環境資源報告成果查詢系統

粒狀物逸散源調查及管制策略研擬

中文摘要 針對逸散性粒狀物管制方式,我國主要採以行政管制及經濟誘因,在行政管制方面,營建業主屬於營建工程之所有者與受益者,因此在工程施工過程,應善盡監督、管理及設置污染防制設施的責任,必須編列足夠污染防制設施經費,完整設置污染防制設施後,始能施工,故環保署分別於92年及98年發布「營建工程空氣污染防制設施管理辦法」及「固定污染源逸散性粒狀污染物空氣污染防制設施管理辦法」。基於污染者付費原則,於86年公告實施「營建工程空氣污染防制費收費費率」,向營建業主加徵空氣污染防制費,用於提升地方空氣污染改善,在經濟誘因方面,為鼓勵營建業主採行較佳空氣污染防制設施,採用防制效率較高之營建工程業主,得適用較低之費率。計畫主要工作為完備逸散性粒狀污染物管制相關法令與制度、推動逸散性粒狀物管制相關工作及督導地方落實執行逸散性粒狀污染物管制工作等工作主軸。 本計畫收集先進國家如美國、加拿大及德國等,對於吹葉機污染源管制措施及方法,國內則已有部分縣市及學校自治禁止或限制使用吹葉機,如臺北市環保局於議會公報中,決議禁止於市區內人行道使用吹葉機;臺中市建設局則公告公園、綠地、園道及行道樹綠美化維護工作禁止使用吹葉機,本計畫建議依據空氣污染防制法第三十一條第二項,公告禁止鋪面及未鋪面道路、人行道、道路邊溝使用吹葉機清掃之行為,致引起揚塵。 本計畫檢討營建工程空氣污染防制設施管理辦法,本署參考美國及韓國法規,加嚴懸浮微粒三級防制區及第二級營建工程之空氣污染防制設施規範,並將逸散性粒狀污染物質擾動作業或操作納入規範,營建業主於工程進行期間,應採行效率較佳之空氣污染防制設施,提升車行路徑及裸露地覆蓋面積,減少粒狀污染物排放量。營建工程空氣污染防制費收費費率方面,考量因素包含國內物價指數、各工程污染影響及國民健康成本因子,104年度國內物價指數相較87年增加1.17倍,各工程污染削減率也相對提升,唯國民健康成本因子係數仍使用88年研究報告結果,故在費率檢討上,推估空污費與防制設施費用差距甚大,致無經濟誘因,應重新檢討提升空氣污染防制費費率。空氣污染防制費收費辦法方面,有鑑於營建工程防止營建業主短報空污費及營建工程完工未解除列管而造成呆帳現象,本計畫建議修正空氣污染費收費辦法第七條。 本計畫執行三種料堆(廢鐵礦砂、營建土方、廢爐渣)之模場實驗,藉由檢測結果探討影響逸散性粒狀物排放之因子,期作為訂定或修正各行業別排放係數之參據,由實驗結果得知不同類型料堆之PM2.5排放率介於 24~1,176 mg/hr之間,換計以料堆重量計之排放係數(Emission Factor)約為0.39~18.82 g/ton/day,由實驗中可發現,其中物料含水量、細坋土含量及風速對實驗影響較顯著。本計畫利用風罩模場實驗的同時,也蒐集測站逐時量測PM2.5/PM10比值,不同類型料之PM2.5/PM10比值平均約在0.067~0.11之間,顯示地面料堆之原始PM2.5排放源占PM10比例約只有6~11%,同時段參考鄰近監測站之測值比值為0.55,實驗結果之PM2.5/PM10比值平均值低於測站結果,本研究獲得之料堆PM2.5逸散排放比率較國內排放清冊為低,雖然無法代表全部料堆之排放量,但可以依照比重、性質、結構等等物理性質做為相近料堆的排放量參考依據,供後續逸散性粒狀物排放量推估參考。 彙整全國空氣污染法執法情形,在各縣市工業與營建工程稽查處分情形,在工業方面,105年1月至10月新北市工業稽查件數17,498件最多,其次為臺北市11,823件,以南投縣稽查次數較少,僅有103件。另在處分上,則以臺中市310件最多,其次為桃園市及高雄市281件,嘉義縣僅2件最少。在營建工程方面,105年1月至10月以臺北市稽查數量1,190件最多,新北市584件次之,以臺中市26件最少。告發處分情形則是以桃園市62件最多,其次為新北市51件,南投縣則未有告發,民眾陳情105年1月至11月空氣污染總陳情件數約85,763件,其中營建工程陳情數量僅3,202件。在管理辦法查核比率方面,全國第一級營建工程平均查核率為76.4%,第一級營建工程平均查核符合率為88.5%,第二級營建工程平均查核率為65.2%,第二級營建工程平均查核符合率為86.7%。105年營建工程懸浮微粒(PM10)原始排放量約56,949.8噸/年,經環保機關管制後,懸浮微粒(PM10)現況排放量約23,167.5噸/年,平均削減率約59.3%。 協助推動粒狀物逸散源管制工作方面,完成7處港區、7處工業區道路追蹤調查及17縣市道路巡查。經調查結果顯示,在港區方面,臺北港與臺中港缺失比例較高,蘇澳港今年度缺失項目有明顯改善,港區內常見缺失為車行路徑、輸送作業及操作裝卸作業等污染情形。工業區道路追蹤方面,調查104年度7處工業區缺失項目均於本(105)年度完成改善,但本次調查仍發現有工業區內公私場所及營建工地出入口道路有明顯髒污色差,造成道路污染。本計畫執行19縣市道路髒污調查,巡查長度1,138.6公里,共通報111件污染通報,以宜蘭縣道路污染通報件數最多達12件,其次為臺中市、臺南市及高雄市各11件,道路污染來源主要以營建工程出入口路面污染最多,占約41%,各縣市接獲髒污通報後皆於期限內完成改善。
中文關鍵字 逸散性粒狀污染物、營建工程、削減率

