固定污染源空氣污染防制費經濟誘因制度檢討暨查核管理計畫
| 中文摘要 | 環保署自民國87年開徵固定污染源空氣污染防制費，除以齊頭式行政法規管制外，期以「經濟誘因」管制措施，促使業者主動進行污染減量。本計畫研擬相關策略包括經濟誘因評析、徵收成效分析、排放係數修訂及計量方式檢討等，以確實掌握污染源排放量並規劃符合污染者付費之制度。 經濟誘因評析方面，提出4種費率調整作業策略，包含防制設施成本分析、季節性差別費率、修正SOx及NOx適用三級防制區費率之分級基準與物價指標分析；彙整先進國家經濟誘因管制策略分析；針對收費費率與防制成本經濟效益進行分析；針對環保基金管理方式提出建議；為鼓勵業者增設防制設備及確實掌握排放量，檢討減免辦法與自廠係數作業要點。 徵收成效分析方面，完成分析歷年空污費徵收情形，並研擬空污費績效指標；完成40場次公私場所現場訪查作業，且針對相關計算方式修正建議。 排放係數修訂方面，建置高屏總量管制對象製程排放VOCs比對清單，掌握污染源排放情形，另利用空污費申報資料將管道檢測、自廠係數與現行公告係數比對分析，提出係數修正與新增建議；針對膠帶業與光電元件材料製造業完成10場次現場訪查，並提出係數修訂建議。 計量方式檢討方面，共完成15場次廢水場成分比對作業，並利用Water9計算VOCs排放係數與現行公告係數比較；提出外部燃燒鍋爐及水泥製造業等2項排放係數修正建議。 後續將持續研擬推動經濟誘因制度、建置本土化係數、執行排放量稽核作業與檢核縣市審查作業，俾使徵收作業更趨完備。 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 中文關鍵字 | 空氣污染防制費、經濟誘因、查核管理 | ||
基本資訊
| 專案計畫編號 | EPA-105-FA12-03-A116 | 經費年度 | 105 | 計畫經費 | 9330 千元 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 專案開始日期 | 2016/03/11 | 專案結束日期 | 2016/12/31 | 專案主持人 | 陳辰菖 |
| 主辦單位 | 空保處 | 承辦人 | 郭愛華 | 執行單位 | 環興科技股份有限公司 |
成果下載
| 類型 | 檔名 | 檔案大小 | 說明 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 期末報告 | EPA105FA1203A116(上傳檔).pdf | 7MB |
The project of auditing management and economical incentive policy review for air pollution control fee from stationary source
| 英文摘要 | The Environmental Protection Administration has been collecting the Air Pollution Control Fee from stationary sources since 1998, providing economic incentives for factories to proactively reduce pollutant emission. The objectives of this project are reviewing the economic incentives, analyzing the effectiveness of the collection scheme, modification of calculation coefficients, and reviewing the fee calculation methods to ultimately develop the a fair polluter-pays system were all emission sources are accounted for. To provide better economic incentives, 4 collection schemes were proposed including control device cost analysis, seasonal differential rates, differential rates based on air quality zones, and price index analysis. The economical benefit of the fee collection system was analyzed and compared to other control strategies of other countries. The collection rates and were compared with cost of reduction strategies. Advices was made on the management and usage of the Control Fund. To encourage factories to install air pollutant control devices and conduct emission inventory, fee calculation methods were evaluated. To assess the results of the fee collection scheme, Key Performance Indexes (KPI) were proposed. 40 site inspections was completed to collect opinions on the fee calculation methods. The emission coefficients are adjusted based on the VOCs emission inventory of Kaohsiung and Tainan cities and emission monitoring data. 10 on-site visits were made to tape and optoelectronic materials manufactures and amendments to their emission coefficient were proposed. In terms of the measurement method, 15 comparisons of wastewater treatment plants composition were completed, and the VOCs emission coefficient calculated by Water9 was compared with the current announcement coefficient. Suggestions were made to amend the emission coefficient of two external combustion boilers and cement manufacturing. The EAP will continue to promote the development of economic incentive of the Air Pollutant Control Fee, the development of localized coefficients, the implementation of emissions auditing operations, and review the county and city inspection operations, so that the Air Pollution Control Fee Collection Regulations would be more complete and comprehensive. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 英文關鍵字 | Air Pollution Control Fee、Economical Incentive、Auditing Management | ||