環境資源報告成果查詢系統

屏東縣地下水中高濃度砷之來源調查與評析計畫

中文摘要 本報告執行日期自104年8月7日起至106年1月5日止。工作團隊針對屏東平原地下水與土壤富砷現象,彙整屏東平原水文地質背景文獻資料、沖積平原地下水富砷案例及研究資料、環保署監測井與水利署觀測井地下水質檢測紀錄,以及屏東縣各項土壤及地下水專案計畫之土壤檢測紀錄。本計畫調查之地下水井分為三類:第一類為歷年檢測記錄顯示砷濃度偏高之監測井(18座);第二類為前述監測井周邊或下游之監測井(11座);第三類為第一類監測井周邊或下游之民井(18座)。工作團隊於104年10月下旬、105年3月下旬及9月上旬完成三次地下水採樣檢測工作;並於前述29座監測井周邊完成10處調查樣區之表土砷含量調查工作,以及29處地質剖面採樣調查工作。 分析結果顯示,共計20座(10座監測井、10座民井) 之地下水砷濃度達 0.01 mg/L,其中8座(2座監測井、6座民井)之地下水砷濃度達0.05 mg/L;民井地下水中砷濃度較監測井為高,研判與鑿井深度有關,且受氧化還原狀態與溶氧之影響,砷物種以無機型態為主,監測井與民井地下水分別以As(Ⅲ)及As(Ⅴ)為主;依砷、鐵以及含氮物質濃度之消長,推測砷的釋出受地下水還原環境影響所致。根據地質剖面調查,各監測井井篩深度之土壤砷含量普遍偏低;而農地表土砷含量調查則發現崁頂國小附近農地,其民井邊入水口表土檢出達監測標準及管制標準各一點次,引灌地下水應為表土富砷之主因。此外,工作團隊於港東地區執行鑽探取樣分析作業,發現港東地區地層土壤砷型態主要為鐵鋁氫氧化物結合相,顯示地層砷可經由還原溶解作用而釋出至地下水,表土砷序列萃取結果亦呈現以無定形之鐵錳氧化物結合相為主;另前往中央地質調查所,以手持式X射線螢光分析儀檢測崁頂國小與港東國小觀測井岩心樣品,結果均顯示在特定深度之地層中有砷富集的現象。屏東地區地下水砷濃度模擬結果,顯示沿海地區地下水砷濃度多數超過飲用水標準,內陸地區幾乎為飲用水標準以下,土壤砷含量模擬結果亦顯示沿海地區土壤砷含量偏高。國人因攝食砷污染場址所栽植之水稻,進而產生砷暴露之健康風險評估可得知,危害商數及致癌風險之中位數值,後者超過可接受風險,國人若食用調查場址所種植之水稻,將產生較高之罹癌風險。
中文關鍵字 富砷地下水、風險評估、砷來源調查

基本資訊

專案計畫編號 104As 經費年度 104 計畫經費 6058.795 千元
專案開始日期 2015/08/07 專案結束日期 2017/02/06 專案主持人 鄭世堃
主辦單位 屏東縣政府環境保護局 承辦人 卓威廷 執行單位 富立業工程顧問股份有限公司

成果下載

類型 檔名 檔案大小 說明
期末報告 期末定稿.pdf 35MB

Investigation and Determination of the Sources of High Concentration of Arsenic in Groundwater in Pingtung County

英文摘要 The program is scheduled for August 7, 2015 to January 5, 2017. The aim of this program was to investigate the source and releasing mechanisms of arsenic in groundwater, and survey of arsenic accumulation in farmland soil by summarized the researches of hydrological and geological properties of the Pingtung Plain, survey data of groundwater qualities from Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Protection Bureau of Pingtung county and Water Resources Agency, sampled groundwater from 29 monitoring wells and 18 pump-wells, 29 soil profiles and soils in 10 areas. According to the results, the concentration of arsenic was higher than 0.01 mg/L in 20 wells, was higher than 0.05 mg/L in 8 wells, and arsenic in groundwater in pump-wells is generally higher than that of monitoring wells, it’s related to well-depth and the redox condition in groundwater. The speciation of arsenic in groundwater is mainly inorganic phase, and the contents of As (Ⅲ) and As (Ⅴ) are mainly from groundwater of pump-well and groundwater of monitoring wells. It is speculated that the release of arsenic is caused by the reduction of groundwater, due to the concentration of arsenic, iron and nitrogen containing compounds changes. Survey results showed that the arsenic content in Kanding Farmland soils was higher than the regulatory standard, the main reason cited for the irrigation groundwater. It’s showed that arsenic is held together with hydrous oxides od Fe and Al, and released by reduction in aquifer by core-drilling. Compared to the core samples from Central Geological SURVEY, MOEA, the results showed arsenic enriched in a particular phenomenon in the formation of the depth. The simulated arsenic concentration of groundwater in Pingtung area shows that the arsenic concentration of groundwater in the coastal area mostly exceeds the drinking water standard, and the inland area is almost below the drinking water standard. The arsenic content of soil showed the same distribution. The health risk assessment of arsenic exposure at the site of arsenic contaminated sites is known as the median value of the risk of quotient and carcinogenic risk, which exceeds the acceptable risk, and if the person is eating the site Rice, will have a higher risk of cancer.
英文關鍵字 Arsenic-rich groundwater, risk assessment, Investigation of the sources of arsenic