106至107年度土壤及地下水污染整治法規增修暨諮詢服務計畫
| 中文摘要 | 土壤及地下水污染整治法(下稱土污法)於民國８９年２月２日公布施行,雖於９９年２月３日作大幅度之修正,但實務上仍產生諸多爭議與困境,且近年來公眾環保意識抬頭,總統府就環境法已完成多項司法改革國是會議共識,９９年土污法施行迄今亦經將近九年,本計畫所設定之主要目標即是通盤檢討並修正土污法,並提供非訟之綜合性法律專業諮詢服務,協助各級主管機關處理土污法所設法律疑義。本團隊在本計畫已完成之主要工作成果如下: 1.對各級環保主管機關所提出之法律問題,完成法律交辦案件七件,並提供法律意見書八則。 2.列席污染場址相關會議二場,針對個案污染場址提出諮詢建議,並與環工公司及前美國環保署超級基金場址整治計畫專案管理人陳憲章博士進行十二場有關污染場址及修法之討論會議。 3.就污染場址完成五份求償規劃報告,俾利相關求償業務之推動。 4.蒐集研析美國ＣＥＲＣＬＡ關於以風險管理作為污染場址解除列管之制度,及英、美二國關於污染責任人之認定、代為履行污染整治之財產保全制度,並與我國現行土污法比較後,提出適用於我國之具體修正建議。 5.就土污法修法之各項議題,舉辦四場環保署內部討論會議、四場各直轄市、縣(市)政府環保機關討論會議。 6.結合理論與實務提出土污法修正制度草案,並提出英譯版本,其中包含司法改革國是會議達成共識部分。 7.為各環保機關之同仁辦理二場土污法修正制度草案研討會及一場土污法、行政法及相關法規研討會,俾利同仁能更熟悉土污法及未來修正方向,以解決實務上遭遇之困難。 8.針對現行土污法及其相關法規彙編,進行數位化編製並完成行動裝置專用版本。 9.辦理六場善良管理人注意義務認定準則暨土污法規說明會,使民眾得以了解並遵循相關法令規定。 10.提出土污基金ＳＧＭ求償系統登錄填寫稽核表,俾利主管機關檢視土污基金代為支應案件執行情形。最後,本團隊就上開研究成果及協助過程所得,提出短期、中期與長期目標之建議。 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 中文關鍵字 | 土壤及地下水污染整治法、求償、風險管理、污染責任人、整治利得優先權 | ||
基本資訊
| 專案計畫編號 | EPA-106-GA11-13-A141 | 經費年度 | 106 | 計畫經費 | 8300 千元 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 專案開始日期 | 2017/04/07 | 專案結束日期 | 2018/12/31 | 專案主持人 | 張訓嘉 |
| 主辦單位 | 土污基管會 | 承辦人 | 許位嘉 | 執行單位 | 立言法律事務所 |
成果下載
| 類型 | 檔名 | 檔案大小 | 說明 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 期末報告 | 106-107 主計畫 期末報告本文(含附錄1-7) 20190128.pdf | 8MB |
2017 AD to 2018 AD Project on the Research ＆ Revision of Law, the Consultation of Legal Ambiguities of the Fund concerning the Soil and Groundwater Pollution Remediation Act
| 英文摘要 | The Soil and Groundwater Remediation Act was promulgated and enacted on February 2, 2000. Despite a big scale revision on February 3, 2010, the Act still has encountered various disputes and awkwardness in its practice. Furthermore, due to the increasing environmental consciousness in public, the President Office has effectuated reaching consensus on several environmental law topics through National Conference on Judicial Reform Matters. The Act of 2010 version has enacted for nearly 9 years, therefore the main purposes set in this Project are to conduct an overall discussion and revision on the Act, provide general legal consultation services on non-litigation matters and also assist competent authorities of all levels in dealing with legal ambiguities arising from the Act. In this Project the team has accomplished main working results as follows: 1.Completing 7 response sheets on legal matters and providing 8 legal opinions concerning the various legal questions presented by competent authorities of all levels. 2.Attending 2 meetings on polluted sites and providing consultation advices on some individual polluted sites, and further attending 12 discussion meetings with environmental engineering companies and Dr. Shian-Jang Chen, former U.S. EPA Superfund Remedial Project Manager for various topics concerning the polluted sites or the revision of this Act. 3.Drafting 5 reports on fee recovery plan relating to polluted sites, so as to facilitate the proceeding of claim affairs. 4.Collecting and analyzing information relating to the risk management mechanism in delisting polluted sites under CERCLA of the United States, also the identification of persons responsible for pollution and the claim preservation system on substitute performance of remediation action in United Kingdom and United States. 5.Organizing and holding 4 interior meetings inside the Environmental Protection Administration, 4 discussion meetings among special municipality, county and city environmental competent authorities. 6.Drafting an overall revised version on the Soil and Groundwater Remediation Act in combination of the theory and practice, and translating the revised Act from Chinese into English, among the revised Articles are those having consensus in National Conference on Judicial Reform Matters. 7.Holding 2 meetings to discuss the draft of revised Soil and Groundwater Remediation Act and a conference on the Act, administrative law and pertinent laws and regulations for the colleagues in environmental competent authorities of all levels, so as to enable them to get more familiar with the Act and aware of the future direction of its revision and thereby can resolve the problems that might be encountered in the practice. 8.Conducting digital compilation and editing of current laws and regulations relevant to this Act and completing the formulation of a specialized APP edition thereof. 9.Conducting 6 interpretation meetings on the Guidelines for determining the due diligence of a good land manager and this Act, so as to enable the public to realize and comply with such laws and regulations. 10.Submitting the audit list for the registration and inscription in SGM Fee Recovery System, facilitating the competent authorities to inspect the enforcement situation of those cases acquiring the support of expenditures from the Soil and Groundwater Remediation Fund. Finally, the team has presented suggestions on future goals from short, middle and long term perspectives. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 英文關鍵字 | cost recvoery, Risk Management, Persons Responsible for Pollution, Windfall Lien | ||