環境資源報告成果查詢系統

車用汽、柴油品質現場查核計畫

中文摘要 本計畫執行期程為102年2月26日至12月31日,主要工作內容為依據『空氣污染防制費收費辦法』辦理移動污染源空氣污染防制費初審作業、依據『車用汽柴油販賣進口許可及管理辦法』及『車用汽柴油成分管制標準』,對製造者及進口者之廠(場)區、成品儲槽、油庫、銷售地點或其他公私場所,查核相關資料及檢測汽柴油品質以及持續蒐集國內外油品(含生質燃料)管制相關資料。本計畫統計102年1~12月全國共計徵收汽油空污費約19.2億元,柴油空污費約9.1億元,全國計徵收汽柴油空污費約28.3億元,汽柴油月平均申報量與101年比較均呈下降趨勢,根據歷年平均油價來看,95無鉛汽油已從100年31.80元/公升上漲至102年34.89元/公升,超級柴油也從100年29.12元/公升上漲102年32.25元/公升,推論部分民眾因油價持續調漲,改搭乘大眾運輸系統,或近年油電車、電動機車及電動自行車之銷售使用量增加亦為可能影響因素,使得市場需求量減少,進而影響空污費申報金額下降。空污費網路申報系統方面,本計畫除針對微軟例行性發布進行更新,另進行弱點掃瞄查核,根據弱點掃瞄結果顯示,系統並無存在任何潛在風險。本計畫彙整歷年空氣污染指標與不良日數比率作為污染防制績效指標,施政績效指標則採用歷年環保施政意向調查之「民眾對空氣品質改善之滿意度」與「空氣污染困擾源來自汽機車廢氣比例」,根據對稱性比較結果,94年、96年、100年及101年分別降低汽、柴油硫含量管制值之施政績效已確實反映於94~101年之污染防制績效,且移動污染源之空氣品質逐漸改善且獲致民眾肯定。另依據總用油量分配比例推估結果計算,96~101年汽油車、機車及柴油車之徵收金額占比約為57%、10%及33%,而單一費率實施期間,100年及101年汽柴油之歲計賸餘為正值,顯示目前實施單一費率之費基、費率制度可穩定移動污染源空污費基金之收入來源。另分析業者汽油硫含量,各煉油廠1~12月檢驗結果介於2~9 mg/kg,各煉油廠1~12月柴油硫含量檢驗結果介於4~9 mg/kg,均符合管制標準。於現場查核方面完成2~11月煉油廠108組、供油中心之182組及加油站120組之汽柴油採樣,其中1組供油中心柴油硫含量與1組加油站汽油硫含量超出管制標準,相關檢驗報告及品保品管資料已送交環保署,其餘樣品檢驗結果均符合「車用汽柴油成分管制標準」;6~7月份並完成6家生質柴油業者現場查核,根據查核結果生質柴油廠商中僅有台灣新日化股份有限公司、承德油脂股份有限公司、靖騰能源股份有限公司及昇暘生質能源股份有限公司4家進行生質柴油生產,另已針對台灣新日化公司及承德油脂股份有限公司2家公司進行B100生質柴油抽檢,檢驗結果符合管制標準。國外管制規範方面,歐盟燃料品質規範之重點包含禁用含鉛汽油及降低燃料硫含量,美國環保署則依據各項評估計畫(如新配方汽油計畫、汽油硫含量限制計畫、移動源空氣污染物計畫等)研擬相關管制規範,亞洲國家如日本、南韓、香港特別行政區及我國多遵循歐盟相關規範,汽、柴油硫含量均已加嚴至10mg/kg。2場油品稽查管制業務成果座談會議已分別於6月17日及11月12日辦理完畢,會議中除說明非法油品送驗基準外,並針對目前油品稽查程序與成果進行交流,同時就國內外生質燃料發展趨勢及推動現況進行說明,根據會議結論,雖然地方環保局之車用柴油稽查不合格率已日趨下降,仍建議持續就柴油車動力計檢測站及路邊攔檢加強稽查,以達嚇阻作用,另目前國內生質柴油料源約80%來自廢食用油,進口來源部分則概分為國外生產之生質柴油或能源作物,惟國內政策仍以使用國內廢食用油為優先。102年全國非法油品稽查案件數達76,363件,不合格件數51件,不合格率為0.07%,除漁業署持續調整漁船用油優惠政策及稽查管控漁船用油量外,環保署及各縣市環保局歷年推動非法油品加強稽查抽驗機制亦獲明顯成效。1~12月份地方執行機關已提供6組非法油品之樣品,6組非法樣品之硫含量均超出標準值10mg/kg,多環芳香烴含量均符合標準值11%,另經GC/FID及GC/MS分析圖譜比對後判定為漁船用油及添加溶劑等異常情形共計2組。
中文關鍵字 空氣污染防制費、申報量、硫含量、生質燃料、非法油品

