EPA-97-E102-02-104

097

2,000 千元

2008/03/11

2008/12/15

彭衍順

綜計處

賀志殷

嘉南藥理科技大學

科技計畫

永續發展,指標,地方

Sustainable Development, Indicator, Local

王鴻濬,林俊旭

賀志殷

06-2668263

cyho@sun.epa.gov.tw

經建會自民國93年開始補助全國10縣市執行地方永續發展計畫，之後則由環保署持續補助。截至97年底止，全國共有24縣市完成地方永續計畫。本計畫重點掌握國內外地方永續發展制度最新資訊，針對國內既有運作模式提出修正建議，並建立地方縣市永續發展評量制度。研究團隊首先針對各縣市之執行進度及成果做彙整分析，同時參考國外成果地方案例之運作制度，並召開專家學者座談會議，針對既有制度之法律、組織、程序及策略等面相加以修正。針對地方縣市永續發展執行之評量制度，本計畫也參考了國外重要指標，並考量目前可取得之量化統計數據，制度出地方永續發展之共同及特色指標，邀請專家學者討論指標之適用性以及未來評鑑制度之規劃，並初步擬定國內機關執行地方永續發展評鑑之程序。此外，本計畫也召開二場次計畫說明會、十場次之專家學者會議及一場次之縣市模擬會議，協助工作內容之擬定。

永續發展,指標,地方

EPA_97_E103_02_336_.pdf

12MB

[期末報告]公開完整版

2009/3/1 上午 12:00:00

The implementation of local sustainable development project in Taiwan was initialized in 2004 by the Council for Economic Planning and Development (CEPD) through subsidizing 10 cities/counties to carry out the project. In 2005, the Environmental Protection Administration (EPA) became the central competent authority of Local sustainable development and responsible for administering and subsidizing cities and counties in implementation of local sustainable development project. At the end of 2008, a total of 24 out of 25 cities and counties have successfully implemented the project. There are 2 main tasks in this project which includes the evaluation and revision on the implementation mechanism and performances of the local sustainable development projects, and the formulation of the suitable local sustainable development indicators. Regarding the evaluation and revision of the local sustainable development mechanism, the project team surveyed the current status of implementation in the 24 cities and counties and collected 9 case studies of successful implementation of local sustainable development project overseas. 4 sessions of expert consultation meetings were held to examine the existing implementation mechanism with suggested revisions in the areas of legislation, organization, procedure and strategy. Concerning the formulation of assessment indicators for local sustainable development, the project team compared 5 different indicator systems with the annual statistical data published by the Directorate-general of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan and identified 27 quantifiable indicators. 3 sessions of expert consultation meetings were held to examine the feasibility of performance evaluation through the above mentioned indicators. Suggestions were also given on the complete local sustainable development scheme which includes performance indicators (which is subdivided into core and optional indicators), public survey, implementation evaluation and onsite visits. Besides the 10 expert consultation meetings held, the project also organized 2 workshops were organized to explain and discuss the research results with the responsible person from different cities and counties.

Sustainable Development, Indicator, Local