環境資源報告成果查詢系統

101年彰化縣養豬業源頭減量清潔養 豬(豬廁所)示範推廣計畫

中文摘要 傳統養豬畜牧管理方式係利用大量清水沖洗豬舍,不僅浪費水資源,且難符合「省水減污」源頭減量之環保要求,而產生高濃度有機物廢水更嚴重污染河川環境;另產生有機物廢水雖已設置三段式廢水處理設備處理,惟需24 hr曝氣處理故耗能,不符「節能」環保趨勢;又沖洗豬舍將含高有機物有回收再利用價值的豬糞,溶解於廢水中處理後排放,也不符國際「資源循環」環保精神。 有鑑於此,彰化縣環境保護局為符合環保趨勢潮流,打造畜牧業永續發展,並兼顧環保,故規劃辦理「101年彰化縣養豬業源頭減量清潔養豬(豬廁所)示範推廣計畫」(以下簡稱本計畫),配合宣導推廣養豬場之飼養觀念改善,逐步行動改變畜產管理,以降低畜牧場之環境污染,及提高資源再利用可行性;針對本計畫各項目之執行摘要說明如后。 一、篩選養豬場示範戶設置簡易型排糞架(豬廁所) (一) 彙整分析舊濁水溪尚未設置豬廁所之養豬場,並依據前示範計畫研訂之篩選原則(如附件一),篩選具有推廣設置效益較佳者(優先針對鹿島橋上游,第二優先針對鹿島橋下游,如未有適宜對象再擴及本縣其他流域),協助至少完成篩選25場示範養豬戶設置2,500個簡易型排糞架。本計畫已於101.08.16全數完成25家示範戶2,500座簡易型排糞架安裝作業,詳細辦理情形請參見CH2章節內容。 (二) 針對前述篩選具有推廣設置效益較佳之養豬戶,辦理乙場次設置意願諮詢會,並配合現場實地調查作業,完成至少25場示範養豬戶設置2,500個簡易型排糞架。本計畫已於101.05.10上、下午各辦理一場次意願諮詢會議,詳細辦理情形及簡易型排糞架設置、實際使用情形,請參見CH2章節內容。 (三) 前述調查作業應調查適合設置豬廁所之豬舍欄舍數量,並決定示範養豬戶預計設置豬廁所數量及分配表。本計畫依據調查結果決定25家示範養豬戶2,500座簡易型排糞架之數量分配表,請參見CH2章節內容。 二、輔導示範養豬場配合豬廁所設置採取清潔養豬畜產管理方式,並追蹤調查各管理面向效益 (一) 實地教育輔導示範養豬場之豬農應配合清潔養豬(豬廁所)畜產管理方式(依據前示範計畫建立「清潔養豬生產管理之最佳化標準作業流程」,如附件二),計畫期間至少各完成5次輔導,以建立配合豬廁所設置之使用管理認知,並持續輔導設置豬廁所後之清潔養豬畜產管理方式。本計畫於排糞架安裝作業完成後即刻開始辦理各示範戶之輔導作業,調查內容包含「用水量、使用人力、清洗時間、豬隻飼養密度、育成率(或存活率)、固形物增量」等項目,依現場實地教育輔導之結果分析,設置豬廁所後之用水量可減少約62.04%、使用人力約可節省31.7%、清洗時間約可節省28.3%、育成率平均約提高10%、固形物約可增加42.4%、臭味(NH3)約可改善51.5%、畜舍環境可改善為乾爽,相關調查統計資料詳如CH3、CH4章節內容。 (二) 前述實地教育輔導時,同步追蹤調查豬廁所設置完成後各項成效分析,至少應包括畜產管理效益分析(用水量、清洗時間、使用人力、育成率(或存活率)、固形物增量)、環境改善效益分析(畜舍臭味、畜舍環境)及污染削減效益分析(主流測站、支流排水),目前本計畫已完成設置前之用水量、使用人力、清洗時間、豬隻飼養密度、育成率(或存活率)、固形物增量調查作業,相關調查統計資料詳如CH3、CH4章節內容。 (三) 前述污染削減效益分析作業依下列方式辦理: 1.水質檢測地點:主流測站(至少4站)、支流排水(至少4條)。 2.水質檢測項目:流量、BOD、SS、DO、NH3-N。 3.檢測頻率:至少完成3次。 本計畫為探討豬廁所設置後,污染負荷降低程度對河川水質的影響,因此測站選定原則先以豬廁所設置數量較為密集之排水為優先,本計畫已完成3次主流測站及支流排水採樣作業,第3次水質採樣作業於101.11.5完成,目前水質檢測中,在舊濁水溪的主流部份,鹿島橋9月份檢測結果與6月份相比,雖然仍為嚴重污染,但污染程度RPI值由7.25降至6.25,溪湖橋9月份檢測結果,由6月份之嚴重污染降至中度污染(RPI值為3.75);而在支流部份,9月份在八堡二圳內三排水及海豐崙排水檢測結果較6月份嚴重,其RPI指標皆已達嚴重污染程度,第3次河川採樣結果水質檢測中。 在鹿港溪主流部份,油車橋9月份檢測結果與6月份相同,皆為嚴重污染,萬豐橋9月份檢測結果較6月份嚴重,污染程度由中度污染提升至嚴重污染;在支流部份,9月份在陳厝厝排水及八堡二圳東溝排水之檢測結果較6月份嚴重,其RPI指標皆已達嚴重污染程度,第3次河川採樣結果水質檢測中。第1及第2次水質分析詳如CH4章節內容。 三、輔導示範養豬戶改善三段式廢水處理設施 (一) 實地教育輔導各示範養豬場之三段式廢水處理設施調整操作維護情形(包含固液分離設施、厭氧處理單元及好氧處理單元(含終沉池)),計畫期間至少各完成5次輔導,提高廢水處理成效。 本計畫目前已針對25場示範戶之處理單元於豬廁所設置前完成5次實地教育輔導作業,每次進行輔導時,除現場告知業者缺失改善建議之外,並將缺失改善建議以紙本內容交予業者並現場進行溝通協調,以期達最佳之輔導成效,相關水質檢測結果統計分析詳如CH5章節內容。 (二) 針對示範養豬戶分析其設置前後至少完成3次三段式廢水處理設施各處理單元處理效率改善情形(至少包含原廢水、固液分離池、厭氣池、終沉池出流水之水質檢測,檢測項目至少包含NH3-N、SS、BOD及COD)。 配合示範戶之處理單元輔導作業,目前已完成25場示範戶之處理單元各3次採樣作業,第3次採樣水質檢測中,配合所取得之水質數據進行分析,有效釐清各場之處理單元現況並適切給予缺失改善建議,相關分析內容詳如CH5章節內容。 四、辦理至少1場次豬廁所成效推廣發表會,並提供宣導品至少300份。 本計畫之豬廁所成效推廣發表會已於12月12日完成辦理,會中邀請舊濁水溪流域及員林大排(鹿港溪)流域之養豬業共計256家,共出席188家,出席率為73%。並表揚100年示範計畫及本年度示範戶推廣成效較佳之業者,藉由成效發表會的辦理,以求成功拋磚引玉,吸引更多農友加入推動清潔養豬畜產管理的行列。 五、配合環保署推動政策定期彙整全國各縣市豬廁所推動執行成效 本計畫目前已完成101年3~10月資料彙整作業,目前從未回報之縣市包含南投縣及雲林縣,101年10月尚未回報之縣市包含新竹縣、南投縣、雲林縣及高雄市,本計畫目前已完成全國101年3~10月份已提報之資料彙整作業並提交環保局呈現環保署,相關調查統計資料詳如CH6章節內容。
中文關鍵字 源頭減量;清潔養豬;豬廁所

