環境資源報告成果查詢系統

106年度廢乾電池及廢照明光源回收處理體系調查分析暨執行成效評估專案工作計畫

中文摘要 本計畫執行期程為106年2月10日至12月31日,乾電池方面已蒐集調查穿戴式產品應用之高能量電池(二次鋰電池)及電動車用電池之相關資訊;照明光源方面已調查彙整LED照明及新興產品OLED照明之應用範圍資訊及市場趨勢,作為國內回收處理管道檢討及責任物納管研商之參酌。市售乾電池及照明光源已分別完成130組與50組之採樣及送驗作業,鈕扣電池整體大部分皆符合限制乾電池製造、輸入及販賣規範,另3種類型鈕扣電池之環保標章合格率偏低,緊密型及安定器內藏式照明光源103~105年之檢測平均較現行「單位重量汞含量」標準差異較大。另已完成照明光源及乾電池單位回收清除處理成本更新並估算提出費率修正草案,並提出乾電池浮動分級費率。非列管LED照明如檯燈、路燈及車燈,評估尚不宜納入公告範圍,原因包括廢棄量有限、非綠色設計、特定回收管道、新興產品替代問題。另歐盟循環經濟發展措施,包括專注商品耐久性及可回收性、改變消費模式,促進維修再使用及回收、廢棄物管理升級、廢棄物資源化等面向。有關電弧爐處理廢乾電池,目前嘉德創公司甲級事業廢棄物處理業許可證展延已通過,預計12月後新增電池代碼項目申請,另台灣鋼聯公司預計11月後申請環差報告新增廢乾電池處理項目。資再比調整之評估結果,廢直管照明可增加約1~2%,非直管可增加約5%,廢乾電池則建議提高比率至85~90%。已完成2場次廢照明光源處理廠汞流布現勘輔導作業,並提出具體可行之建議後輔導業者改善完成。宣導海報方面,今年度除持續加強106年起納管回收LED照明之回收宣傳外,應同時宣導各類傳統照明光源回收,並以現行照明之回收體系及管道執行回收工作;乾電池應加強行動電源及電動車用電池回收宣導,另同時著重原廢乾電池回收管道及電動車用電池回收管道之宣傳。根據電池製造/進口業者訪查結果,目前鋰鐵電池確有其市場發展限制性,高能量電池與鋰三元電池則市場發展潛力大。另已經由網路及實體商店完成1~4季共160家未登責任業者調查並提交相關資訊,作為環保署後續查核及追蹤依據。評估101~105年廢乾電池及廢照明光源類之回收處理技術研發補助計畫,其中「回收廢鋰電池再生資源之研究」及「廢鋰電池回收處理技術研究」,在技術及經濟效益較具擴大推廣之潛勢。
中文關鍵字 回收處理、費率與補貼費率、重金屬檢驗、創新補助

基本資訊

專案計畫編號 EPA-106-HA15-13-A064 經費年度 106 計畫經費 5650 千元
專案開始日期 2017/02/10 專案結束日期 2017/12/31 專案主持人 黃逸祥
主辦單位 回收基管會 承辦人 徐伊亭 執行單位 財團法人台灣產業服務基金會

成果下載

類型 檔名 檔案大小 說明
期末報告 EPA-106-HA15-13-A064公開.pdf 16MB 期末報告公開版

Inspecting and Analyzing the Collection and Recycling systems of Waste Batteries and Waste Lamps, and Evaluating their Effectiveness

英文摘要 The project period was from Feb 10, 2017 to Dec 31, 2017. The information of high energy batteries (secondary Li), car batteries (for electric or hybrid vehicles use), LED lamps and OLED lamps had been investigated and analyzed for the evaluation of collection and recycling or regulating as recyclable wastes. The sampling and testing works of 130 batteries and 50 lamps were finished. The testing results of most button cell batteries were complied with the regulation of dry batteries manufacturing, importing and selling limitation. And 3 types of button cell batteries’ qualified percentages for the eco-label were low. The unit weight of mercury content calculated by average testing results from 2014 to 2016 for the compact fluorescence lamp was lower than the regulation standards. The unit costs for collection and recycling of both batteries and lamps were reviewed and the drafts of levy and subsidy rate were proposed. Also the differential levy and subsidy rate of batteries based on the collection rate’s range were drafted. By evaluating the conditions of desk LED lamps, street LED lights and cars’ LED headlights, it was concluded that those LED lamps were not suitable for regulating as recyclable wastes currently. The reasons were limited waste volumes, without product green design, specific collection paths and the substitute of new products. The European commission developed the circular economy strategies, which included the focusing on the durability and recyclability of products, changing consumers’ behavior, promoting reuse and collection, upgrading the wastes management and wastes to resources. By recycling waste batteries with the arc furnace, the waste treatment plant Katec Creative Resources Corp. already passed the extension for its treating permit and will apply the addition of waste batteries as one of its treating items in December. Another waste treatment plant Taiwan Steel Union Co., Ltd. will apply the environment impact assessment report covered adding the treating item waste batteries after November. About the adjustment suggestions for recycling rate standards, the recycling rate standard of linear fluorescence lamps should be raised 1~2%, the non-linear fluorescence lamps should be raised 5%, and the batteries should be raised to 85~90%. Two reviewing field surveys for the mercury distribution within the waste lamp recycling plants had been held and provided the recycling plant with suggestions. And the further improvements had been finished. For the poster, the collection of waste LED lamps (were regulated as the recyclable wastes since 2017) and waste traditional lamps should be considered as the main designing point. The waste LED lamps will be recycled through the current collection and recycling system. For the collection of waste mobile power units and electric car batteries, the poster should emphasize the different collection points for them and do not throw them as the municipal solid wastes. According to the visiting results of the battery importer/manufacturer, the product scope of LiFePO4 battery was limited in the market. The high energy batteries (Li-Co) and 3 elements batteries (Li-Ni-Co-Mn) did have the better market potential. 160 unregistered entities had been inspected through the web and retailers in 4 quarters. EPA will continue to trace the recycling fees they should submit. By evaluating the 2012 to 2016 achievements for subsidizing the inventing and researching of regulated recyclable wastes collection and recycling, the two researches of ”collected waste lithium battery recycling resource” and “waste lithium battery collection and recycling technology” should have the technical and economic efficiency potentials for future market expanding.
英文關鍵字 collection and recycling, the fee rate and subsidy rate, heavy metal concentrations testing, subsidy for technical developments