環境資源報告成果查詢系統

細懸浮微粒(PM2.5)質量濃度與成分人工採樣分析先驅計畫

中文摘要 本計畫目標為辦理細懸浮微粒(PM2.5)質量濃度及成分監測、查核PM2.5成分自動連續監測儀器、引進PM2.5有關監測技術。在完成63次實場量測,本計畫比較手動採樣和八個空品站PM2.5質量濃度,質量濃度變化相當一致,但自動監測濃度較高。八個空品站自動監測濃度和R&P 2000 PM2.5質量濃度全部數據的相關性(R2)都可達到0.86以上, R&P 2000 PM2.5質量濃度和自動監測濃度比值全數據平均從0.57到0.89,總平均為0.76。三個成分測站R&P 2300和自動監測PM2.5質量濃度比值全數據平均從0.87到0.92,總平均為0.90,但同一個測站在不同季節仍各有差異。大多數空品站PM2.5濃度春季最高,夏季最低。三個成分測站PM2.5最主要成分在春、秋季都是SO42-,夏季多以有機碳濃度最高,NO3-在各季濃度變化,以春季濃度最高,但揮發NO3-濃度比例最低,夏季及秋季則是原NO3-濃度低但揮發濃度比例高。探討R&P 2000 FRM 與R&P 2300兩部手動採樣器的差異,結果顯示R&P 2300採樣器裝設蜂巢管及濾紙匣,是導致目前在成分測站PM2.5檢測濃度高於R&P 2000 FRM檢測濃度的原因。三個成分測站揮發的NO3-濃度和原始NO3-濃度比值在環境最高溫度較低時,揮發比值較低,隨著環境最高溫度上升揮發比值迅速增加,但兩者在相同最高溫度時並無相同揮發比值且變動很大。修正揮發成分後PM2.5佔原始PM2.5全數據比例約增加10%,雖然修正比例不高,但從管制污染源的角度來看,對於微粒化學成分前驅物排放源管制成效評估還是要回歸到環境微粒各自成分濃度,因此,正確評估微粒化學成分在大氣狀態存在濃度,當然有其必要。針對空品站與R&P 2300手動採樣器PM2.5的差異,本計畫發現與微粒含水量有弱相關。整體而言,本計畫對於微粒質量濃度量測、PM2.5水溶性離子分析、PM2.5碳成分分析品保品管作業,都獲得滿意的成果。 本年度環保署進行成分測站搬遷與整併,已逐漸將原超級測站系統監測儀器,與一般空品測站合併,僅高雄市輔英站保留原超級測站系統核心站的大部份儀器,各種微粒成分監測儀器資料可用率平均,最佳為氣膠散光儀的95.5%,其次為黑碳吸光儀的92.1%;各測站普遍都有的Sunset 5040碳成分分析儀在各測站資料可用率從70.6%至92.9%,以輔英站的資料可用率最高。 在引進PM2.5有關監測技術,建立監測技術規範上,本計畫彙整資訊包括:美國FRM採樣器比較、2011年5月美國環保署比較FRM與FEM儀器平均誤差、美國FRM與FEM儀器比較評估、2011年10月12日美國環保署公告的PM2.5 FRM和FEM認證儀器、2012年2月22日美國環保署發出的FRM和FEM監測儀數據比較方法、美國PM2.5化學成分觀測網、WMO氣膠黑碳成分對環境變遷的影響、歐洲CARBOTRAF計畫量測交通排放黑碳和CO2。此外,本計畫也編寫PM2.5監測規範、修改數據品保操作手冊、評估PM2.5採樣分析技術在台灣適用性、建議未來PM2.5採樣地點等最新資訊。在環保署公布PM2.5空品標準以後,本計畫建議美國通過PM2.5 FRM認證方法都可以使用、訂出PM2.5監測儀和PM2.5 FRM檢測值的可接受規範、規劃建置我國PM2.5化學成分監測網、在南、北部地區設置主要微粒成分監測站。
中文關鍵字 細懸浮微粒,微粒成分測站品保查核,細懸浮微粒監測技術

基本資訊

專案計畫編號 EPA-100-FA11-03-A088 經費年度 100 計畫經費 14040 千元
專案開始日期 2011/02/09 專案結束日期 2012/03/31 專案主持人 李崇德
主辦單位 監資處 承辦人 陳妙玲 執行單位 國立中央大學環境工程研究所

