環境資源報告成果查詢系統

106年度雲林縣有害污染物監測及調查計畫

中文摘要 本計畫於106年11月20日開始執行,工作內容包含統整及分析有害空氣污染物監測數據;彙整分析本縣轄區固定污染源有害空氣污染物排放資料,檢視本縣應優先納管物種及固定源管制對象;辦理揮發性有機物連續監測;執行有害空氣污染物檢測。本報告期間各項工作執行成果,主要如下: (1)為掌握特殊性工業區測站HAP物種之環境濃度水準,本計畫已完成104年至106年六輕工業區監測資料之彙整解析,並篩選出六輕工業區重要污染物種,主要包含苯、乙苯、砷、甲醛、鎳、鉛及乙醛等物種,其中以甲醛之年平均濃度最高(20.5~54.1 ppbv),顯示甲醛普遍存在於環境大氣中;重金屬物種以鉛之年平均濃度較高(0.010~0.016 μg/m3),皆低於國外環境濃度基準值/比較值(0.5 μg/m3)。考量各物種危害特性,致癌風險以甲醛、乙醛以及苯之危害較大;非致癌危害以乙醛之危害較大。 (2)本計畫另已完成4季之有害空氣污染物環境濃度監測作業,針對VOCs、醛酮類化合物、酸性氣體及PAHs等4類物種進行採樣分析,共計採得16件樣品。VOCs共測得5種物種,以甲醇測得濃度(23.9 ppbv)最高,其次依序為2-丁酮(平均值5.1 ppbv)、丙酮(平均值4.5 ppbv)及甲苯(平均值2.9 ppbv);醛酮類化合物共測得3種,以甲醛測得濃度(平均值0.0275 ppmv)最高,其次為乙醛(平均值0.0217 ppmv),出現頻率皆不高;酸性氣體共檢測7項,檢測結果皆為N.D.,或是檢測值雖高於MDL濃度、但低於檢量線最低濃度,顯示在此區域大氣環境中酸性氣體濃度皆很低;PAHs共測得4種,以Naphthalene (平均值65.4 ng/m3)測得濃度為最高,其次為Phenanthrene(平均值4.7 ng/m3),顯示在此區域大氣環境中PAH之出現頻率並不高。 (3)解析雲林縣100~106年空污費收費有害空氣污染物種排放資料,13項有害VOCs中以甲苯及二甲苯排放量占比最高,且皆以製程排放量之貢獻最大(738.4~1,070.9公噸,81.5~90.8 %)。進一步篩選優先納管物種及管制對象,考量各物種對人體之危害性以計算致癌性毒性權重排放量,解析結果顯示應以苯、1,2-二氯乙烷及三氯甲烷為優先納管物種。解析非致癌性毒性權重排放量,則以甲苯之貢獻占比最高,顯示應以甲苯為優先納管之物種。 (4)有關主要有害空氣污染物排放製程單元之排放調查作業,本計畫針對「PU皮製造程序」、「凹版印刷作業程序」、「膠帶業製造」、「丙烯睛-丁二烯-苯乙烯共聚合物(ABS)化學製造程序」、「苯乙烯製造程序」及「鄰苯二甲酸酐製造程序」為對象,進行15根次排放管道檢測作業,以進行排放係數之計算與建置。所得排放係數與國內外相同製程之有害空氣污染物排放係數進行比對,顯示本計畫所建置之排放係數皆較國內外相同製程排放係數為低(差異約78.5~100 %)。 (5)VOCS長期連續監測結果顯示相對高值主要來自於工業區方向,北方位點為來自東南到西南方向,南方位點主要來自西北與東北風向。 (6)北方位點除丙烯以外的測項,長期監測結果顯示逐月平均濃度在5.0 ppb以下,在夏季為平均值最高時期。而丙烯6月有28.9 ppb的月平均值,7月則是14.5 ppb,其他月份則相對較低,此現象時間恰符合此兩月份多廠歲修作業期間。 (7)南方位點所有測項整體監測結果,也顯示逐月平均濃度在5.0 ppb以下,除了丙烯與丁二烯在6-8月有相對較高月平均值,其餘測項月平均值趨勢大致以秋冬季相對於夏季為高,此一現象符合本位點盛行風向的改變。 (8)探討整體監測期間內出現的最高值,北方位點測得相對其他測項的最高值為丙烯,曾在7月測得381.3 ppb,異戊烷也在該月份測得整個期間內最高值56.9 ppb; 而南方位點測得相對其他測項的最高值為丙烯,曾在6月測得142.5 ppb,此外,南方位點9月夜間曾測得苯最高值104.4 ppb,而參照環保署公告「固定污染源有害空氣污染物排放標準」草案規範值,已超過規範值20.0 ppb。 (9)揮發性有機化合物(VOCs)監測物種為87項,其測得物種共計28項,測得比例50 %以上共計7項,50 %以下共計21項。此外,12個監測站皆測得之物種共5項,以甲醇測得濃度(平均值19.03 ppb)最高,其次依序為丙酮(平均值6.19 ppb)、甲苯(平均值1.21 ppb)及2-丁酮(平均值0.76 ppb)。 (10)醛酮化合物監測物種為16項,其測得物種共計3項,測得比例50 %以上無測得,50 %以下共計3項。 (11)戴奧辛類化合物監測物種為17項,皆有測得,測得比例皆高於50 %。雖然在質量濃度方面許厝分校高於鎮西國小,但比較測量值之間的總PCDD/Fs pg WHO2005-TEQ/Nm3濃度,鎮西國小總毒性當量(0.0229 WHO2005-TEQ/Nm3)則略高於許厝國小(0.0223 WHO2005-TEQ/Nm3),但兩者並未達到顯著差異(p=0.914)。因鎮西國小及許厝分校戴奧辛質量濃度貢獻比不相同而導致不一樣的毒性當量,依據此結果說明兩地區為不同污染來源所致。此外,利用主成分分析(Principal component analysis, PCA)探討,結果顯示汽機車之排放廢氣為鎮西大氣PCDD/Fs可能污染來源之一;許厝分校因在兩族群中解釋率皆未達到0.6以上,因此仍須進一步收集其他相關數據、資料輔助以利比對確認許厝大氣中戴奧辛可能之來源。 (12)重金屬(含六價鉻及汞)監測物種為23項,皆有測得,測得比例50 %以上共計18項(含六價鉻及汞),50 %以下共計5項。此外,12個監測站皆測得之物種共14項,以六價鉻測得濃度(平均值0.0442 µg/m3)最高。 (13)多環芳香烴(PAHs)監測物種為17項,皆有測得,測得比例50 %以上共計4項,50 %以下共計13項。此外,12個監測站皆測得之物種共2項,以Naphthalene萘(平均值60.7 ng/m3)測得濃度為最高。鎮西國小測得PAHs之12件次總濃度範圍為87.1-205 ng/m3,總毒性當量(Bapeq)濃度範圍為為0.09-0.20 ng Bapeq/m3;許厝分校總PAHs濃度範圍為21.5-145 ng/m3,總Bapeq濃度範圍為為0.02-0.15 ng Bapeq/m3。此外,鎮西與許厝兩地區FLU/(FLU+PYR)特徵比值分別為0.81與0.94,推測PAHs來源可歸類為工業用柴油燃燒所致。 (14)酸鹼氣體監測物種為10項,其測得物種共計6項,測得比例50 %以上共計2項,50 %以下共計4項。此外,12個監測站皆測得之物種共1項,該物種為氨氣。
中文關鍵字 有害空氣污染物、揮發性有機物、多環芳香烴化合物

