環境資源報告成果查詢系統

農地重金屬污染來源及途徑判定評析計畫

中文摘要 本計畫合約期程是自103年10月23日至105年04月22日止。考量各縣市農地土壤污染案件層出不窮,陸續投入的整治經費亦無法獲得有效的求償,主要原因為污染源之污染行為與農地污染結果之間無法建立有效的因果關聯性。源此本計畫主要工作目標為研擬農地重金屬污染來源查證程序,冀望協助主管機關有效率的搜尋污染整治責任主體,並建立污染源、污染途徑、受體之間因果關係的查證流程與方法,以利釐清農地污染成因,除避免農地土壤污染事件持續發生及擴大,並能向污染整治責任人據以求償。 依計畫合約規定需篩選試辦驗證區進行污染查證作業,故在本計畫提出的查證標的區篩選機制架構下,另考量試辦驗證區須檢視查證程序適用性,故篩選不同樣態的場址(彰化埔心試辦驗證區、臺南鹽水試辦驗證區、臺中大里試辦驗證區、苗栗苑裡試辦驗證區)進行查證程序的驗證。 試辦區依據本計畫提出的查證程序執行相關調查作業(查證前的評估作業、污染整治責任人搜尋及調查作業、受體調查作業、傳輸途徑調查作業及建立三者因果關聯性),最終結果顯示本查證程序確實能提供主管機關搜尋污染整治責任主體之方法,並能協助建立污染源、傳輸途徑及受體的因果關聯性,但實務上仍會受限空間、時間變異而難取得直接證據,加上時空背景因素,造成求償認定的困難與違法事實舉證上之難度,這些都非良善的查證程序所能克服的問題。 此外,有鑑於農地污染事件多因灌溉水質不良所致,故如何規範預防性措施與訂定監測方式是預防農地污染事件發生的重要關鍵,因此本計畫提出農地重金屬污染潛勢監控系統與農用土地整合預防機制,並整合相關權責單位,透過(1)農地土壤品質預防性監控、(2)灌溉系統預防性監控、(3)污染源稽查及科學性預警監控、(4)國土用地規劃等策略,以達到避免農地再遭受污染的目標。
中文關鍵字 農地重金屬污染、農地重金屬污染查證、污染行為人

基本資訊

專案計畫編號 EPA-103-GA12-03-A260 經費年度 103 計畫經費 2124 千元
專案開始日期 2014/04/23 專案結束日期 2016/04/22 專案主持人 林徽雅
主辦單位 土污基管會 承辦人 吳佩洋 執行單位 富立業工程顧問(股)公司

成果下載

類型 檔名 檔案大小 說明
期末報告 EPA-103-GA12-03-A260網路公開版.pdf 44MB

Investigation and Determination of the Sources and Pathways of Farmlands Contaminated with Heavy Metals

英文摘要 Farmland soil contamination cases happened in cities and counties continuously, funding of remediation was invested successively, but receiving no compensation were due to the association of contamination sources, behaviors and acceptors wasn’t established completely. In vew of this, the purpose of project was clarified the association of contaminant sources, pathways and acceptors, established the procedure of farmland soil contamination investigation, and assisted authorities to trace the perpetrators. According to contract, this project is executed from October 23rd, 2014 to April 22nd, 2016. The aim of project were screened the sample regions and surveyed, established and verificated the investigation procedures, and considered the applicability of procedures. The selecting of four contaminated sites including Puxin region in Changhua county, Yanshui region in Tainan city, Dali region in Taichung city, and Yuanli region in Miaoli county. Survey of regions implemented in accordance with investigation procedures (check before the job evaluation, remediation responsible for search and survey operations, survey operations receptor, transmission route survey operations and the establishment of a causal association between the three), the final results proved the investigation procedures assisted authorities to trace the main responsibility of contamination actually, and contributed to the establishment of associations of contamination sources, transmission pathways and receptors, but in practice, it is still limited by variances in space and time, and difficult to obtain direct evidences. In addition to other background factors maked the claim recognized and illegal facts proved difficult, these problems can’t be overcomed by general verification procedures. Otherwise, the farmland soil contamination were caused by deterioration of irrigated water quality, the preventive measurements and monitoring methods are the sticking point to prevent contamination. Thus, the potential monitoring system of heavy metal and preventive mechanism of farmland was proposed to authorities, and avoided that farmland soil contamination cases happened again. by some tactics included (1) the preventive monitoring of soil quality (2) preventive monitoring systems of irrigation water (3) preventive alarm monitoring of contaminant source inspection and (4) Land-use planning.
英文關鍵字 Heavy metal contamination in farmland, Investigation on the heavy metal contamination of farmland, The perpetrator of contamination