英文摘要 |
In order to keep the public nuisance dispute information management system up-to-date and prevent the occurrence of public nuisance disputes according to the results of the history case analysis, this project completed several work items as follow: (1) analyzed ten domestic cases—evaluated reasons of successful and failure compensations; (2) established the technical advisory group for public nuisance identification and evidence—some members of a 78-expert group were sent out twice according to requirements of EPA to collect pollution samples and then provide advice to the environmental agency regarding pollution incidents; (3) collected and input into the system a member list of a 74 expert advisory committee, a mediation committee for each city and county (besides Lienchiang County), and an EPA adjudication board; (4) completed initial structure and draft of standard operation procedures of the public nuisance evidence collecting process, held three expert revision meetings, and completed revised version according to the suggestions from the meetings; (5) provided assistance to the EPA in holding a keynote speech, which 42 EPA staffs participated in; (6) held regional seminar in Yunlin County and Kuohsiung City; (7) updated and maintained the public nuisance dispute information management system—developed case-management related functions; (8) held the public nuisance disputes and identification conference, which 86 EPA and EPB staffs participated in; and (9) held 2011 work review meetings on national public nuisance disputes, which 65 EPA and EPB staffs participated in.
|