環境資源報告成果查詢系統

廢輪胎、廢鉛蓄電池回收體系分級補貼前置規劃暨回收率計算檢討計畫

中文摘要 本計畫主要研究目的乃進行廢輪胎及廢鉛蓄電池回收體系分級補貼前置規劃與檢討回收率計算公式。為了有效達成本計畫研究目標之需求,根據計畫目標及主要項目,本研究分下列三部分:(一)廢輪胎回收體系分級補貼前置規劃作業,主要工作重點為進行廢輪胎處理業廠區檢測與輔導作業、研提廢輪胎處理業分級補貼制度規劃以及開發廢輪胎再利用創新實驗產品;(二)廢鉛蓄電池回收體系分級補貼前置規劃作業,主要工作重點為廢鉛蓄電池處理業廠區檢測作業、研提廢鉛蓄電池處理業分級補貼制度規劃以及分析廢鉛蓄電池處理後產生之有害廢棄物與廢酸液處理技術與方式;(三)重新檢討廢輪胎及廢鉛蓄電池之回收率計算公式,主要為實地調查廢輪胎與廢鉛蓄電池使用年限與重量參數,並檢討現行計算公式是否需要調整修正。 根據作業環境檢測與輔導作業結果顯示,目前國內部分廢輪胎處理業在廠區作業環境之污染防制措施仍有待改善,國內廢鉛蓄電池處理業之污染防制措施則已有良好成效;廢輪胎處理業之現場輔導作業亦有效協助業者提昇廠區營運績效與改善作業環境品質。此外,本研究開發之再利用創新產品-「喇叭狀橡膠吸音板」屬於對環境友善之綠色建材,具有良好吸音效果,有助於擴展國內廢輪胎再利用產品市場通路。 目前廢鉛蓄電池處理後產生之有害廢棄物包括電解酸液、爐渣與集塵灰。國際間處理爐渣與集塵灰之方式主要為固化處理,亞洲地區國家多將電解酸液進行中和處理後放流,歐美國家則擁有電解酸液回收純化為酸洗液或電解液之技術。廢電解酸液作為酸洗液再利用則為目前國內廢鉛蓄電池處理業之短期發展目標。 本文研提之廢輪胎分級補貼制度乃採取鼓勵制,配合輔導作業指標分為A、B、C三個等級,A級門檻為最高,但費率亦可提昇至3.8~4.5元/公斤;廢鉛蓄電池分級補貼制度亦採取鼓勵制,搭配輔導作業指標分為A、B、C三個等級,A級門檻為最高,費率亦可提昇至5.33~7.83元/公斤。 經實地調查發現,廢輪胎內徑15~19吋輪胎較過去減少了約44%之重量,根據計算在使用年限為3年之狀況下,98年廢輪胎回收率可達到85%(既有回收率計算公式結果為68.84%);而廢鉛蓄電池在使用年限為4年之狀況下回收率可達到44%(既有回收率計算公式結果為37.04%),顯示有必要修訂目前使用之計算公式。
中文關鍵字 廢輪胎、廢鉛蓄電池、分級補貼費率

基本資訊

專案計畫編號 EPA-99-HA14-03-A113 經費年度 099 計畫經費 3530 千元
專案開始日期 2010/04/22 專案結束日期 2010/12/31 專案主持人 張添晉
主辦單位 回收基管會 承辦人 鄭安利 執行單位 國立臺北科技大學

成果下載

類型 檔名 檔案大小 說明
期末報告 EPA-99-HA14-03-A113(公開版).pdf 6MB

A pre-planning of classified rating subsidies system and recycling rate evaluation to recycle system

英文摘要 The objective of this project was pre-planning the classified subsidy system and reviewing the recovery formula for waste tire and waste lead-acid battery. In order to achieve requirement that contained the following aspects: (1) execute to analysis and counseling operation for treatment plant of the waste tire then established classified subsidy system, and developed innovative product of waste tire recycling; (2) execute to counsel for treatment plant of the waste lead-acid battery then established classified subsidy system, and hazardous waste and waste acid analysis which produced from process waste lead acid batteries; (3) investigated the waste tire and waste lead-acid battery useful life and weight parameters, and then reviewed the recycling rate formula. On the basis of the result from analysis and counseling operation, currently the waste tire treatment plant of the pollution control measure should be improved, and the waste lead-acid battery treatment plant of the pollution control measure had good result. The counseling operation of the waste tire treatment plant assisted to enhance the operating performance effectively and improved the quality of operating environment. The innovative product of waste tire recycling from this project “rubber sound-absorbing panel” had sound efficiency well which assisted to expand the waste tire recycling market in Taiwan. The hazardous wastes of the waste lead-acid batteries treatment included waste electrolytic acid, slag and dust. The method of slag and dust treatment was solidification in chief. Waste electrolytic acid was treated by pH Neutralization process in Asia, and recycled and purified for picking liquor or electrolyte in European and American. Picking liquor or electrolyte had become the short-term goals for recycling of waste lead acid batteries in Taiwan. The differential subsidy adopted incentive system and it divided into A, B, C grades by the results of the counseling operation for waste tire. The A-level is the most difficult goal to achieve and its fee rate could increase to NT$ 3.8 ~ 4.5 per kilogram. The differential subsidy for waste lead-acid battery also divided into A, B, C grades, and its fee rate could increase to NT$5.33~7.83 per kilogram. According to the results of survey, the weight of 15~19 inch diameter tires decreased about 44%. The calculation of the recycling rate in 2009 for waste tires could achieve 85% by using the conditions of useful life for 3 years. The recycling rate for waste lead acid batteries achieved 44% by using the life conditions for 4 years. It means that it is necessary to revise the existing recycling rate formula.
英文關鍵字 waste tire, waste lead-acid battery, classified subsidy rate