基本資訊

專案計畫編號 EPA-102-FA13-03-D007 經費年度 102 計畫經費 8200 千元
專案開始日期 2013/02/26 專案結束日期 2013/12/31 專案主持人 陳宇揚
主辦單位 空保處 承辦人 陳惠琦 執行單位 財團法人台灣產業服務基金會

成果下載

類型 檔名 檔案大小 說明
期末報告 epa-F0-1027171185-03-06.pdf 5MB 期末報告

The Field Inspection for the Quality of Automobile Gasoline and Diesel Fuels

英文摘要 The project period was from Feb 9, 2013 to Dec 31, 2013. The tasks included prior auditing the air pollution control fee for non-stationary pollution sources based on the “Air Pollution Control Fee Collection Regulations”, inspecting the data and testing the quality of gasoline and diesel fuels in producers/importers’ refineries, storages, depots, retails and other distribution places based on the “Selling and Importing Permit Management of Automobile Gasoline and Diesel Fuels” and the “Standards for the Composition of Automobile Gasoline and Diesel Fuels”, and collecting and analyzing the foreign and domestic regulations of fuels(including bio-fuel). From January to December, the air pollution control fees of gasoline and diesel collected were 1.92 billion and 0.91 billion NT dollars, respectively. The total was 2.83 billion NT dollars. The monthly average volumes of gasoline and diesel were declined comparing to 2012. According to the average fuel prices, the price of 95 unleaded gasoline had raised from 31.80 NT/liter in 2011 to 34.89 NT/liter in 2013, the price of diesel had raised from 29.12 NT/liter in 2011 to 32.25 NT/liter in 2013. The reason for the air pollution control fee declined may result in people switching to the mass transportation or hybrid cars, electrical motorcycle and electrical bicycle because of the fuel price rising. About the web reporting system of air pollution control fees, excepting the routine update from the Microsoft, the vulnerability scanning results showed no existing risk. From January to November, The average sulfur contents of gasoline and diesel produced by domestic refineries were between 2~9 mg/kg and 4~9 mg/kg respectively. For the field inspection, the sampling number of gasoline and diesel fuels was 108 for refineries, 182 for depots, and 120 for gas stations. There were 2 samples’ sulfur contents exceeding the standard. One was sampled from the fuel depot and the other was sampled from the gas station. The samples’ testing results and quality assurance data had been sent to EPA. All the other testing results complied with the “Standards for the Composition of Automobile Gasoline and Diesel Fuels”. Besides, the field inspections of 6 bio-diesel entities had been finished during June to July. Only 4 bio-diesel entities were in operation. In the aspect of foreign fuel regulations, the main purposes of the fuel quality regulations in European Union were unleaded gasoline and low sulfur content. US Environmental Protection Agency promulgated fuel regulations based on the various evaluation projects including Reformulated Gasoline project, Tier 2 project, and Mobile Source Air Toxics project. Asian countries like Japan, Korea, Hong Kong and Taiwan are following the fuel regulation of European Union mostly. The sulfur content in gasoline and diesel had been restricted to 10 mg/kg. 2 fuel inspection tasks and achievements forum had been hold on 17th June and 12th November. Even though the unqualified rate of automobile diesel had been decreased in recent years, the diesel vehicle emission testing station and curbside inspections should keep operating to stop the illegal activities. There were 76,363 inspections for illegal fuel from first quarter to third quarter in 2013. 51 samples were found unqualified. The unqualified rate was 0.07%. The illegal fuel inspection systems of EPA and municipal EPB had achieved the effective result. The municipalities provided 6 illegal fuel samples for testing during the project time. All the samples’ sulfur contents exceeded the standard 10mg/kg but PAH contents complied with the standard 11%. Those samples had been analyzed by GC/FID and GC/MS equipment, and there found 2 abnormal samples which were confirmed as fishing vessels fuel and waste solvent added fuel by the spectrum comparison.
英文關鍵字 air pollution control fee, reporting volumes, sulfur content, bio-fuel, illegal fuel.