「打開穹頂」：PM2.5公共善治(Good Governance)學術論壇計畫
| 中文摘要 | 本計畫內容包括辦理三個場次地區論壇、一場次學術論壇及學術現地參訪，旨在探討PM2.5議題的治理。 本計畫規劃地區論壇以「PM2.5議題與治理困境」及「PM2.5議題的治理策略發想」作為主軸，並以下列四個主題作為本屆學術論壇議程之主軸：「PM2.5議題的治理面向：挑戰與契機」、「PM2.5議題與產業發展及經濟之選擇」、「PM2.5議題的區域治理與合作」、「PM2.5議題下的大眾健康與風險」。 三場次地區論壇分別於104年10月20日、11月5日及11月11日於臺中、虎尾、嘉義舉辦，一場次學術論壇於同年11月26日於環球科技大學嘉東校區舉辦，11月27日及12月7日舉辦學術現地參訪臺中火力發電廠及雲林麥寮六輕離島工業區。 透過回饋單做滿意度調查，統計結果為「非常滿意」67.3％；「滿意」29.4％；「普通」3.3％；「不滿意」及「非常不滿意」均為0％。集結專家學者的發表及回應，提出以下幾點結論：1.空污資訊無法有效公開、2.臺灣空氣品質監測站普及度低、3.中央政府跟地方政府的政策無法達到共識、4.公部門與私部門之間的溝通不足，無法達到有效合作、5.面對空污議題，僅提出緊急應變措施。另提出建議：1.提升公開空污資訊的有效度、2.提升臺灣空氣品質監測站的普及度、3.提升中央政府與地方政府的合作與共識、4.促成公私部門之間的有效對話，協力改善空氣品質、5.除了緊急應變措施，也應規劃永續的空氣品質改善政策政策。 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 中文關鍵字 | 細懸浮微粒、治理、公共善治 | ||
基本資訊
| 專案計畫編號 | EPA-104-FA12-03-D106 | 經費年度 | 104 | 計畫經費 | 580 千元 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 專案開始日期 | 2015/09/17 | 專案結束日期 | 2015/12/31 | 專案主持人 | 陳泰安 |
| 主辦單位 | 空保處 | 承辦人 | 陳月詩 | 執行單位 | 環球學校財團法人環球科技大學 |
成果下載
| 類型 | 檔名 | 檔案大小 | 說明 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 期末報告 | EPA-104-FA1203-D106.pdf | 32MB |
"To Open The Dome": PM2.5 public good governance academic forum project
| 英文摘要 | The program contains three regional forums, an academic forum and academic visit. The main themes in the regional forum are "PM2.5 issues and Governance Dilemma" and " PM2.5 issues’ governance policies ideas", and the following four themes as a spindle of this academic forum agenda: "PM2.5 governance issues oriented : Challenges and Opportunities "," PM2.5 issues and industrial development and economy selection "," PM2.5 issues of regional governance and cooperation "," Under the PM2.5 issues of public health and risk. " Three regional forums were respectively held in Taichung, Huwei, and Chiayi in 2015 October 20, November 5, and November 11. An academic forum was held at Transworld University of Science and Technology on November 26. Furthermore, holding academic visit at Taichung power plant on November 27 and Six naphtha cracker complex in Yunlin on December 7. Using the feedback from do the satisfaction survey, statistical results as "very satisfied" of 67.3%; " satisfied " of 29.4% ; " ordinary " of 3.3% ; "not satisfied" and "very dissatisfied" of 0%. According to the responses and opinions made by the experts and scholars, the following conclusions are proposed: 1.The air pollution information cannot be effective public, 2.Taiwan's air quality monitoring stations are low popularity, 3.The central government and local governments cannot reach a consensus on several policies, 4.The communication between the public sectors and the private sectors were insufficient to achieve effective cooperation, 5.Faced with air pollution issues only proposed contingency measures. Making the proposals for conclusions: 1.Complete information on air pollution is disclosed, 2.More air quality monitoring stations should be established, 3.Cooperation and consensus between the central government and local governments should be made, 4.Effective dialogue between the public and private sectors should be encouraged to improve air quality; 5.Other than emergency measures, the long-term plan on air quality improvement policies should be set up. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 英文關鍵字 | PM2.5, Governance, Public Good Governance | ||