基本資訊

專案計畫編號 經費年度 106 計畫經費 16200 千元
專案開始日期 2017/11/20 專案結束日期 2018/11/19 專案主持人 陳俊能
主辦單位 雲林縣環境保護局 承辦人 何政憲 執行單位 捷思環能股份有限公司

成果下載

類型 檔名 檔案大小 說明
期末報告 YLEPB-106066.pdf 0MB

Yunlin County Hazardous Pollutants Monitoring and survey Plan in year 2017

英文摘要 This Project commenced on 20/11/2017. Project scopes include •consolidated and analyzed data of hazardous air pollutants; •consolidated and analyzed emission information of hazardous air pollutants from stationary sources in the county; •evaluated priorities on regulating target stationary sources; •continuous emission monitoring of VOCs; and •tested hazardous air pollutants Project results during the reporting period are summarized below. (1)To better understanding HAP species concentrations in special industrial stations, this Project had consolidated and analyzed monitoring information in Liuhing Industrial District from 2015 to 2017. Seven important pollutants, namely Benzene, Ethylbenzene, Arsenic, Formaldehyde, Nickel, Lead and Acetaldehyde were picked. Formaldehyde had the highest yearly average concentration (20.5~54.1 ppbv) among all pollutants, indicating formaldehyde was commonly found in atmosphere. Lead was among heavy metals that had the highest yearly average concentration (0.010~0.016 μg/m3), but it was below overseas baseline concentration (0.5 μg/m3). Having taken into consideration the hazardous nature of all pollutants, formaldehyde, acetaldehyde and benzene had higher risk of carcinogenicity whereas acetaldehyde imposed the greatest non-cancer-causing risks on health. (2)4-season monitoring of hazardous air pollutants targeting VOCs, carbonyl compounds, acidic gases and PAHs had been completed. 16 samples were collected, and 5 types of VOCs were tested with methanol having the highest concentration (23.9 ppbv), followed by 2-Butanone (5.1 ppbv), Acetone (4.5 ppbv) and Toluene (2.9 ppbv). 3 types of carbonyl compounds were tested with formaldehyde having the highest concentration (0.0275 ppmv), followed by acetaldehyde (0.0217 ppmv), but occurrences were not frequent. Test results of 7 types of acidic gases showed N.D. or exceeded MDL concentrations but below lowest concentration of calibration line, indicating ambient acidic gases concentration was low. 4 types of PAHs were measured with Naphthalene being the highest (65.4 ng/m3) followed by Phenanthrene (4.7 ng/m3), indicating emissions of PAHs in the atmosphere of the district were low. (3)Explained the reasons of air pollution levy on hazardous air pollutants in Yunlin County from 2011-2017. Among 13 VOCs, emissions of Toluene and Xylene topped the measurements. They also contributed most to the process emissions (738.4~1,070.9 tonne, 81.5~90.8 %). Confirmed the priority of regulating Benzene, Ethylene dichloride and chloroform after having taken into consideration of their impacts to human beings and in terms of carcinogenic emission volumes. Toluene should be listed as the top regulated substance since it contributed the greatest volume to the emissions of non-carcinogenic substances. (4)Regarding investigation into emissions of major hazardous air pollutants in manufacturing processes, 15 times of exhaust duct testing, targeting “PU Leather Manufacturing Process”, “Gravure Printing Process”, “Plastic Tape Manufacturing”, “Acrylonitrile-Butadiene- Styrene Compounds (ABS) Chemical Manufacturing Process”, “Styrene Manufacturing Process” and “Phthalic Anhydride Manufacturing Process”, had been conducted for calculating emission coefficients. Emission coefficients were compared with coefficients obtained from similar local and overseas manufacturing processes. Results showed the emission coefficients obtained from this Project were lower than local and overseas figures, with 78.5-100 % difference. (5)Based on the results of continuous monitoring of VOCs, relatively higher concentrations were obtained from industrial district. North location was being influenced by emissions from South East and South West directions while South location was being influenced by emissions from North West and North East directions. (6)Except Acrylic, monthly average concentrations of all measurements in North location were below 5.0 ppb. Summer was the season with the highest average concentration. Monthly average concentration of Acrylic in June was 28.9 ppb, and 14.5 ppb in July, while other months have relatively lower concentrations. This was consistent to the time when factories were undergoing overhaul. (7)Monthly average concentrations of all measurement results in South location were below 5.0 ppb. Except the measurements of acrylic and Butadiene in June to August having higher concentrations, other measurements have higher concentrations in winter than summer. This phenomenon was consistent with the influence of prevailing wind directions. (8)Peak values of Acryl and Pentane in North location were record in July with 381.3 ppb and 56.9 ppb respectively while maximum value of Acryl in South location was recorded in June with 142.2 ppb. A measurement of Benzene with 104.4 ppb took place in September which exceeded the limit of 20.0 ppb under Stationary Sources of Hazardous Air Pollutants Emission Standards. (9)28 detectable compounds among 87 VOCs were detected. Numbers of compounds with detectable ratios above and below 50 % are 7 and 21 respectively. 5 VOCs were detected at 12 monitoring stations. Methanol had the highest concentration (average 19.03 ppb) followed by Acetone (average 6.19 ppb), Toluene (average 1.21 ppb) and Methyl Ethyl Ketone (average 0.76 ppb) . (10)3 carbonyl compounds were detected among 16 carbonyl compounds being monitored. There were three compounds with detectable ratio below 50 %. (11)Ratio of 17 detectable dioxin-like compounds was all over 50 %. Despite XuCuo branch school had a higher mass concentration than JengChi Elementary School, JengChi Elementary School had higher Toxicity Equivalent Quotient (0.0229 WHO2005-TEQ/Nm3) than XuCuo branch school (0.0223 WHO2005-TEQ/Nm3) in terms of total PCDD/Fs pg WHO2005-TEQ/Nm3concentration. However, the difference was not obvious (p=0.914). Contributions of Dioxin concentration by XuCuo branch school and JengChi Elementary School were different, leading to difference in TEQ. This showed pollutions in these two places came from different sources. Besides, vehicle emissions could be one of the pollution sources for ambient PCDD/Fs in JengChi based on the results of Principle Component Analysis, PCA. Explanatory rate of XuCuo branch school had yet to reach 0.6 or above in order to confirm the possible sources of ambient dioxin. More data and information were needed. (12)23 types of heavy metals, including Hexavalent Chromium and Mercury, were detected. 18 types of heavy metals with detectable ratio exceeded 50 % and the rest of the heavy metals were below 50 %. On the other hands, 14 types of heavy metals were detected at 12 monitoring stations with the concentration of Hexavalent Chromium being the highest (average 0.0442 µg/m3). (13)17 types of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) were detected. 4 types of PAHs with detectable ratio over 50 % whereas 13 types of PAHs were below 50 %. There were only 2 types of PAHs detected at 12 monitoring stations with the concentration of Naphthalene being the highest (60.7 ng/m3). Total measurement range in 12 PAHs samples at JengChi Elementary School was 87.1-205 ng/m3, and 0.09-0.20 in terms of total toxic equivalent quotient (Bapeq). Sources of PAHs in JengChi and XuCuo districts were likely to be the burning of industrial diesel based on the FLU/(FLU+PYR) in these two districts, which were 0.81 and 0.94 respectively. (14)6 out of 10 types of acid and alkali gases were detected. 2 gases with detectable ratio of over 50 % whereas 4 gases were below 50 %. Besides, only Ammonia was detected at 12 monitoring stations.
英文關鍵字 HAPs, VOCs, PAHs