環境資源報告成果查詢系統

103至104年度光化學評估監測站操作品保例行性計畫

中文摘要 本計畫主要工作目標包括執行光化學評估監測站儀器品保查核、監測數據標準化處理作業、探討區域污染特徵及評估光化學監測站現有運轉成效、測站位置適切性,提出光化測站調整建議。 本年度執行成果在儀器品保部分,除完成品保查核作業手冊修定外,同時亦依核定之作業手冊規範完成各項查核,現場查核缺失部份已改善完成;數據品質查核,103年度除萬華站(10月)、土城站(10月)、臺西站(1月、9月及10月)、朴子站(2月)、臺南站(10月)、潮州站(5月、8月及12月)、5號監測車(8月、9月及10月),104年度忠明站(2月)、朴子站(5月)、臺南站(6月)、小港站(6月、7月、9月及10月)、潮州站(12月)、5號監測車(3月、5月、6月、8月、9月及10月)、6號監測車(4月及10月)之數據妥善率未達品保要求外,其餘均符合品保規範;系統查核結果顯示,各測站於103及104年度之正戊烷(n-Pentane)、甲苯(Toluene)、環戊烷(Cyclopentane)及1,3,5-三甲基苯(1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene)滯留時間相對差異百分比均符合品保規範±5%,且差異範圍均於1分鐘以內;103年度績效查核結果,臺南站及5號監測車有少數物種(包括Ethylbenzene、Styrene)偏差超出品保設定±25%,其餘年度查核項目均符合品保規範。臺南站已於103年11月更換新的標準氣體,104年購入之標準品將優先更換5號監測車,104年度績效查核結果,各測站各測項均符合品保規範之±25%。 在測站位置適切性部份,綜合各測站歷年統計結果,以萬華站、土城站及潮州站較無法發揮其監測目標,測站位置調整則建議優先考量桃園縣測站,桃園為全台第一工業科技大縣,本站可能之工業監測目標包含經濟部工業園區、私人開發工業園區及都市計畫重劃工業區且另兼具交通排放源之監測。
中文關鍵字 揮發性有機物質、光化測站

基本資訊

專案計畫編號 EPA-103-FA11-03-A109 經費年度 103 計畫經費 6550 千元
專案開始日期 2014/01/13 專案結束日期 2016/01/31 專案主持人 宋德高
主辦單位 監資處 承辦人 陳彥君 執行單位 中環科技事業股份有限公司

成果下載

類型 檔名 檔案大小 說明
期末報告 103至104年光化學評估監測站操作品保例行性計畫總結報告定稿.pdf 75MB
英文摘要 The main objectives of this program included implementing the quality assurance audits of analytical systems for Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Stations (PAMS), standardizing the data processing procedures for the collected results, characterizing the local pollutant profiles of different areas, evaluating the effectiveness of the operation, assessing the suitability of the locations for the monitoring stations and submitting the proposal for proper station adjustment. The quality assurance auditing manual was revised and all audits were carried out accordingly. The field audit results are complete; the deficiencies have improved. The data quality audits in each PAMS met the quality assurance criteria (90%) except for Wan Hua PAMS in October, Tu Cheng PAMS in October, Tai Hsi PAMS in January, September and December, Pu Tze PAMS in February, Tainan PAMS in October, Chau Jou PAMS in May, August and September, and Mobile laboratory 5 in August, September and October of 2014, Zhong ming PAMS in February, Pu Tze PAMS in May, Tainan PAMS in June, Xiao gang PAMS in June, July, September and October, Chau Jou PAMS in December, Mobile laboratory 5 in March, May, June, August, September and October, Mobile laboratory 6 in April and October for 2015, respectively. System audit results indicated that the relative percent deviations of retention times for n-Pentane, Toluene, Cyclopentane and 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene of all stations met the quality assurance criteria of ±5% for 2014 and 2015. The absolute retention time differences for all the above compounds were less than one minute which met the requirement as well. The annual performance check results indicated a few compounds, such as Ethylbenzene and Styrene, were found to exceed the ±25% limit for Tainan PAMS and Mobile laboratory 5. Most of the other PAMS analyses met the quality assurance criteria. Tainan PAMS started using a new standard gas 103 in November, standard gas purchases of 2015 will give priority to replacing that used in Mobile laboratory 5, the annual performance check results indicated that all stations met the quality control criteria of ±25% for 2015. The comprehensive review of the results for all PAMS indicated that Wan Hua, Tu Cheng and Chau Jou PAMS’ were not as effective at meeting the monitoring objectives as the other stations were. It is suggested that if any PAMS are to be relocated, Tao Yuan County should be considered high priority. Tao Yuan County has the largest number of technology companies in Taiwan. The possible monitoring targets of the station in the county include the Industrial Parks of Ministry of Economic Affairs and Industrial Parks developed by private sector or by urban planning renovation. The station could also serve as a tool to monitor vehicular pollutants.
英文關鍵字 Volatile Organic Compound (VOC)、Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Stations(PAMS)