環境資源報告成果查詢系統

102年奈米科技之風險感知及政策研究

中文摘要 本研究透過文獻回顧、電話抽樣調查、網路問卷調查、跨年及跨國比較,並且進行媒體內容分析,探討台灣民眾對奈米科技的風險感知,以及媒體對奈米科技的報導,對政府推動環境奈米計畫的政策意涵。本研究完成1,077份20歲以上台灣民眾的電話抽樣調查,以及1,068份20-49歲台灣民眾的網路問卷調查,並且分析2011年1月至2013年3月台灣的四大平面媒體(自由時報、蘋果日報、聯合報、中國時報),有關奈米科技的報導。電話抽樣調查的結果發現,有近九成的台灣民眾聽過奈米科技,高居歐美各國之冠,其中約有一半曾經使用過奈米產品,但是相較於美國,台灣民眾對奈米科技的知識,答對的比例並沒有比較高。媒體內容分析的結果顯示,台灣有關奈米科技的媒體報導有逐年升高的趨勢,不過有關奈米科技的新聞主要出現在「商業/財經」版(45.7%),有關利益的報導,主要是「消費產品的利益」(25.3%),與「電腦利益」(17.4%),有關風險的報導非常少,主要的消息來源是產業及學界,來自政府部門的訊息幾乎沒有。本研究根據研究結果,提出定期追蹤民意動向、評估奈米標章與標示、建立資訊平台主動發佈新聞,以及建立公民參與風險治理的管道等五項政策建言。
中文關鍵字 奈米科技;風險感知;媒體內容分析;政策

基本資訊

專案計畫編號 EPA-102-U1U1-02-100 經費年度 102 計畫經費 1500 千元
專案開始日期 2013/02/06 專案結束日期 2013/12/31 專案主持人 鄭尊仁
主辦單位 永續發展室(停用) 承辦人 蘇鈺珊 執行單位 國立臺灣大學職業醫學與工業衛生研究所

成果下載

類型 檔名 檔案大小 說明
期末報告 102年奈米科技之風險感知及政策期末報告(定稿).pdf 4MB

The Risk Perceptions and Policy Resaerches of Nanotechnology

英文摘要 This study is to explore the risk perceptions of nanotechnology of the general population in Taiwan. The main contents include: (1) to collect and review the risk perception publications; (2) to design a risk perception core questionnaire; (3) to conduct a survey on risk perceptions of general population; (4) to investigate the media reports on nanotechnology; and (5) to summarize the policy implication of public concerns on nanotechnology. We completed 1,077 randomized telephone survey of Taiwanese people of 18 years and older, and 1,068 web-based internet survey of 20 to 49 year olds. Further, we investigated the conotents of news reports on nanotechnology in four major newspaper in Taiwan from Jan, 2011 to March, 2013. The results of telephone survey indicated that almost nighty percent of Taiwanese people have heard of nanotechnology in Taiwan, and about half of them have used nano-products. Though the familiarity of nanotechnology in Taiwan was higher than that was in the Eropean countries and the US, the knowledge of nanotechnology was lower as compared to the US surveys. The news reports on nanotechnology are increasing steadily in the past few years. However, they were mainly reported in the sections of Business (45.7%), Living and society (18.1), Regional (14%), and very few were reported in the sections of Science and technology (4.5%) or Education (3.4%). The main sources of information in these reports on nanotechnology were from industry and academia. There were very few information provided by the governmental agencies. Policy implication of the study was discussed at the end of this report.
英文關鍵字 Nanotechnology;Risk perception;Media content analysis;Policy implicateon