基本資訊

專案計畫編號 EPA-105-FA12-03-A135 經費年度 105 計畫經費 8500 千元
專案開始日期 2016/03/31 專案結束日期 2017/12/31 專案主持人 賴柏錡
主辦單位 空保處 承辦人 許平和 執行單位 新紀工程顧問有限公司

成果下載

類型 檔名 檔案大小 說明
期末報告 期末報告定稿(公開版).pdf 54MB

Survey and Regulatory Policy Plan for Fugitive Particulate Emissions

英文摘要 For the fugitive particulate matter control, we mainly adopt administrative control and economic incentives. In the part of administrative control, the construction business owner is the owner and beneficiary of the construction project. Therefore, it should perform the supervision, management and installation of pollution control facilities in the construction process, and should allocate sufficient funds for pollution prevention and control facilities and complete the installation of pollution control facilities before starting the work. Therefore, the Environmental Protection Administration (EPA) issued the “Measures for the Management of Air Pollution Control Facilities in Construction Projects” and the “Measures for the Management of Air Pollution Control Facilities for Fugitive Particulate Pollutants in Fixed Sources” in 2003 and 2007 respectively. Based on the principle that the polluter pays, the “Air Pollution Control Fee Rate for Construction Works” was promulgated in 1997 to introduce air pollution control fees to construction owners in an aim to improve the local air pollution situation. In the part of economic incentives, in order to encourage construction owners to adopt better air pollution control facilities, lower rates may apply on those who use air pollution control facilities of higher control efficiency. The main work of the project is to complete related regulations and systems for the control of fugitive particulate pollutants, promote the work related to the control of fugitive particulate matter, and supervise the implementation of fugitive particulate pollutant control work. In this plan, control measures and methods adopted by advanced countries such as the United States, Canada and Germany for leaf blower pollution were first collected. The some cities, counties and schools in Taiwan have being spontaneity prohibited or restricted the use of leaf blowers. For example, the Taipei Municipal Environmental Protection Bureau passed a resolution in its city council gazette to ban the use of leaf blowers on the city’s sidewalks, and Taichung City Construction Bureau announced that leaf blowers are banned in parks, green spaces and park roads for sidewalk tree greening and maintenance. It is also announced in the project according to Paragraph 2, Article 31 of the Air Pollution Control Act that the use of leaf blowers for cleaning of paved and unpaved roads, pavements and roadside ditches are banned in order to prevent the dust rising. The Measures for the Management of Air Pollution Control Facilities in Construction Projects is reviewed in this plan. With reference to the laws and regulations of the United States and South Korea, the Department tightened the regulations on air pollution control facilities of Suspended Particulate Control Zone 3 and second level construction projects, and included in the regulation the agitation work or operation of fugitive particulate pollutants. In the construction process the construction business owner shall adopt air pollution control facilities with better efficiency to increase the area of the motor vehicle path and the exposed area, so as to reduce the discharge of particulate pollutants. In terms of construction project air pollution control fees, factors such as the domestic price index, the pollution impact of each project and the national health cost were taken into account. The domestic price index in 2015 increased by 1.17 times from that in 1998, and the pollution reduction rate of each project also increased. However, the national health cost factor is still from the results of the 1999 study. Therefore, in the review of construction fees it is not possible to clearly reflect the actual fees. Regarding the approach to construction project air pollution control fees, in the project it is proposed to amend Article 7 of the Air Pollution Fee Charging Scheme in order to prevent construction owners from reporting lower air pollution fees and avoid uncollectable accounts from finished construction works which are not deregulated. In this plan a model field experiment on three types of piles (scrap iron ore, construction earthworks and waste slag) was carried out to explore the factors affecting the emission of fugitive particulate matter by using the