環境資源報告成果查詢系統

105年高屏地區戶外登革熱病媒蚊孳生源清除監控計畫

中文摘要   根據臺灣疾病管制署的統計資料,民國104年登革熱確診病例共有43,419例,主要集中於高雄市(19,723例)及臺南市(22,760例),總死亡人數達214人,較往年增加。故本計畫希望藉由登革熱病媒蚊之監測、戶外孳生源之清除,並配合環境教育提升民眾的防治知識、態度及行為,期能提供登革熱防治之正確導向。   完成高屏地區登革熱高風險區12里之每週定期戶外病媒蚊密度調查外,並配合本年度病例之發生,增加監測2里;每里設置5個誘蚊產卵器,14里共設置70個;並於環保署指定網站,登錄誘蚊產卵調查結果,提供孳生源清除相關建議,總計地方環保單位發動至少115次孳生源清除活動,達降低病例發生之風險。   完成高屏地區戶外病媒蚊孳生源調查及清除共306處,以防病媒蚊孳生;調查結果發現戶外之孳生源種類,以保麗龍製品或塑膠製品、免洗餐具最多。   已對高屏地區登革熱過去常發生之區域,進行鄰里長、社區志工、一般民眾及學生之孳生源清除環境教育,共完成辦理9場,參與人數合計1,209人,並發動社區民眾自我檢查登革熱病媒蚊孳生源,利用社區觀念的共識,一起清除孳生源,預計影響民眾可達萬人;環境教育之成效評估,對一般民眾及國小學童,採有獎徵答方式,加深印象;對國中生,採用連署簽名方式,利用承諾提升行動力,達到宣導目的;對大學生,則於環境教育前後,分別進行問卷調查,加以評估其成效,環境教育前後兩次均填答之問卷,共計102份,結果顯示環境教育後,對登革熱之防治認知、態度及行為,在統計學上,均有顯著性地提升(p < 0.05)。   並於辦理環境教育前,先進行問卷調查,以了解民眾對登革熱防治之認知、態度及行為,共計回收613份有效問卷,結果民眾對登革熱防治之知識、態度及行為,大多均能正確回答,可能是本年度民眾除本計畫之環境教育外,亦已接受多場環境教育之故,因此,未來應持續推動民眾,落實執行孳生源清除工作,以防登革熱之發生。
中文關鍵字 登革熱、病媒蚊密度、誘蚊產卵指數、環境教育、孳生源清除

基本資訊

專案計畫編號 EPA-105-J101-02-229 經費年度 105 計畫經費 1950 千元
專案開始日期 2016/04/15 專案結束日期 2016/12/31 專案主持人 白秀華
主辦單位 環管處 承辦人 張家銓 執行單位 國立高雄大學

成果下載

類型 檔名 檔案大小 說明
期末報告 EPA-105-J101-02-229.pdf 18MB

Cleanliness campaign and surveillance program of outdoor dengue vector breeding sources in Kaohsiung and Pingtung, 2016.

英文摘要 According to statistics of Centers for Disease Control, R.O.C.(Taiwan), there were 43,419 confirmed cases of dengue fever in 2015. The cases were mainly in Kaohsiung city (19,723cases) and Tainan city (22,760cases), and the death toll stood at 214 which was more than last year. Hence, the purpose of this project was to provide accurate guidance of dengue control through dengue vector surveillance, outdoor breeding sources cleanliness, environmental education, improving the public’s knowledge of prevention and control, attitude and behavior for the community. The implementation of outdoor weekly investigations on the density of dengue vector mosquitoes on a regular basis within 12 boroughs of high dengue fever risk areas among Kaohsiung and Pingtung was completed. Because of the bursting cases this year, the surveillance distance was increased within 2 boroughs. There were 5 ovitrap breeding traps every borough, hence, 70 traps were set within 14 boroughs. Besides, the results of ovitrap were uploaded on specific websites, and provided related suggestions on breeding sources cleanliness of dengue vector. The campaign of breeding sources cleanliness was held at least 115 times by local environmental protection agencies, this record was able to lower the risk of case occurring. 306 sites of outdoor breeding sources investigation and elimination were completed in Kaohsiung and Pingtung in order to prevent dengue vectors. The results showed that outdoor breeding sources containers were styrofoam-made products, plastic products and disposable tableware the most. In Kaohsiung and Pingtung, 9 environmental education campaigns of breeding sources cleanliness were held, which dengue fever occurred before to educate heads of boroughs and neighborhoods, community volunteers, students and the public, in sum, there were 1,209 participants in these campaigns based on the statistic. Promoting dengue vector self-checks in the communities and utilizing the society common view to eliminate dengue vectors were expected to influence 10 thousand people. There were various methods of evaluation of environmental education effectiveness. In order to enhance the impression, the prize-giveaway quiz method was given to the public and primary school students; in order to propagate the environmental education of dengue fever and improve execution via commitment, the countersignature was initiated among junior high school students; in order to evaluate the effectiveness, the questionnaires were distributed to university students before and after the environmental education of dengue fever. There were 102 completed questionnaires, and the result of the survey showed a definite improvement in the knowledge, attitude and behavior of dengue fever control was obvious based on the statistics after environmental education (p <0.05). In an effort to understand the public’s knowledge, attitude and behavior of dengue fever control, questionnaires were distributed to the public before the environmental education. The completed questionnaires were 613, and the result of the survey showed that the public could answer most of the questions correctly. This indicated that the public, who participated in the project this year, might have participated in many environmental educations in advance. Therefore, the continuous effort of promoting and conducting breeding sources cleanliness among the public would be essential to prevent dengue fever in the future.
英文關鍵字 dengue fever, density of dengue vector mosquitoes, ovitrap index, environmental education, breeding sources cleanliness