考核會議、1場成果檢討會議、出席96-97年空污計畫審查會議、1場98年環保署考評要點講習會、3場專家學者諮詢會議、1場98年度空氣污染防制計畫工作項目協商會議、2場中部空品區交流會議、1場新聞稿講習會議、1場政策專題演講會議、2場聯席會議、1場經驗交流會議、9場次空品區工作協商會議、1場次空氣污染防制計畫審查會議及問卷調查結果說明會，總計辦理35場會議。在96年空氣污染防制計畫追踪檢討，空氣品質目標訂有4項指標，僅PM10之年濃度目標未符合規劃目標。固定源管制目標訂有6項指標，僅1項指標未達目標，為「針對高MIR/VOCS公私場所清查輔導製程改善及新增或提升既有防制措施之家數」達成率為0%，無法明確提出減量。移動源管制目標訂有6項指標，全部達到規劃目標值。逸散源管制目標訂有8項指標，有2項指標未達成目標值，分別為「裸露地揚塵或綠化改善面積」及「縣轄內紙錢集中燃燒噸數」，達成率分別僅64.7%及58.1%。污染物減量目標訂有10項指標，有3項指標未達成目標，分別為「加強非法油品稽查取締作業」、「柴油車老舊車輛汰換-NMHC及CO」、「裸露地提升防制面積」，其餘7項指標之達成率均達100%。在問卷調查之環保施政認知中，最為民眾所知道的施政項目依序包括推動21鄉鎮市提供175站機車免費定檢服務(74.3%, 782人)、提供洗街車(掃街車)進行街道洗掃服務(69.8% 735人)、減少紙錢焚燒並於中元節時提供集中清運至焚化爐焚燒服務(69.2%, 729人)、路邊巡查未定檢機車與通知機車未定檢車主進行定檢之服務(63.7%, 671人)與加油站張貼宣導不得強迫加滿油海報以維縣民健康(56.8%, 598人)，這些施政的項目約有六成以上之縣民，普遍都能感受到環保局對於民眾健康與環境品質維護之用心。

中文關鍵字

空氣,空氣品質,品質,維護,綜合,管理,計畫

類型	檔名	檔案大小	說明	最新版公開日期
期末報告	97年臺中縣空氣品質維護綜合管理計畫正式報告.rar	8MB	[期末報告]公開完整版	2009/9/1 上午 12:00:00

摘要	In 2008, Taichung County won Excellence under assessment by Environmental Protection Agency with total scores of 86.50, a growth of 1.72 scores in 2007. We had 25 air pollution previous programs in 2008 (including subsidy program): 5 programs on control of Stationary sources, 5 programs on control of Mobile sources, 5 programs on control of emission sources, 4 programs on other projects and 6 programs on subsidy. Total budget on air pollution control is NTD199,384,000 and total reduction amount is 6691.5 tons. Air pollution supervision assessment was made from April 2008 to February 2009 under the eight indexes (material submission, amount of contract work, reports of Environmental Protection Agency, supervision/assessment by council members and mid-term (final) examination meeting assessment, changes of personnel, methods with concrete achievements or increasing satisfaction, publicity effects of program achievements, and team execution performance and coordination) of Guidelines Governing Environmental Protection Bureau, Taichung County Air Pollution Control Commissioned Program Assessment. Street cleaning program had the highest scores of 87.8, followed by construction program at 87.1 and connection program at 87.0. We have completed 2 discussion meetings on operation execution, 4 coordination meetings on work, 6 supervision and assessment meetings, 1 achievement discussion meeting, attendance at 2007-2008 air pollution review meeting, 1 study meeting of assessment key points by Environmental Protection Agency, 2009, 3 consultation meetings by experts and scholars, 1 coordination meeting on work in 2009 Air Pollution Control Program, 2 exchange meetings of air quality in central Taiwan, 1 news release study meeting, 1 policy lecture, 2 joint meetings, 1 experience exchange meeting, 9 air quality work coordination meetings, 1 air pollution control program review meeting and questionnaire result symposium. Total number of attended meetings is 35. In the 4 indexes for air quality in 2007 air pollution control program review, only annual concentration of PM10 failed to reach the goal. Only 1 index in the 6 indexes in fixed source control—0% in improvement of process in public/private places with high MIR/VOCS or increase of number of units currently with control measures. We were unable to submit specific reduction amount. We met all target values in the 6 indexes in movable source control. In the 8 indexes of fugitive source control, we failed two indexes—area of exposed land fugitive dust or greening improvement and number of tons of collective burning of paper money within the county. The achievement rate is 64.7% and 58.1% respectively. There are 10 indexes in pollution reduction amount. We failed in three—enhancing inspection of illegal oil products, replacement of old diesel cars—NHMC & CO and larger control area on exposed land. The other 7 indexes are in 100% achievement rate. From the responses in the questionnaires, what the public are most aware of are: providing 175 free motorcycle inspection stations in 21 towns and townships (74.3%, 782persons), cleaning streets with street cleaning vehicles (street sweeping vehicles) (69.8%, 735 persons), reduction of paper money and delivery of collected burnt money on Chungyuan Festival to incinerators (69.2%, 729 persons), tour inspection of motorcycles without regular inspection on the roads and notifying owners of such motorcycles to conduct inspection (63.7%, 671 persons) and posters of publicity on not to have forced full fuel tanks at gas stations to stay healthy (56.8%, 598 persons). Around over 60% of county citizens could feel the care of Environmental Protection Bureau on citizens’ health and environment quality.
英文關鍵字	Air Quality,maintenance,general,management,program

