整合及考評地方政府執行空氣污染防制成效專案工作計畫
| 中文摘要 | 本計畫工作內容主要為彙整評析縣(市)管制工作之有效性，提出管制對策，提升縣(市)SIP計畫執行績效有效運用空污費。雖多數縣(市)共通性計畫執行空窗期在3個月以內，但仍有部份縣(市)需加強改善其計畫之年度接軌情形。污染源管制工作成效評析方面，針對空氣品質改善維護計畫、許可證審查、加嚴排放標準、機車稽查管制、柴油車管制、空品淨區管制、營建工程管制、露天燃燒管制與空品淨化區進行分析。另以CMAQ模式模擬關閉八種特定污染源之排放，結果顯示西部地區受柴油車與汽油車/機車等排放影響最為顯著，宜蘭縣與花蓮縣則以水泥業排放影響較為顯著，臺東縣則為露天燃燒；並探討各縣(市)環保局提出PM2.5的管制工作策略，提供管制建議。 在協助執行績效考評作業方面，完成103年陳情資料篩選，103年陳情案件受理件數為91,357件，較102年增加8,878件。「民眾空氣品質改善滿意度」問卷調查3,544份，民眾對環保局在改善空氣品質滿意度比例由102年60.9%上升為71.1%。辦理相關考評會議提供縣市交流與環保署溝通之橋樑，及空污技術諮詢委員提供政策建議之管道。 104年考評要點整併考評指標與簡化考評方式，強化地方環保局執行之成果，修正重點為落實空氣污染防制計畫書之執行與規劃撰寫、強化細懸浮微粒(PM2.5)政策推動、排放量管理計畫、著重縣(市)環保局固定、逸散、移動污染源與空氣品質淨化區之整體表現與強化。 「SIP考評資訊應用系統」之資料庫建立與維護方面，開發季報線上填寫系統，以利後續系統擴充增編，此外，為提升系統使用效益，更新與新增系統功能與內容，使系統使用上更趨完備。 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 中文關鍵字 | 查核、考評、指標 | ||
基本資訊
| 專案計畫編號 | EPA-103-FA15-03-A237 | 經費年度 | 103 | 計畫經費 | 8090 千元 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 專案開始日期 | 2014/06/18 | 專案結束日期 | 2015/04/30 | 專案主持人 | 李嘉琪 |
| 主辦單位 | 空保處 | 承辦人 | 謝議輝 | 執行單位 | 鼎環工程顧問股份有限公司 |
成果下載
| 類型 | 檔名 | 檔案大小 | 說明 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 期末報告 | 本文(全)0709.pdf | 8MB |
Achievement and Evaluation for Local EPBs Air Pollution Against Strategies
| 英文摘要 | The scope of this project was to assemble, to evaluate, and to assess the effectiveness of the Environmental Protection Bureaus (EPBs) in conducting air pollution control work. In addition, this project proposed control strategies for local SIP projects to improve the utilization of their air pollution fee. After review, the between-project time for conducting common projects was less than 3 months for most counties and cities, which showed positively in improving efficiency and project continuation. In order to analysis pollution control effectiveness, this project evaluated areas including the Stationary Pollution Source Installation and Operating Permit system, the stricter standards for electric power industry and the steel industry, the inspection/maintenance program for diesel trucks and motorcycles, the open burning control, the control of fugitive dust from riverbank, the construction dust controls, and the management of the air quality purification area. Further, for discussion of PM2.5 policies of EPBs, there were 8 cases were modeling by Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) system. The simulation results are showed that are significant effects of diesel vehicles and construction dust controls in western part of Taiwan, cement industry in Ilan County and Hualien County, and open burning in Taitung County. The number of petition cases in 2014 increased by 8,878 compared with the number in 2013. 3,544 copies of “Questionnaire for the Satisfaction Degree of Air Quality Improvement” were surveyed. The ratio of satisfaction increased from 60.9% in 2013 to 71.0% in 2014. Conferences were held for comments exchange between local EPBs and EPA, and to receive recommendations from the air pollution control technology committees. In term of the Auditing Rules for the Effectiveness of Local EPBs. The objective is to strengthen the EPB’s air pollution control performance through combining and simplifying the audit indicators. The new emphasis in auditing the local air quality management plans will require the implementation and planning PM2.5 control strategies and emissions management to be included in the content. This year we have developed the “SIP Audit Information quarterly online System” and its protocol to facilitate for the addition and expansion. In addition, we added new content and functions to the system in order to improve its effectiveness for the uses. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 英文關鍵字 | Inspect, audit, index | ||