EPA-95-H101-02-221

095

2,460 千元

2006/03/03

2006/12/31

李松宏

廢管處

曾德意

財團法人工業技術研究院

廢棄物管理

一般廢棄物，水肥，妥善處理

General waste, night-soil, appropriate treatment

揚舒閔

03-5732060

shumin@itri.org.tw

本年度(95)本計畫依工作要求完成相關工作成果，簡要說明如下： 1.針對有處理設施之5個縣市台北市、新竹市、台中市、台南市及高雄市進行問卷調查作業，期望藉由問卷資料分析取得較可靠的清除量資料。 2.本計畫推動至今，各水肥清除業者（許可項目D-0104水肥或糞尿等廢棄物）由682家成長至770家，共增加88家；甲級略減1 家，而乙級由411家成長至445家，共增加34家；丙級由231家成長至286家，共增加55家。 3.本計畫今年度共現勘了11處水肥（替代）處理設施，包含5處既有水肥廠(含投入站) ：台北市迪化水肥投入站、新竹市水肥處理廠、台中市水肥處理廠、台南市水肥處理廠、高雄市水肥處理廠；2處營運中替代設施：基隆市天外天掩埋場水肥轉運站、彰濱工業區污水處理廠；3處近期內可使用之替代設施：湖口工業區污水處理廠、台南縣安定滲出水處理廠、宜蘭縣壯圍污水處理廠水肥投入站；1處評估中設施：台中縣大里工業區污水處理廠。 4.國內僅有既有之5座水肥處理廠，經過一年的努力持續宣導推動的結果，本年度新增處理設施包括3座污水處理廠水肥投入站（宜蘭縣壯圍、桃園縣林口南區、大樹下水道污水廠)，6座工業區污水處理廠投入站（新竹縣湖口、台中縣大里、彰化縣彰濱工業區線西污水廠、芳苑工業區污水廠、高雄縣仁武、大社工業區污水廠），3座滲出水處理廠水肥處理設施（嘉義縣水上鹿草、台南縣安定、屏東縣大寮)及台中市擴建水肥投入站，明顯各縣市已針對水肥處理設施積極爭取設置。 5.為解決水肥處理設施不足、清運路線遠與清除處理成本高的問題，可於農業縣或偏遠鄉鎮的既有掩埋場補助設置符合法規要求的水肥加熱、腐熟與消毒設備，水肥經處理後可提供作為農地再利用用途。 6.建置「全國各縣市水肥妥善清理推動計畫管考系統」，各縣市提報計畫內容與工作事項規劃進度，並由承辦人員每季填報執行成果，藉以追蹤各縣市水肥清理推動計畫之執行進度，並建立環境地理資訊系統，提供各縣市替代設施相關資料參考。 7.於台北縣、基隆市、新竹縣、彰化縣及台南縣分別舉辦4場次教育宣導說明會，落實水肥清運業者正確清理觀念。 8.於南區環保科技園區辦理1場次成效檢討會，邀請各縣市分享水肥妥善清理推動經驗。

一般廢棄物，水肥，妥善處理

KM-99977748-1.pdf

9MB

[期末報告]公開完整版

2007/3/1 上午 12:00:00

The work items completed for this project in this year (2006) are briefly summarized as followings: 1.Surveys have been conducted in regions having treatment facilities including Taipei City, Hsinchu City, Tainan City and Kaohsiung City. The purpose of the survey is to obtain more reliable information about the treatment capacity from analyzing the data collected. 2.Since the implementation of this project, the total human waste treatment/cleaning companies (approved item: D-104 for human waste) have increased from 682 to 770 that is an addition of 88 companies. Among those, the number of class A companies have reduced to one less, the number of class B companies have changed from 411 to 445 (an addition of 34 companies), and class C companies have changed from 231 to 286 (an addition of 55 companies). 3.We have inspected 11 human waste (substitute) treatment facilities including 5 existing human waste disposal companies (including dumping stations). They are Dihua Taipei human waste dumping station, Hsinchu City human waste treatment facility, Taichung City human waste treatment facility, Tainan City human waste treatment facility, Kaohsiung City human waste treatment facility, 2 operating substitution facilities (Keelung City disposal site human waste transfer post, Chuanghua Industrial Park waste water treatment facility), 3 under-testing substitution facilities (Hukou Industrial Park waste water treatment facility, Anding of Tainan County leach-out water treatment facility, Chuang-Wei of Yilan County waste water treatment facility & human waste dumping station), and 1 under-evaluating facility (Dali Industrial Park Taichung County waste water treatment facility). 4.There are only 5 human waste treatment facilities in Taiwan. However, after one year of endeavor and continuous promotion, many new facilities have been built for operation which include 3 human waste dumping stations & treatment facilities (Chuang-Wei Yilan County, Southern District Lincou in Taoyuan County, Dashu Sewage treatment facility), 6 industrial waste water dumping stations & treatment facilities (Hukou of Hsinchu County, Dali of Taichung County, Hsienhsi Industrial Park in Changhua County waste water treatment facility, Fangyuan Industrial Park waste water treatment facility, Jenwu of Kaohsiung County, Tashe Industrial Park waste water treatment), 3 leach-out water & human waste treatment facilities (Lutsau Shueishang of Chiayi County, Anding of Tainan County, Daliau of Pingtung County), Taichung City expanded human waste dumping station. It is obvious that counties or cities nationwide are striving to build more human waste treatment facilities. 5.In order to solve the problem of insufficient human waste treatment facility, remote cleaning route, and high treatment cost, facilities that comply with the regulations for human waste heating, putrescence, and sterilization can be set up at the existing disposal site in agricultural counties or far-located towns. The treated human waste can be re-applied for agricultural usage. 6.An auditing system for managing the human waste treatment promotion projects from counties and cities nationwide has been set up. The proposal suggested by each county or city contains project content, work items and schedule planning. The achievements for the project are reviewed and recorded each quarter in order to keep on track the progress. In addition, environmental and geological information systems have been set up as the references for substitution facilities in other counties or cities. 7.Four promotional campaigns have been held in Taipei County, Keelung City, Hsinchu County, Changhua County, and Tainan County, respectively to educate the human waste treatment companies and give them correct concept about human waste treatment. 8.A performance review was held at the Environmental Science & Technology Park in Southern Taiwan to invite participants from every county and city to share their experiences in promoting human waste treatment and disposal.

General waste, night-soil, appropriate treatment