104年度廢照明光源及廢乾電池回收處理體系調查分析暨執行成效評估專案工作計畫
| 中文摘要 | 本計畫執行期程為104年1月1日至12月31日，已蒐集及調查OLED照明、LED照明、鋰鐵電池及鈉鎳電池相關資訊，作為後續責任物評估納管之參酌。市售乾電池已分別完成55組錳鋅/鹼錳乾電池及45組鈕釦電池採樣及送驗作業，錳鋅/鹼錳乾電池檢驗結果均符合國內規範限值，建議檢討4倍費率及鈕扣電池綠色費率限值標準，市售照明光源部分則完成50組檢驗，建議調整HID之「單位重量汞含量」及加嚴環保標章申請標準，或考量制訂照明光源汞含量限值。為維持基金正常運作，建議調升直管照明光源、錳鋅/筒型鹼錳及鎳鎘電池徵收費率，調降直管及非直管照明光源、錳鋅/筒型鹼錳、一次鋰、二次鋰、鈕扣型鋰及含汞、鎳氫及鎳鎘等七類電池補貼費率，LED照明光源於105年7月1日正式納管為應回收項目，建議徵收費率19.7元/公斤及補貼費率10.8元/公斤。截至104年11月，向環保署申請符合適用綠色費率之鈕扣型含汞電池件數共有136件。104年11月底已篩選120家疑似未登記業者，並提供環保署作為後續查核追繳依據。電弧爐處理廢乾電池朝事業廢棄物處理廠推動，現有嘉德創公司及台灣鋼聯公司開始規劃提出申請，為減少業者未來加入廢乾電池處理所可能衍生之額外成本及限制，已建議並協助環保署針對廢乾電池回收清除處理設施標準中部分條文進行調整。L2公司汞流布複查之空氣中逸散汞量占比29.3％，小於102年占比37.0％，研判加強出料口密閉性、設備縫隙填補、加強集塵效率等改善措施已有效降低汞逸散情形。宣導海報方面，以LED照明及車用電池之回收宣傳為重點。103年度應回收廢棄物回收處理創新研發成果發表會已於104年3月27日在集思台大會議中心辦理完成，104年度評選作業最後公核定14件。 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 中文關鍵字 | 回收處理、費率與補貼費率、重金屬檢驗、創新補助 | ||
基本資訊
| 專案計畫編號 | EPA-104-HA14-03-A021 | 經費年度 | 104 | 計畫經費 | 5600 千元 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 專案開始日期 | 2015/01/01 | 專案結束日期 | 2015/12/31 | 專案主持人 | 黃逸祥 |
| 主辦單位 | 回收基管會 | 承辦人 | 徐伊亭 | 執行單位 | 財團法人台灣產業服務基金會 |
成果下載
| 類型 | 檔名 | 檔案大小 | 說明 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 期末報告 | EPA-104-HA14-03-A021公開.pdf | 8MB |
Inspecting and Analyzing the Collection and Recycling systems of Waste Batteries and Waste Lamps, and Evaluating their Effectiveness
| 英文摘要 | The project period was from Jan 1, 2015 to Dec 31, 2015. The information of OLED lamps, LED lamps, Li-Fe batteries and Na-Ni batteries had been investigated and analyzed for the evaluation of regulating as recyclable wastes. The sampling and testing works of 100 batteries and 50 lamps had been finished. The testing results of Mn-Zn and Alkaline batteries complied with the domestic regulations. The standards of the 4 times fee rate for primary batteries and the green fee rate for button cells should be reviewed according to the testing results. Based on the lamp testing results, it was suggested that the mercury unit weight of the HID lamps should be adjusted, also the applying standard of the eco-label for lamps should be more stringent or even drafting the mercury content limit for lamps directly. The revised fee rates for linear fluorescent lamp, Mn/Zn/Alkaline and Ni-Cd batteries were raised. The revised subsidy rate for linear and non- linear fluorescent lamps, Mn/Zn/Alkaline, primary Li, secondary Li, button cells, Ni-MH and Ni-Cd batteries were reduced. The fee rate and subsidy rates for new regulated LED lamps were 19.7NT/kg and 10.8NT/kg respectively. There were 136 types of button cell batteries qualified for the green fee rate since Nov, 2015. 120 suspicious unregistered entities had been inspected. EPA will continue to trace the recycling fees they should submit. The waste treatment companies, KATEC corp. and Taiwan Steel Union corp., were starting apply the permit of treating waste Mn/Zn/Alkaline batteries by their arc furnaces. In order to reduce the extra cost and limitations for applying the permit, Taiwan EPA already announced the revised version of “Waste Dry Batteries Collection, Storage, Clearance, Disposal Methods and Facility Standards”. For the mercury distribution re-inspection, the mercury emissions to ambient air from L2 corp.’s processing were reduced from 37% to 29%. It was believed that the seal of feeding, processing and discharging areas, enhancing the vacuuming power actually improved the mercury emission. For the poster, the collection of waste LED lamps and waste electric car power batteries should be the main designing point. The 2014 exhibit of the achievement for subsidizing the inventing and researching of regulated recyclable wastes collection and recycling was held in NTU Convention Center on 27th Mar, 2015. There were 14 of cases passed the auditing and qualified for the subsidy. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 英文關鍵字 | collection and recycling, the fee rate and subsidy rate, heavy metal concentrations testing, levy for technical developments | ||