| 英文摘要 |
The objectives of Exective Yuan EPA’s registered professional environmental engineer certification cases review were to understand the quality and defects of certifications processed by certified engineers. The results may be used to guide the improvement of certification engineers and to upgrade the quality of certified Professional Environmental Engineers. Also, Started in 2006, the operations of registered professional engineering organizations have been reviewed. The key points were focused on inspection of work drafts.This year the review of the operation of registered professional engineering organizations found that the most frequent defects was "the results of review is not reasonable or not consistent with the contents of the document”, around 70%. Next on the list were “the certification case shall have calculations and no relevant documents are saved for calculations” and “the first page of the original working manuscripts did not have executed seal and signature ", around 20% each. For this year, review of the operation of registered professional engineering organizations found that only one professional engineer has “not reported certificate case”. For the review of water pollution sites, the most frequent defect was "in the application documents, texts and values were not filled in, incorrect or inconsistent", around 80%, followed by "unreasonable treatment unit design parameters and operational parameters", around 50%. “Operation conditions or control parameters are not consistent with application document”, "mass balance calculation incorrect or unreasonable ", and “wastewater from different processes or sources are not listed separately or tested”, 25% each. The most frequent defect appeared on stationary source onsite review was "in the application documents, texts and values were not filled in, incorrect or inconsistent", around 75%. “Company basic information (gate coordinates, discharge pipe location in relation to the coordinates of the gate, contact person and professional personnel etc.) are not consistent with on site or document” and “Unreasonable design parameters and operational parameters for each processing units of the pollution control facility”, 38% each. The most frequent defects for the on site review of soil and underground water remediation certification cases were “no pollutant information and process contamination control information”, “there are no sampling points deployed and sampled inside the wastewater treatment facility”, “no current conditions of site and history of the site utilization”, carry out sampling point planning and take samples without based on the previous use conditions of the site”, etc. three items.
In addition, to effectively manage the professional engineer certification process, this program established the Registered Professional Environmental Engineer management information system. Through an Internet database, information was provided to every level of environmental control management organizations to make available basic information on professional engineers, including their certification status, review results, and award and punishment received, to improve the management of professional engineer certifications.
Another objective of this program is to continuously assist the evaluation of regulation development for registered professional environmental engineers, environmental engineering industry and environmental consultant companies, the collection of comments for relevant amendments for professional engineer law, professional engineer examination law etc.
|