成果下載

類型 檔名 檔案大小 說明
期末報告 EPA-100-FA11-03-A088.pdf 27MB

Pioneer Project of Fine Particulate (PM2.5) Mass and Speciation Analysis by Manual Collection

英文摘要 The goals of this project are to measure fine particulate matter (PM2.5) mass and composition, audit the performance of PM2.5 speciation monitoring instruments, and introduce PM2.5 related monitoring technology from leading countries. After completing 63 batches of PM2.5 field measurements, this study compares manual collection with continuous monitoring at the eight air quality monitoring stations (AQS). The mass concentration varies quite consistently but continuous monitoring reads higher. The linear regression correlation coefficients (R2) of PM2.5 mass concentration between continuous monitoring and manual collection of R&P 2000 Federal Reference Method (FRM) reached above 0.86 for all data at the eight AQS. The ratios of PM2.5 mass concentration for R&P 2000 FRM over continuous monitoring ranged from 0.57 to 0.89 with an average of 0.76 for all data at the eight AQS. In addition, the ratios of PM2.5 mass concentration for R&P 2300 speciation sampler over continuous monitoring ranged from 0.87 to 0.92 with an average of 0.90 for all data at the three speciation AQS. For most monitoring stations, seasonal variations were obvious; PM2.5 concentration was highest in spring and lowest in summer. The predominant PM2.5 species was SO42- in spring and fall, while the major PM2.5 species in summer was organic carbon. The concentration of NO3- was highest in spring but with lowest ratio for volatilized NO3- over original NO3-. The trend was reversed for NO3- in summer and fall. For the study of the deviation between R&P 2300 speciation sampler and R&P 2000 FRM, the results show that the installed honeycomb denuders and filter package in R&P 2300 accounted for the deviation between the two samplers. The ratio of the volatilized NO3- to the original NO3- at the three speciation stations was low when the maximum ambient temperature is low; however, the ratio was increased rapidly with the increasing maximum ambient temperature. Nonetheless, the aforementioned ratio varied greatly with the same maximum ambient temperature. The ratio of corrected PM2.5 to original PM2.5 increased about 10% for all data. Although the corrected mass ratio is not great, from pollution source control viewpoint, the assessment of control efficiency for sources emitting precursors of particulate chemical components still needs to be traced back to their ambient particulate component concentrations. Therefore, accurate measurement on particulate component concentration is certainly necessary. For the deviation of PM2.5 concentration between R&P 2300 and the continuous monitoring, this project finds that particle water content has a weak correlation with the deviation. Overall, this project achieved satisfied results for the quality control and quality assurance (QC/QA) of the measurements in PM2.5 mass, water-soluble ions, and carbonaceous content. This year, the instruments in PM2.5 speciation monitoring stations were merged into ordinary air quality monitoring stations. Only Fu-Yin station keeps the instruments of the original core supersite in operation. For data availability of all speciation monitoring instruments, the best is aerosol light-scattering spectrometer with an average of 95.5%. It is followed by Aethalometer with an average of 92.1% for data availability. The data availability for common instrument such as Sunset 5040 carbon analyzer ranged from 70.6 % to 92.9% with Fu-Yin station stays the best in all stations. For the aspect of introducing PM2.5 related monitoring technology and the setup of monitoring technology norms, information such as performance comparison among the U.S. FRM, average deviation of FEM from FRM by the U.S. EPA in May 2011, the comparison of the U.S. FRM and FEM, certified PM2.5 FRM and FEM promulgated by the U.S. EPA on 12 October 2011, side by side FRM and FEM data comparison issued from the U.S. EPA on 22 February 2012, introduction of the U.S. Chemical Speciation Network, the impact of aerosol carbonaceous content on environmental change, European CARBOTRAF on the measurements of black carbon and CO2 from vehicle emissions were all compiled. As a companion work, this project completed PM2.5 manual measuring norm, modified data QC/QA operation manual, evaluated the applicability of PM2.5 manual measurement in Taiwan, and suggested future PM2.5 manual measurement sites in Taiwan. Given the promulgation of PM2.5 air quality standard by the Taiwan EPA, this project suggests allowing the application of all U.S. PM2.5 FRM to Taiwan, establishing an acceptable norm between PM2.5 continuous monitors and FRM, planning the setup of Taiwan PM2.5 chemical speciation network, and establishing two major speciation monitoring stations in the southern and northern Taiwan.
英文關鍵字 Fine particulate monitoring; Quality assurance audit on speciation monitoring site; Fine particulate monitoring technology