test results as a basis for setting or revising emissions by industry sector. According to the experiment results, the PM2.5 emission rates of the different types of piles are between 24 and 1,176 mg/hr, and the emission factor of the pile weight is about 0.39 to 18.82 G/ton/day. It can be found from the experiment that the material’s water and fine soil content and the wind speed have a more significant impact on the experiment. In this project the PM2.5/PM10 ratio was also measured in the windshield model field experiment, and the PM2.5/PM10 ratio is averaged between 0.067 and 0.11, indicating that the original PM2.5 emission source of the ground material pile accounted for only about 6 to 11% of the PM10. In the same period the ratio of the neighboring reference station was 0.55. The mean PM2.5/PM10 ratio of the experimental results was lower than that of the reference station. The PM2.5 emission rate obtained in this research is lower than that of the domestic emission rate. Although it can’t represent the emission of all the material piles, it can be used as a reference for the emission of the similar materials according to the physical properties such as specific gravity, nature and structure, and serve as a reference for follow-up fugitive particulate matter emission estimation. After compiling the air pollution control act enforcement information and the industrial and construction project inspection and punishment information in various cities and counties, it is found that in the industrial sector, New Taipei City had the largest number of industrial inspections of 17,498 from January to October 2016, followed by 11,823 of Taipei City, and Nantou had the smallest number of only 103. In terms of punishment, Taichung City had the largest number of 296, followed by 310 of Kaohsiung City, and Chiayi County had the smallest number of only 2. In terms of construction projects, Taipei City had the largest number of inspections of 1,190 from January to October 2016, followed by 584 of New Taipei City, and Taichung City had the smallest number of 26. In terms of the number of reporting that led to punishment, Taoyuan City had the largest number of 62, followed by 51 of New Taipei City, and Nantou County had none. In terms of civil complaints, the total number of air pollution complaints in the period from January to November 2016 was 85,763, and only 3,202 were on construction projects. In terms of the rate of inspection on management measures, the average inspection rate of first-class construction projects was 76.4%, and 88.5% of the first-class construction projects met the requirement. The average inspection rate of second-class construction projects was 65.2%, and 86.7% of the second-class construction projects met the requirement. The original emission of PM10 was about 56,949.8 tons in 2016. After the control measures imposed by environmental protection authorities, the emissions of particulate matter (PM10) was about 23,167.5 tons per year, with an average reduction rate of 59.3%. In terms of the assistance in promoting the control of particulate emission sources, the road tracking survey was completed in seven port areas and seven industrial areas, and the road inspection was completed in 19 cities and counties. The survey results show that, in the port areas, the Taipei port and the Taichung port had a high proportion of problems, and the Suao port has improved significantly this year. The common problems in the port areas are the pollution of port vehicle paths, transport operations and handling operations. In terms of the tracking of industrial area roads, all the problem items in the seven industrial areas in 2015 were improved in this year (2016). However, in this inspection it is still found that in industrial areas there are obvious pollution and color differences in public and private places and the entrances and exits of construction sites that resulted in road pollution. In this plan, road pollution inspections were carried out in 19 counties and cities with a total length of 1,138.6 km, and a total of 111 pollutions were reported. Yilan County had the largest number of reported road pollutions of 12, followed by 11 of Taichung City, Tainan City and Kaohsiung City respectively. The main road pollution is from the construction entrance and exit pollution, accounting for about 41%. All the cities and counties which were reported to have pollutions have completed the correction within the deadline.
英文關鍵字 Fugitive Particulate, Construction, Reduction rate