環境資源報告成果查詢系統

斷層帶上設置掩埋場之可行性評估計畫

中文摘要 斷層為岩層中的破裂面兩側發生相對運動之地質構造,通常不利於工程施工,其中活動斷層更具備潛在的地震威脅,一般而言重大工程如水庫、核電廠等皆會進行較完整的地質調查並對選址有所規範,然而目前我國法規對掩埋場的選址並無明確之規範,掩埋場雖不若建築物遭受破壞時可能產生重大之生命財產的損失,但卻可能引致更長遠的環境污染問題,所以實有必要研究斷層對掩埋場設置的影響,茲以訂立較完善的法規。本計畫執行方式包括召開專家研商會議,邀請地質、大地工程、環境工程、地下水文之專家共同討論,再蒐集國內外法規、文獻、案例等資料進行研究,對國內案例進行實地勘查紀錄,最後提出法規修改的建議條文。 研究結果顯示國內外的建築或土地管理法規,大多對活動斷層採取非常謹慎的態度,或者將活動斷層列入限制發展的區域,或者明確地規定其退縮距離。美國聯邦法40 CFR Part 258規定一般廢棄物掩埋場不可位於全新世曾活動過的斷層60公尺以內,澳洲昆士蘭政府規定較嚴格為100公尺。專家研商會議的結論亦建議掩埋場對活動斷層宜採退縮的方式,且有害廢棄物掩埋場應需要更大的退縮距離。案例探討的結果顯示活動斷層錯動本身及其引致的地震,都會對掩埋場設施產生若干程度的影響及損害。本計畫最後依據專家會議的討論結果及案例探討與法規文獻之研究,建議環保署自行修訂其所主管之廢棄物處理法規較為合適,在活動斷層方面,建議採用衛生掩埋法處理之掩埋場可訂立50至60公尺的退縮距離,而採用封閉掩埋場處理之掩埋場可訂立60至100公尺的退縮距離,活動斷層之定義及分布,建議以中央地質調查主管機關所公布者為依據;在非活動斷層方面,建議以採取工程措施的方式,解決潛在之地質問題及預防可能之污染洩漏。
中文關鍵字 掩埋場,斷層,地震

基本資訊

專案計畫編號 EPA-99-H102-02-232 經費年度 099 計畫經費 920 千元
專案開始日期 2010/09/16 專案結束日期 2011/06/30 專案主持人 高思懷
主辦單位 廢管處 承辦人 李易書 執行單位 中華民國環境工程學會

成果下載

類型 檔名 檔案大小 說明
期末報告 EPA-99-H102-02-232.pdf 14MB

The feasibility study of landfill site located within the fault zone

英文摘要 A fault is a fracture along which the blocks of crust on either side have moved relative to one another parallel to the fracture. It is usually detrimental to the process of engineering construction. Furthermore, an active fault has the potential to cause earthquake. In general, there are more complete geological investigation and site restriction requirements for important engineering structures, such as reservoir and nuclear power plant. However, the current law has not clear stipulation for site selection criteria of landfill. Although landfill is not like building that may cause damage to life when it is destroyed, the dirty or toxic materials leaked from landfill could pollute the environments. It is necessary to evaluate the influence of fault on the landfill site to serve the information for proper revision of current laws. In this research, an expert conference is organized. Some specialists in geology, geotechnical engineering, environmental engineering, and hydrology were invited to discuss on these topics. Both of the internal and external laws, standards, researches and cases were surveyed in this study. In addition, the performances of four landfills in Taiwan during past earthquakes are investigated. Finally, some suggestions for amendment of article are proposed in this report. This study shows that the influences of active fault are considered seriously for most managed laws of building or land. The site around the active fault is usually specified as a restricted development area, or a setback distance is stipulated. US federal law of 40 CFR part 258 required that new municipal solid waste landfill units and lateral expansions shall not be located within 60 meters of a fault that has had displacement in Holocene time. The Queensland government of Australia required 100 meters of setback distance for Holocene active fault. The similar setback requirement was also obtained from the conclusion of expert conference. The specialists suggested that the farther setback distance was needed for toxic solid waste landfill. Case studies of four landfills showed that both earthquake-induced surface ruptures and displacements by fault-slip could cause some damages to facilities of landfill. According to the results of expert conference discussion, case studies and investigations of laws and standards, this report suggests that it is properly for EPA to revise its administrant law. On the aspect of active fault, a setback distance ranging from 50 to 60 meters for sanitary landfill, 60 to 100 meters for security landfill is proposed. On the aspect of non-active fault, it needs not the setback distance, whereas the engineering measures should be adopted to overcome the potential geological problems and to prevent leakage and pollution of underground waters.
英文關鍵字 Landfill, fault, earthquake