基本資訊

專案計畫編號 經費年度 101 計畫經費 7611.110 千元
專案開始日期 2012/04/17 專案結束日期 2012/12/15 專案主持人 黃俊雄
主辦單位 彰化縣環境保護局 承辦人 陳仕穎 執行單位 台灣曼寧工程顧問股份有限公司

成果下載

類型 檔名 檔案大小 說明
期末報告 101豬廁所計畫成果報告書中英文摘要.pdf 0MB

The 2012 Changhua County Pig Farming Industry Source Reduction and Clean Pig Farming (Pig Toilet) demonstration and promotion Plan

英文摘要 The traditional pig farming administration involve flushing the pigsty with massive amount of water, which is not only a waste of water resources but also very difficult to comply with the “Saving Water and Reducing Pollution”, environmental requirement of source reduction. In addition, the generated high concentration organic waste water can further pollute our river environment. Although the high concentration waste water has been processed by the three step waste water treatment equipment but the 24 hours aeration process consumes so much energy, which also makes it hard to comply with the environmental trend of “energy conservation”. Again, the organic-rich waste water from pigsty flushing is recyclable and by dissolving it in the waste water is also a contradiction with the international environmental protection spirit of “Recycling Resource”. With the above in mind, in order to comply with the international trend of environmental protection, create lasting developments for the stock breeding industry, and taking into account of environmental protection, Environmental Protection Bureau of Changhua County had devised the “The 2012 Changhua County Pig Farming Industry Source Reduction and Clean Pig Farming (Pig Toilet) demonstration and promotion Plan” (herein refer to as the “plan”) to cut down the pollution caused by stock breeding and increase the applicability of resource recycling through promotion of improved breeding concept in pig farming and step by step modification of stock breeding administration. The execution abstracts of various items in the plan are explained as followed. 1. Selection of pig farming demonstration farmers and set up simple manure holders (pig toilet) (1) Collect and analyze pig farmers who yet to have pig toilet along the Old Zhuoshuixi River and select farmers with the most promotional potential (first target the upstream of Ludau Bridge, then the downstream of Ludau Bridge, and lastly expand to other alternative drainage areas if there are no suitable subjects) base on selection method derived from previous demonstration plan (attachment 1). Assisted in selecting 25 demonstration pig farmers for installation of 2500 simple manure holders. The plan had until August 16th of 2012, completed all installation of 2500 manure holders for 25 demonstration pig farmers; please refer to Chapter 2 for operation details. (2) Targeting the above selected pig farmers with promotional potentials, one aspiration consultation meeting was held and on-site investigations had been conducted, completing at least 2500 simple manure holders for 25 demonstration pig farmers. The plan had held two aspiration consultation meetings in the morning and afternoon on May 10th, 2012 respectively. Please refer to Chapter 2 for detailed information on meeting, installation, and actual usage of manure holders. (3) The above investigation should look into numbers of pigsties suited for installing pig toilet, decide on numbers of pig toilets that pig farmers planned to have, and established the work allocation table. Base on the investigation results, the plan determined the quantity allocation table for 2500 simple manure holders to be installed at 25 demonstration pig farmers. Please refer to chapter 2 for operation details. 2. Assist demonstration pig farmers for setting up clean pig farming administration in conjunction with the installation of pig toilet, and trace and investigate effects for every administrative aspects (1) On-site training and counseling to demonstration pig farmers for following the clean pig farming administration practices (base on the optimized clean pig farming administration standard operation procedure from previous demonstration plan, attachment 2). During the execution period, in coordination with the installation of pig toilet, at least five counseling sessions were completed for establishing administrative cognition and for continuous counseling for clean pig farming administrative practices after the toilet was installed. The plan immediately started the demonstration farmers’ counseling operation after the manure holders were installed. The content of investigation included items like “water usage, labor, flushing hours, pig breeding density, successful breeding rate (survival rate), solid content increase, and so forth”. Based on results from on-site education and counseling, after installation of pig toilet, the water usage was decreased by approximately 62.04%, labor saved by 31.7%, flushing time saved by 28.3%, successful breeding on average enhanced by 10%, solid content increased about 42.4%, odor (NH3) improved by 51.5%, and the environment of pigsty also became drier. For relative investigation and statistics, please refer to Chapter 3 and 4 for more detail. (2) During the above on-site training and counseling, tracing and investigation of different performance items’ analysis after installing pig toilet was simultaneously conducted. At the least, it should include the stock breeding administrative effects analysis (water usage, flushing hours, labor, successful breeding rate (survival rate), and solid content increase), environmental improvement effect analysis (animal house odor and environment), and decrease in pollution effect analysis (mainstream testing station and branch discharge). At the moment, the