摘要

In 2008, Taichung County won Excellence under assessment by Environmental Protection Agency with total scores of 86.50, a growth of 1.72 scores in 2007. We had 25 air pollution previous programs in 2008 (including subsidy program): 5 programs on control of Stationary sources, 5 programs on control of Mobile sources, 5 programs on control of emission sources, 4 programs on other projects and 6 programs on subsidy. Total budget on air pollution control is NTD199,384,000 and total reduction amount is 6691.5 tons. Air pollution supervision assessment was made from April 2008 to February 2009 under the eight indexes (material submission, amount of contract work, reports of Environmental Protection Agency, supervision/assessment by council members and mid-term (final) examination meeting assessment, changes of personnel, methods with concrete achievements or increasing satisfaction, publicity effects of program achievements, and team execution performance and coordination) of Guidelines Governing Environmental Protection Bureau, Taichung County Air Pollution Control Commissioned Program Assessment. Street cleaning program had the highest scores of 87.8, followed by construction program at 87.1 and connection program at 87.0. We have completed 2 discussion meetings on operation execution, 4 coordination meetings on work, 6 supervision and assessment meetings, 1 achievement discussion meeting, attendance at 2007-2008 air pollution review meeting, 1 study meeting of assessment key points by Environmental Protection Agency, 2009, 3 consultation meetings by experts and scholars, 1 coordination meeting on work in 2009 Air Pollution Control Program, 2 exchange meetings of air quality in central Taiwan, 1 news release study meeting, 1 policy lecture, 2 joint meetings, 1 experience exchange meeting, 9 air quality work coordination meetings, 1 air pollution control program review meeting and questionnaire result symposium. Total number of attended meetings is 35. In the 4 indexes for air quality in 2007 air pollution control program review, only annual concentration of PM10 failed to reach the goal. Only 1 index in the 6 indexes in fixed source control—0% in improvement of process in public/private places with high MIR/VOCS or increase of number of units currently with control measures. We were unable to submit specific reduction amount. We met all target values in the 6 indexes in movable source control. In the 8 indexes of fugitive source control, we failed two indexes—area of exposed land fugitive dust or greening improvement and number of tons of collective burning of paper money within the county. The achievement rate is 64.7% and 58.1% respectively. There are 10 indexes in pollution reduction amount. We failed in three—enhancing inspection of illegal oil products, replacement of old diesel cars—NHMC & CO and larger control area on exposed land. The other 7 indexes are in 100% achievement rate. From the responses in the questionnaires, what the public are most aware of are: providing 175 free motorcycle inspection stations in 21 towns and townships (74.3%, 782persons), cleaning streets with street cleaning vehicles (street sweeping vehicles) (69.8%, 735 persons), reduction of paper money and delivery of collected burnt money on Chungyuan Festival to incinerators (69.2%, 729 persons), tour inspection of motorcycles without regular inspection on the roads and notifying owners of such motorcycles to conduct inspection (63.7%, 671 persons) and posters of publicity on not to have forced full fuel tanks at gas stations to stay healthy (56.8%, 598 persons). Around over 60% of county citizens could feel the care of Environmental Protection Bureau on citizens’ health and environment quality.

英文關鍵字

Air Quality,maintenance,general,management,program