plan had completed establishing the prior data of water usage, labor, flushing hours, pig breeding density, successful breeding rate (survival rate), and solid content increase investigation operations. Please refer to Chapter 3 and 4 for more detail. (3) The above pollution reducing effect analysis should operate according to the following practices: 1. Water quality testing site: mainstream testing station (at least 4 stations), branch discharge (at least 4 branches) 2. Water quality testing items: flow rate, BOD, SS, DO, and NH3-N 3. Testing frequency: complete at least 3 times The plan is to explore how the reduced pollution loading level can influence the river water quality. Hence, testing stations with the highest density of surrounding pig toilets discharges were selected with the highest priority. The plan had already completed 3 mainstream and branch discharge sampling operations; the third water quality sampling operation was completed on November 5th, 2012. In the water quality testing results, the mainstream of Old Zhuoshuixi River, although the testing results of Ludau Bridge in September still shown serious pollution condition when compared to the results in June but the pollution level RPI value had dropped from 7.25 to 6.25. The testing results of Hsihu Bridge in September had dropped from serious pollution condition in June down to medium pollution level (RPI value 3.75). And for branches, the Babauertzuen Neisan discharge and Haifengluen discharge, the test results in September was worse than the results in June; RPI indicator had reached the level of serious pollution. The third river sampling results are still undergoing testing processes. For the mainstream of Lukang Creek, the September Yiuche Bridge testing results were the same as the results in June, both shown signs of serious pollution condition. The September Wanfeng Bridge testing results were actually worse than those in June; the pollution level elevated from medium to serious pollution. For branches, the Chentsuotsuo discharge and Babauertzuen Dungou discharge, the test results in September were worse than those in June; RPI indicator had reached the level of serious pollution condition. The third river sampling results are still undergoing testing processes. The first and second water quality sampling analysis was detailed in Chapter 4. 3. Assist demonstration pig farmers to improve their three step waste water treatment equipment (1) On-site training and counseling to all demonstration pig farmers on the operation and maintenance of their three step waste water treatment equipment (including solid-liquid separator, anaerobic processor, and aerobic processor (clarifier)). Five counseling sessions had been completed during the execution period for increasing the waste water treatment effect. At the moment, the plan had scheduled to complete five on-site training and counseling sessions for 25 demonstration farmers’ treatment equipment before installation of pig toilet. During each counseling session, besides informing farmers of improvement recommendations, written documentations had handed to farmers in conjunction with on-site communication and coordination, aiming at achieving the optimal counseling effect. Related water quality testing results were detailed in Chapter 5. (2) Targeting demonstration pig farmers for completing at least three process efficiency improvements of three step waste water treatment equipment before and after the installation of the equipment (should at least include items like original waste water, solid-liquid separator, anaerobic processor, and clarifier discharge quality testing: NH3-N, SS, BOD, and COD at the minimum). In coordination with counseling sessions for demonstration farmers’ treatment equipment, at the moment, three samplings had already been conducted for each of the 25 demonstration farmers. Samples from the third water sampling are still undergoing its testing process. With the water quality data analysis, current conditions of all treatment equipment at pig farmers were effectively identified and subsequently, proper improvement recommendations were also presented. Please refer to Chapter 5 for detail analysis. 4. Conduct at least one promotional presentation for pig toilet associated effects and provide at least 300 copies of promotional direct materials The promotional presentation had been held on December 12th, 256 pig farmers from Old Zhuoshuixi River and Yuanlindapai (Lukang Creek) drainage area were invited, 188 farmers attended with an attendance ratio of 73%. During the presentation, farmers with good results from 2011 demonstration plan and 2012 demonstrators were commended in the meeting with the hope to create an initiation for attracting more farmers to join the procession for promoting clean pig farming administration. 5. In coordination with the promotional policy of Environmental Protection Bureau, periodically collect pig toilet implementation effects from counties and cities within the country The plan had completed data collection operation from March to October, 2012. At the moment, counties and cities, which yet to report back includes Nantou and Yunlin County. And for October, 2012, counties and cities yet to report back include Hsinchu County, Nantou County, Yunlin County, and Kaohsiung City. The plan had compiled the collected data for the period of March to October, 2012 and submitted to Environmental Protection Bureau for presenting to the Environmental Protection Administration. Please refer to Chapter 6 for related investigation and statistical data.
英文關鍵字 Source Reduction;Clean Pig Farming;Pig Toilet